I think we shall get Invite codes back, and as Shindo said - account has to be x month old
Comment has been collapsed.
We had beggars when the site ran on invites, so I don't really understand how bringing them back will get rid of the beggars. The ratio of legitimate users to beggars could possibly still be the same as it was before but there's 2 key factors that are warping the current perspective:
1) If the ratio remains the same (or even goes down a little), then more users will mean more beggars. If there were 100 users and 9 beggars and that changed to 1000 users and 90 beggars then people won't view it as a total population increase, they will just view it as 10 times the number of beggars.
2) Many people didn't/don't like the idea of removing invites, and so they are now more likely to report beggars than before in order to try to "prove" that the new system doesn't work. If you add invites back then you'll likely see the number of people complaining about beggars asking for games decrease, but then you'll have beggars asking for invites.
Comment has been collapsed.
Random idea for alternative options' sake:
I'm not advocating this idea one way or another (haven't thought it through yet). Just throwing it out there.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's an interesting idea but sort of counter-intuitive to the nature of the site. If a person can only afford to buy $10 games, then they are the ones who are most deserving of winning a $60 game. This would make it so that only the people who have proven they can afford to pay for the game being given away can enter. This of course makes the site more about the greed of getting what you can already afford for free, rather than the generosity of giving to those who can't afford it.
Note that this is just one of the stances against your idea and there are certainly both good and bad things about it, but I just wanted to get the most obvious negative aspect mentioned and out of the way.
Comment has been collapsed.
I was going to mention this myself, but figured it was obvious enough. For those of you not aware: the value of your account is not based on how much a game cost when you bought it, but how much it costs to buy at the present moment. That $60 boost to your account from Skyrim will eventually only be a $20 boost.
Comment has been collapsed.
I didn't notice your name so I kept thinking you started all you sentences with, "Arrgh" and I'm sitting here who the hell is this guy, Charlie Brown?
Comment has been collapsed.
20 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by coloralp
127 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by JMM72
33 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by Spudette
222 Comments - Last post 56 minutes ago by Pika8
60 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by XfinityX
3 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by wigglenose
47,119 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Sh4dowKill
45 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by DrTenma
16,816 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by Operations
180 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by ThePonz
758 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by PoeticKatana
9,559 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
62 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by eeev
25 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by snow0815
22:11 - : dude im kinda desperate right now
22:11 - Aargh!: why is that?
22:12 - : i dont wanna spend gift on 2nd acc
22:12 - : so im here again
22:12 - : and im asking you: would you be that kind and help me out?
22:13 - Aargh!: I already told you I'm not gonna helpyou cheat the system
22:13 - : the thing is
22:13 - : im gonna do it anyway)
22:13 - : i have to do it
22:13 - Aargh!: Maybe you will, but not with my help
22:14 - : humm i see that deep principles
22:14 - : i like it
22:14 - Aargh!: if it's that much of a problem for you to cheat up a lousy $50 account, you've got bigger things to worry about than free games
22:14 - : but cmon
22:15 - Aargh!: So spare yourself the humiliation of begging fo gifts and just accept that I'm not going to help you.
22:15 - : i dont want to spend money on something i can have free
22:15 - : i will never use other acc for playin
22:15 - : anyway, got to try
22:15 - Aargh!: Go try somewhere else
22:18 - : dude you dont understand
22:19 - : but its not needed to explain
22:19 - : just tell me that you wont report me
22:19 - Aargh!: now you made me curious, what is it I don't understand?
22:20 - : you dont understand my situlation
22:20 - : or my relationships
22:21 - Aargh!: I think I understand well enough. You got banned from SteamGifts so now you're trying to cheat up a fake $50 account to get back in
22:21 - ****: yes thats correct
--
For the record, I'm not suggesting that raising the barrier of entry would stop beggars. I can deal with beggars, that's not the issue.
What I am suggesting that raising the barrier (to $100 or $150, which is nothing outrageous to the average Steam-user) would make it much more difficult for people to cheat the system. Would it completely stop people? Of course not. But at $50 it is in my opinion far too easy to create dummy accounts to in order to circumvent site bans and/or illegally raising your chance to win by using multiple accounts to enter giveaways.
Comment has been collapsed.