48 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by ngoclong19
8 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by adam1224
16,480 Comments - Last post 16 hours ago by Kenruyoh
2,129 Comments - Last post 19 hours ago by MeguminShiro
951 Comments - Last post 23 hours ago by Cauix
54 Comments - Last post 1 day ago by GoatPimp
26 Comments - Last post 1 day ago by lewriczin
14 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by canis39
37 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by UnbakedBacon
55 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by Skwerm
6,508 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by Oppenh4imer
160 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by RePlayBe
86 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Inkyyy
17,199 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by SolvedPack
Please review the previous thread if you missed it.
Based on all the comments, there have been a few updates.
This is a little complicated, so I'll try to explain. When calculating contributor values, the following happens.
Non-Bundle Value = The value of games received, which are not in the above list, as well as any games in the list that were created before the bundle.
Bundle Value = The value of games received, which fall into the above list. They're only included if you created your giveaway after the earliest bundle, meaning there's a possibility of boosting values with these games.
Now the first $25 from the Bundle Value is moved over to Non-Bundle Value. If you have $26 in Bundle Value, and $15 in Non-Bundle Value, it's updated to $1 and $40 in this example. This happens to give new contributors a free pass. Over 200 games have been in bundles, so we don't want users that just started out to lose value because of bad luck. This way, we wait until they've contributed a few more gifts, to get a better sample size.
Total Value = Non-Bundle Value + min(Bundle Value, Non-Bundle Value * 0.2);
The above determines the total value based on those two numbers. The value coming from bundle games can only contribute to 20%.
Profiles are now updated with the new values. Take a look, and let us know if you think this is fair.
Comment has been collapsed.