Your account needs to be public for the site to get that information, cg was not sure that forcing people to make their accounts public was the right thing to do.
Unfortunately, it seems there are a fair number of bad apples in here. I'd say it may be for the best to give people the choice of going public, or not being able to take part. These people who're just joining every giveaway are not doing themselves any favours, they're putting a bad taste into the mouths of everyone with some scruples.
Comment has been collapsed.
Then how about this:
Bob enters a giveaway for Magicka, but he already has that, and has his profile set to private. He wins the giveaway, and Bill (the creator of the giveaway) asks him to make his profile public just for some time. When Bill sees that Bob already has the game, he asks cg to reroll the contest.
Comment has been collapsed.
I can understand both sides of the issue, but my personal opinion is that making your profile public as a condition to be eligible to win free games is not unreasonable. I can already see this spiraling out of control as people collaborate to form groups to enter contests, then simply trade the winnings amongst themselves.
Comment has been collapsed.
-_- i already told this idea to CG 2 days ago so ...
Comment has been collapsed.
Sounds good. Also should get rid of the email and only let the giver see your account. Email at most should be used for steam gift account recovery (even that would be dumb since it's used for steam recovery which is used to log in here..)
Comment has been collapsed.
I'd like to be able to filter out what games I already have as well as being able to see a wishlish so if I had a game that only like 5 of the 2600 members really wanted I could make a private giveaway type thing.
Comment has been collapsed.
That'd be nice,. but I don't think it can be made easily.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'd like to know this as well. I know the winner is chosen randomly, but I don't want to give the game to someone who already has it (especially when I specified NOT TO ENTER if they do), and I don't want a negative image for not giving the winner the game.
Comment has been collapsed.
I had sent out the gift, but revoked it (by sending it to myself) when I found out that they already had the game. As such, they have marked as if they received the game.
Just going to send a courteous email saying that that code doesn't work.
Comment has been collapsed.
I admit that when I want to win a game I enter every giveaway that has it. What would be good is that if I win that game, it would withdraw my entries from the other giveaways. I'll do this manually anyway, but still, wouldn't be good to win something I already have if someone else who doesn't have the game could win it.
Comment has been collapsed.
I concur; I entered all the portal giveaways after loosing on 4 giveaways. I check the site frequently to make sure that, in the off chance that I do win, I can withdraw from the others on time and give others a fair (and improved) chance of winning. However, some of the giveaways for the same game end at the same time or very close to one another. Maybe the times should be arranged so that there is a difference of at least 30 mins between giveaways for the same game? There is the possibility, however, that this was designed especially so that people choose one or the other (if giveaways for the same game end at the same time, I usually don't enter both which is the quickest solution to my moral problems).
Comment has been collapsed.
The community itself should start by practising some self discipline by only joining contests for games they don't own.
Comment has been collapsed.
How about in cases of pack giveaways? There one open right now for the Half-Life Anthology, and I would've liked to enter for Opposing Force, Blue Shift and Team Fortress Classic. But I already have Half-Life! :s Oh well, might as well buy them and enter a different giveaway instead.
Comment has been collapsed.
look at the guy FatalErrorVXD who won the Knoxx DLC for Borderlands :P he doesn't even have the game O_O lol...
I think if there would be a minimum Steam rating required to join a giveaway a ton of those multiple accounts would be blocked. Ofcourse it would also hit the ppl that rarely play games :P but ofcourse why enter a giveaway if u don't have time to play the games anyway ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
I think Steam rating though is kind of a joke. What if I am currently playing a non-Steam game (which I am) but have multiple hundreds of dollars invested into Steam. Am I then not allowed to enter giveaways just because I bought a game not through Steam?
Comment has been collapsed.
i agree, that's a bad side-effect. But if somebody is a regular Steam user (the group the site is aimed towards) they ussually do have some hours putt into games. Even when I got 4 non-steam games I play there's always a bit of time I spend on a game like beat hazard, audiosurf, galcon fusion or w/e other game. If you are not active anyway on Steam how could we ever check on the account?
Comment has been collapsed.
66 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by stlpaul
1,234 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by spodamayn
122 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by paco7533
25 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by emsee
47,118 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Fewithor
60 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Gamy7
56 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Mantve
130 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by ceeexo
107 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by ceeexo
211 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by Yamaraus
166 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by insideAfireball
38 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by Cim
900 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by thed4rkn1te
42 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by canis39
I don't want to call out names yet, but it's incredibly shady for people to either enter for games they already have, or leave comments like "IF I WIN CAN YOU SEND THIS TO MY FRIEND BLABLABLA PLS TNX". Knock it off, people, don't we want a positive environment? Don't ruin this.
Comment has been collapsed.