ofc - bot is only as efficient as very active user - they both have the same point regeneration. I for example almost always use up all my points and very rarelly do I hit 300p, so in theory I'm as effective as any of your mentioned bots/scripts. It all depends on points regeneration and point value of games you enter into. Thus loooking at just raw number of GAs entered is not really telling you much either. Because if I enter 3 60p GAs and your bot/script enter 36 5p GAs in the same time - we both were efficient in the same way, while his numbers will be 3 times higher.
Comment has been collapsed.
well, the 2016k train was live for 3 weeks i think. so, it's possible someone entered 1000GA in one week.
Comment has been collapsed.
Possible? Yes. Without a bot? Not likely. As to the RNG, I have no idea, but I can share a WoW-related anecdote. My Reins of the Raven Lord dropped on my 136th attempt, whereas my Ashes of Al'ar dropped on the first try. A friend of mine gave up on the Deathcharger's Reins after literally 1000 attempts, whereas I got mine accidentally on a second run whilst farming runecloth and a second one on my druid on the 12th farming run (I was multiboxing).
Comment has been collapsed.
2,517 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Provos
48 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Ryuugan
147 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Reidor
23 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Happyleaf
486 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Yorickmeister
142 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Fluffster
19 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by zeprfrew
4,709 Comments - Last post 40 seconds ago by CultofPersonalitea
55 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by harisssss
26 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by VictorWu
2 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Tenn
19 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Ch1cWolf
104 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Yamaraus
26 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Orbs
...and can a new user win at a rate of one GA a day (on average) without selling his/her soul to the RNG devil?
O.GA
Comment has been collapsed.