ok fine :P maybe not kill it completely, but i dont think this CV system can survive much longer without some changes made to it though :o bundled list turned into a list of games that nobody wants to make giveaways for, and i dont think thats too healthy for a site dedicated to giving games away (:
we already have like 4,500 things on that bundled list, and its growing fast. Soon enough only non bundled games will be new AAA releases :P
Comment has been collapsed.
No?
The way how it works now, is that giveaway restriction (region) doesn't affect CV value at all.
What you suggest is that ROW giveaways (aka NA + Europe) would give full unbundled CV, and Russia restricted gifts would give 15%, assuming game is -80% for us and -96% for them.
What I would do if I were Russian was to create a private giveaway group, invite other Russians only, then make my restricted gifts as ROW ones, because only Russians will join anyway.
And this is mentioned in the OP as well.
Is that what you want? Because you will get that with your idea.
Comment has been collapsed.
Re-read what I said...I never said NA+EU would give full unbundled CV.
"I know it doesn't solve the whole CV and games being bundled issue, but it would make me happy."
It allows me to create giveaways to people in regions with similar prices.
Comment has been collapsed.
But wouldn't groups like that be pretty easy to discover, and then if they are discovered they could be permabanned for blatantly exploiting the system. That would seem to me a pretty good deterent for such behavior.
Comment has been collapsed.
I doubt, before the region system people used to giveaway restricted stuff anyway
Comment has been collapsed.
Then it would hurt ones that want to pay more for ROW copy just to give it away.
Yes, not many people are doing that, but here are ones that do. And they would be victims of something they have no control over. Region lock is already a pain in the ass.
Comment has been collapsed.
but bundling games just because of russian prices are hurting much more ppl, am i right ?
there will be always collateral damage, so isnt that more fair ? if im correct with the numbers of course (if the rusians have better sales more restrictions here wont hurt that much)
Comment has been collapsed.
Thing is, Poland region is very unusual because it comes from those few games given away locally in magazines and so. They're not considered for getting onto bundle list, and we don't have region-restricted steam store, so we could fall into EU+NA region.
Comment has been collapsed.
I haven't heard a sound solution to this problem yet so I guess we just have to live with it. By the way with Enhanced Steam it's quite easy to predict which games will most likely end up on the Bundle list.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
I would like your thoughts on this idea:
One of my ideas is to also lock by regions but only for the "now considered bundled games". For instance, Russia (one of the most common regions where games have a discount over 95% making them bundled) has a huge discount on Witcher 3. Let's says 96% of the original price, making the game bundled for everyone on SG. Instead, all users, from the region where such discount is applicable, cannot create a GA for that game without any region restrictions (they can create GAs for that game). For users of other regions, the game should be considered as non-bundled.
What do you think? Is it fair?
EDIT: I think it is more fair than the current option. Some people say that an user can obtain that game by trading or by buying it on another site. But why would he? If it is a lot cheaper in his region.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's good for you (us), not good for them. I'd feel really sad if I were Russian, and I couldn't create a giveaway for people from my region (other Russians) only because it got heavy discount.
Not fair, considering all users, and not only ROW ones.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think what he's suggesting is that people from a restricted region wouldn't be able to create GAs for that games with other region restrictions than their own.
It would also prevent them from buying a ROW copy from other stores than Steam and give it away restriction free but I'm not sure how often that actually happens.
Comment has been collapsed.
You got a point there :) Actually considering how easy it is to check in advance if a game is going to end up on the Bundle list due to discounts and for the lack of reasonable solutions I have no problem with the CV system as it is. Just a little bored to see the same thread pop up over and over again...
Comment has been collapsed.
well i hate to disagree with you, but i see a huge problem with current cv system :P
Most games that have been rarely bundled (or bundled long time ago) are very rare specie here. Games that have been added to bundled list because of cheaper region prices share their fate. Not to mention, theres almost half of steam on the list already :o
so i really see it as a problem, because it discourages people giving away games from bundled list and im not really surprised to see so few, if any giveaways for abovementioned games.
being on bundled list means nothing to a game thats classified as bundle ho (?!: P), and theres tons of games that have been in like 12 bundles already. But there are also quite a few, awesome games that have been bundled once a year or two ago, or were super cheap in RU region in the past.
Those games are pretty much lost for sg because not many people are going to buy a $5 - $10 game thats on the bundled list and gives as much CV as $1 bundle :P Thats why i said id like cv to go away completely, or make some changes to it, so it doesnt actually stop people from giving games away.
Comment has been collapsed.
Doesn't seem fair though. Why would those people be restricted from gifting ROW copies? For people that gift only for CV it might not matter, but pple from region locked regions which are in groups/friends with people from ROW region would be hurt. They already have trouble getting ROW gifts.
I remember reading a suggestion about the giveaway giving CV based on the entrants region (i.e. if all entrants in the giveaway are from the same region locked region, the CV given to the gifter is that of a region locked gift, even if the giveaway was marked as ROW), but I don't know if it got somewhere.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm confused.
all users, from the region where such discount is applicable, cannot create a GA for that game without any region restrictions
As I read it, it means they can't create ROW giveaways for that game... Or do you mean they can create any GA, but their CV will be considered as bundled regardless?
Comment has been collapsed.
It would just cause inviting one guy into 100-entries russian group, that would join every giveaway, while having 1% chance to win. And if he did, he'd either ask for reroll (sigh), or ask giveaway creator to delete giveaway.
Not a solution, abusable, as hell.
Comment has been collapsed.
What about a certain % instead of all? Ofc that would create issues by itself as well.
Comment has been collapsed.
Whatever percent you put birdie, it would still be abusable, just more or less.
Put high percent like 90% -> would cause situation like I explained above.
Put medium percent like 50% -> would be unfair if I have e.g. majority of Russians in my group, yet we're ROW group.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
You could select anything, also some people's profile don't show it, I don't know if the selected region is even public.
Comment has been collapsed.
SG knows your region (based on IP)
steam knows your region (based on IP and your payment system)
but it's a private info.
Comment has been collapsed.
Not really. Unbundled games auto-inflate their value by way of having more people enter for them. It tends to be pretty good at self-regulating to cost.
Besides, enough people complaining about having too many points- and that's the flip side, if point cost decreases, you'll have even worse odds per giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.
Unfortunately:
Comment has been collapsed.
More than 1 account is forbidden and it should be suspended.
Comment has been collapsed.
Main account wouln't be signed to SG or someone can .... duck the system , sigh :(
Comment has been collapsed.
Mmm, that could work. It's a downside for the user, though, since Russia is probably the region with the most region restricted gibs.
Comment has been collapsed.
Who said that gift wouldn't be given to another Russia mate? :)
F.ex private links or groups :)
Comment has been collapsed.
One would think people would get that without needing to mention it ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
all users, from the region where such discount is applicable, cannot create a GA for that game without any region restrictions
Rather, they'd count as bundled, rather than being locked out entirely.
However, the person in question can still just trade the games to a non-RU account to post up, in trade for ROW games, so someone could still exploit off them.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't see why not? In fact, so many cheats here on sg multi-account, that even just trading to a VPN-activated secondary account may be feasible.
But even that aside, scammers are going to try to scam. scammers are by nature duplicitous, entitled, and destructive, they're going to prefer to try and find a way to break the system rather than adjust to it, when things come to crutch.
Comment has been collapsed.
all users, from the region where such discount is applicable, cannot create a GA for that game without any region restrictions. For users of other regions, the game should be considered as non-bundled.
no, it's not fair, and it's annoying for region-locked people. no need to leave us out of row GAs.
if users feel that bundlers are unfair, just pick games with average discounts instead of pushing it to the limit, like waiting till it hits 80% or more.
it's funny how most people complaining about bundles claim that they don't care about cv, but they give away stuff heavily discounted.
Comment has been collapsed.
I say we just keep everything the way it is. Or completely remove levels. That would be the only fair choice.
Comment has been collapsed.
To be honest, I'd rather see people abuse it to get to 10 instead of seeing legitimate users have their CV randomly drop because a game got bundled from a region locked area so the majority couldn't even benefit from it anyhow.
Comment has been collapsed.
all users, from the region where such discount is applicable, cannot create a GA for that game without any region restrictions - that bassically kills anyone living in such a region from participation in non-Russian SG community. He cannot give away games in ROW groups, in ROW puzzles, events etc - even if he manages to get a ROW copy especially to give it away to ROW people. Better (but not perfect - still punishing russians who buy ROW copy for ROW GA) sollution is - if game was 95%+ in your region - all your GAs for this game no matter if ROW or region-restricted gives you 15% value. That being said - it still doesn't solve all problems, yet problems present are less common. But still present:
(I used Russian as an example, as they got most "bundle-value-discounts" but this is applicable to all other regions as well)
Comment has been collapsed.
then you chose your words wrong ;p because what you said is that if game gets 95% off (comparing to US) in Russia all russian users can only make restricted GAs for it and only receive 15% value ;) if they already can only receive 15% value why bother with regional GAs - give them 15% for ROW but allow them to make ROWs ;)
Still - the problems listed remains ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
Your idea has two flaws.
First of all, in your first EDIT you noticed right thing - there are people who live in restricted regions and still want to giveaway ROW games, buying them from traders. Suggested system would discourage them.
And this would not protect from people from ROW regions that would want to exploit CV by buying restricted gifts and giving them away in closed group.
And, I do believe that people that give away good games in most cases do this to bring happiness, not to gain CV. Look at level 10 users - they can't get more CV than they had, but they are still giving. So, I don't think that bundling of games because of regional prices is a real problem.
Comment has been collapsed.
All discussions about improving the cv-sytem are pointless....cause the system itself is pointless.
Maybe soon nearly every game discounted 80% or maybe even 75% will count as bundled...whats the point of the CV anyway?
The only purpose of the resulting level is to use in in setting up your giveaways and restrict it to level x+
This horse is dead....let it die.
It would be more usefull, to implement some things....like in sgtools...maybe less strict. Some kind of ratio-check (won/given)..maybe also with timebased templates, like check ratio in the last 6 month and maybe other things like combine group+hidden and so on
Comment has been collapsed.
10 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by CryinOrion
259 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Wok
83 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by zfazek
39 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Chris76de
14 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by sensualshakti
179 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by ashtwo
380 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by CelestialFrog
52 Comments - Last post 17 seconds ago by herbesdeprovence
17,039 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Operations
72 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by Helgrind22
45 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by Moogal
42 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by skadogg
9,786 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ayuinaba
121 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Tewam
In regard to a discussion I created who got a bit out of hand, mostly by users who didn't read that I asked why and "Was the discount in another region over 90%/95%?" I decided to create this thread: to look for good suggestions to improve the current "system" on SG.
One of the flaws of the current "system" is that bigger discounts in locked regions affect the status of the games (if it is 95% or over compared to the original $ price the game will be considered as bundled). But if the mechanism wasn't in place a lot of users could take advantage of it as pointed out by "TheShobo": "If we add regions to the bundled status people in the discounted regions would just create private groups with 'region free' giveaways"
I would like to read your ideas and criticism (please be constructive).
One of my ideas is to also lock by regions but only for the "now considered bundled games". For instance, Russia (one of the most common regions where games have a discount over 95% making them bundled) has a huge discount on Witcher 3. Let's says 96% of the original price, making the game bundled for everyone on SG. Instead, all users, from the region where such discount is applicable, cannot create a GA for THAT game without any region restrictions or if he could but it would count as bundled for him. For users of other regions, the game should be considered as non-bundled.What do you think? Is it fair?EDIT: I think it is more fair than the current option. Some people say that an user can obtain that game by trading or by buying it on another site. But why would he? If it is a lot cheaper in his region.EDIT 2: A lot of games would regain the non-bundled status again which would motivate more users to create GAs for those games.EDIT3: My suggestion still has lot of flaws
Comment has been collapsed.