Considering its an opinionated comment suggesting that a great enough actual wins to estimated wins ratio would be 2 is acceptable. Last I checked this is not a forum for discussing exact figures, however if you wished to try to justify why regarding such a ratio as unlucky enough you would have to calculate what one standard deviation in regards to a greater or lesser ratios between actual and estimated wins is equal to and then justify how many standard deviations out a person has to be to be considered unlucky (the most common chosen value is 2 since approx since only 5% of people are a greater quantity of standard deviations off 0 of which 2.5% of people would be less lucky). This in itself is not particularly hard except that due to the nature of ratios you would actually have to use a logarithmic model of the normal distribution curve (lognormal distribution curve). So in short in two opinionated forum posts saying that both a specific ratio which I can justify and a great enough figure (I have already stated what I believe that to be) should be used to determine when to consider QQing is completely acceptable.

There is no reason why adding the words "at least something like" to my original post would add value to my point as the word "reaches" implies that any value beyond that would be justifiable as it has met the criteria and reached the stated value.

And like I said in my previous post I am well aware that the intentions of the OP were to conceal the giveaway in a thread that diverts attention but I personally believe there would be many far better choices for thread topics that conceal giveaways than a QQ thread ever can, although I accept that the OP might feel differently about it I personally do not encourage or look overly kindly on such topics being used for this kind of purpose.