A fun strategic upgrade to Steam Gifts...

No

Everyone would just use all his points (300p) in each giveaway he enters to have the highest chance possible. It's not hard to wait until you got another 300 points, so it wouldn't really change anything.

Nope.

No.

"That wouldn't be fair"

Pfft, it'd be the same fair it is now; everybody gets the exact same amount of points. Everybody would have the option to enter one giveaway ten times or enter ten giveaways one time each.

On the other hand it could be argued that with this rule, there'd be a bigger chance of the winner being someone who actually wants the game and not someone who blindly enters everything because hey, the points are free and are coming in faster than I can spend them!

But I think it really wouldn't change much (except for the number of entries on the giveaways) because points are coming in fast enough that you could still enter a lot of giveaways ten times...

No.

Damn, can't remember if I already posted it here. Here it comes anyway :
Burnout Paradise $100CV

Feel free to share/leak

Yes.

WTF, NO. This is "Steamgifts" not "Galagiveaways".

I don't get why people want to "merge" sites ...
Having 2 (or more) sites is not good enough for you? Use 1 or more or none. You can choose whatever you want ...

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN

No.

I like the idea! You really cannot equate it with Galagiveaways. There ist a 10-entries-restriction and 300P-max-restriction.
The fortune you gain here,
you will loose on another. It's like Gainja said above. Overall-Fairness wouldn't be damaged ...but AAA-Titles would be stormed probably.

Nooo I don't want another Galagiveaways

Why is everyone saying it'd be like GalaGiveaways? Incorrect. GalaGiveaways only has the Extra Odds option on some giveaways, not all. Besides, why would it have to be a max on 10 entries here? Could be less, say 5.

how about people stop trying to suggest how to break the site

no!

I like the idea, assuming it's an option enabled by the giveaway creator, the same way group or contributor giveaways are. Some people like "one entry per person" but as a contributor I prefer it when the winner actually wants the game. This system would favour those actually interested in the game. I understand why people oppose it, but I think if it's up to the person giving away the game it's hard to have a problem with it.