who's winner
56 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by Gamy7
239 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by pb1
1,440 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by FranckCastle
46,853 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by whitepai
454 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by FranckCastle
15,440 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by MarvashMagalli
559 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by svecka
91 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Navaro
15,201 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Adzik
32 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by FEGuy
498 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by FallenKal
102 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by WickedVisage
2,313 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by Atro
116 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Karfein
Thanks for the giveaway! ✔
Comment has been collapsed.
Thx you for Giveways !
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks
Comment has been collapsed.
thanks for the chance!!!
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you!
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the GA.
I want to advice that you set a minimum level for your future GAs because each one that gave one, not free, game is, at least, level 1.
Easy solution to hold the worst rulesbreakers, win resellers, autojoiner user and bots outside (40% of the level 0 accounts have infractions for unactivated or multiple wins + the ammount of used autojoiners are much more as in higher levels).
And besides that it lowers the cases of problems with your winners.
You can check accounts/your winners with:
http://www.sgtools.info/activation
http://www.sgtools.info/multiple-wins
If someone have red marks there request a reroll and put the link(s) into the support ticket.
https://www.steamgifts.com/stats/community/users
Scroll down to the bottom and look at the "per level" info and you see 970k are level 0, only around 165k have a level, 113k of them are level 1. So around 15% of the members from sg gave something and only 4% gave more as 5 games.
Have a nice day
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the game and thanks for allowing 0 level accounts to participate, unlike that guy suggestion above >.>
Comment has been collapsed.