25 Comments - Last post 39 seconds ago by Chris76de
19 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by DanteOP
161 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by wigglenose
13 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by VicViperV
1,961 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Gamy7
1,042 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by sensualshakti
769 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by OwieczkaDollyv21
23 Comments - Last post 53 seconds ago by JMM72
56 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Fragger
1,333 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Nogift4u
56 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by blueflame32
1,052 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by Bubles
452 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by ucho
6,344 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by Tigerci
Here is a intriguing theory that someone claims:
video1
video2
video3
video4
video5
video6
He claims the fictitious roles are played by using:
Camera Lens Distortion, Makeup, Different Lighting Systems, Prosthetic Based Modifications, Covered Birthmarks and Scars, Hair Wigs, Teeth Covers, Eye Color Change with Eye Contacts, etc.
He says that these people play fictitious roles that are presented as factual reality on some of the news and some other public media events that are believed by the public to be real. He dismisses bulls*it like David Icke's, Disclosure Project and Inelia Benz by prooving they are actors playing roles to fool the masses. He also claims that Obama also played Osama character.
Most of the news are pre-packaged, directed and staged with actors and then sent to TV stations for broadcast as real events.
He claims none of the school shootings were real.
What is your oppinion on his claims?
Note: If you research his claims and they are not true, that's not a big problem, but if you dismiss his claims and they are true, that's of huge importance.
the claimer's website
the claimer's facebook
Comment has been collapsed.