Would it be useful to you?
I don't support the idea mostly for one reason: It would result in people wasting no effort or interest entering primarily giveaways for better games, increasing the chances that these games end up with winners who don't actually care about them. Or at least less than many others.
We already have some search parameters, we have the option to hide and to wishlist. It is absolutely possible to navigate SG without even more guidance.
Comment has been collapsed.
145 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by DeliberateTaco
12 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Foxhack
1,388 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Delisper
880 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by sensualshakti
15,575 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by devotee
44 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by adveniat
563 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by XxSeRyIxX
37 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by kctan
70 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by vinirockman
13 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by gonsi
44 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by hbouma
17 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by Lugum
2,474 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by JMM72
10 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by BlackbeardXIII
With the recent flood of bad games giveaways, asset flips, achievement spammers, etc. and the rare happening of decent bundles, I started to think how we could exclude those "games" from our daily SG browsing but yet be able to find those rare gems that even when they cost a few bucks can still provide a lot of fun. One Finger Death Punch is just one quick example.
Filtering through giveaway value or metascore can be quite unpractical, especially when browsing from different devices and mobile.
I realised that a new category that filters games based on number of Steam reviews and overall game rating, which threshold could be set by me, would quickly become my only browsed category after wishlisted.
See the images below to see how it could look like.
And have a giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.