Do you want me to make more puzzles? (Optional and has nothing to do with solving this)
Random fact: Whenever I'm stuck in something, I try to understand its source.
Random fact1: Arabs used to cipher their letters by making each character of their sentences bold.
Random fact2: I'm half Arab.
Random fact3: These facts aren't facts.
Random fact4: Someone who uses 0-indexing is probably a liar.
Random fact5: 'Palindrome' is not a palindrome. (Thanks @gorok).
Random fact6: If you multiply a number by its inverse with a modulaire you get 1.
Comment has been collapsed.
I've been at this for too long . . . and from what I can make of this:
1) The cipher appears to be fairly obvious (although it's not clear to me whether I should be using the PlainText or encypted version).
2) I think the key can be easily found if you look in the right place (as you suggested).
But, I can't seem to do the basic decryption to the right solution, so I must have something wrong.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, it's been a day ago and only 3 solvers. I guess I gotta step in and help you guys.
HINT OF ALL HINTS: I am the master of misleading people, there are several(not really, just a few) pathways to do this. Some are veery necesary and can help you undersatnd what you're going and some can be ignored if you already have the knowledge. Simply put, if you think you're doing it right but you can't seem to reach the end, find a different way to do it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Decryption is not the hard part. I don't know what to do with it.
Comment has been collapsed.
If I was the one who made the puzzle, I'd make the first step as a first random fact. Oh wait, I did!
Comment has been collapsed.
Yep, been there, learnt about a Frenchman I'd never heard of before, found an example key which may or may not have been a red herring, but couldn't be used successfully in either a tabulated or algebraic method - hence getting confused as to what is real and what is deception.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yep, doesn't help. I've never played with modulo or keys before, and while they're fairly easy to pick up, it's hard to follow when there are rabbit holes along the way, so I have no clue as to whether I'm on the right path or not until I hit the correct solution. Unfortunately for me there are too many possibilities to follow while being blind in doing so (I think I'd be more successful if the path was more clearly linear).
I'll chalk this one up to experience and look forward to seeing the solution.
Comment has been collapsed.
So much time spent on deciphering the whole message... I deciphered it. But for nothing? :( That's plain evil...
Also the "simple hidden thing" did not help at all, even ciphered and deciphered it, and it was still a useless clue.... You can't expect us to be in your mind on what to do after the deciphering. This is crazy man...
Comment has been collapsed.
Deciphering the message is somewhat necessary for people who don't know what they're doing. It can be ignored if you already found the true hidden message.(You already did btw). You probably missed several other hints.
You know hiding can also be done in comments ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
I've read your comments indeed but they helped me not. I seriously don't know what "I'm supposed" to do next, so I'll just wait for the posted solution in the end... This has already took too much of my time, sorry, and it just makes no sense to me what you expect us to do/understand...
Comment has been collapsed.
I think he is just referring to it, in order to demonstrate that it's necessary to also count "0" in the function.. It's just an example.
Comment has been collapsed.
I had actually seen that from the beginning, but never cared to mention it, since it was an example of a function that "would not work" as far as the necessity of 0 goes. :P but oh well...
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm probably blind then, or fail to understand basic things, cause I can't see a single thing that helps in your comments. Anyway I give up...
Comment has been collapsed.
I've seen this a thousand times. :P Does not change anything. xD sorry
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes of course I'm checking what I can on hints. But you guys are obviously a different level than me in puzzle-solving... In any case this is my last post here, I think I've spammed enough... You are all crazy to be able to solve this...
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, sorry to disappoint, but I have no idea of what is even required... :( Found all kinds of hints totally useless in this... :/
Comment has been collapsed.
Not a problem . . . except now you've taken me to your new puzzle which looks very interesting!
You know these puzzles feel a lot like work. I get through one and feel like I deserve a break, and then bang, I'm slapped with another one to tackle. My addictive personality being like a dog with a bone doesn't help as I can't just walk away.
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh I recognize that, and good on them. However from my perspective, this is a puzzle that has a very large number of red herrings, things that look cool, but ultimately go nowhere. This leaves you fundamentally with three options:
1) Get lucky. Happen upon one of the correct paths soon, and hooray, you get there
2) Spend a lot of time. Chase down each of the red herrings, and work out whether it is real
3) Use the hints to eliminate a number of the red herrings, reducing the time commitment to what you have available.
Now I admit it. I am time poor. I have a lot of commitments, and not a huge amount of time, which ruled out option 2 for me, and by chance I was unfortunately not lucky. That left option 3 as MY only route through. Someone else could have ended up on either of the other two options.
From my perspective, I really liked the core mechanic. I liked where and how you chose to hide the Itstoohard code. Frankly, you did not need all of the red herrings to get to a cool puzzle. You had one to start with.
Comment has been collapsed.
I have some leads. But the math part got me so lazyyyyy, and I didn't know how to to decrypt the sentence.
I guess I saw your hint with source if you're talking about the strongs, and I saw that there's a trick somewhere, but I'm lost. Math doesn't make me want to go very far. :c
Comment has been collapsed.
16,284 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by AdJ
1,797 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
23 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by Bigshrimp
493 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by sallachim
205 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by carlica
381 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by OsManiaC
54 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by sensualshakti
21 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Bum8ara5h
11 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by venturercatt
51 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by venturercatt
718 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by canis39
44 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by yugimax
186 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by FranckCastle
29 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by FateOfOne
Jo rzp fuh bhfutcjsv ozu ich vjwhfdfr. Ji jb szi chuh. Vz bhfutc hebhdchuh, mpi mh tzsbjbihsi szi iz dfsahu zoo. Ops ofti: J dfb iurjsv iz lfxh bpuh icfi icjb ahbtujgijzs cfb fee fegcfmhib, mpi J vzi efyr. Fb pbpfe, J vzi efyr fsa J bfja ehi pb Lfxh icjb cfuahu
Zm ---> Zm
x ----> 7x+5
SOLUTION
The games are:
x2 INK
x2 Divekick
x1 Dead State: Reanmianted
x2 Grim Fandango: Remastred added.
Hall of fame:
Random hints/facts
Shoutout to mahv for being smart and solving the hardest part in less than a minute.
** Something for the geeks.
Comment has been collapsed.