"If the same number of people enter the same number of giveaways, spending the same number of points in the process, the overall odds will be the same regardless of number of entries per person."

Not really. To make it simple, imagine you have 30 points left. You see a giveaway of game A for 10 points and you really want game A. You then see two other giveaways of games B and C for 10 points each. You think they look alright but don't really love those games. With the current system, you could enter for game A and have 20 points left. You could then stop, or do what most people do and enter for B and C as well, because you have the points to spare.

Now if you could enter three times in a giveaway, you would of course spend all your 30 points on game A. This would not only increase your own chances of winning game A, it would also increase the chances of people that enter for B and C because they really want those games. Not to mention that if they spend more points on B and C, they won't enter for game A if they don't really want it, which increases your odds (and everyone else's odds who really want game A).

This just give you the option to control where you put your odds, and like you said, it's a closed system so the fairness of it won't change. Happy days!

The way also everyone gets games they dont want to.This site is about people giving away games to people who most wants it.

I want portal.But i joined Red Nation giveaway just because there was no available portal giveaways.I won red nation,not portal.

Boo-hoo. You don't have something to spend your free imaginary points on. I sit on 300 all the time. Just means you never have to worry about having enough to enter for something. Enjoy it. I don't know where people get this idea that you should feel compelled to spend all your points as quickly as possible. If there's nothing you want, there's nothing you want. Completely fucking up the site mechanics just so you can feel like you're not 'wasting' your precious free points that you get in infinite supply is an amazingly shitty idea.

This is the first sane reason for a negative response. I appreciate how you're also open to the idea if only it were limited to pub giveaways :> Also, not a lot of ppl get this, despite being mentioned over and over: those that spend all their points on 1 particular giveaway will fail to enter ANY other, thus increasing other people's chances at those other giveaways. What's your take on this? Also, no one mentioned this, but cases like that guy that won same game twice because he entered for his friend and himself.. will hopefully go away.

Yeah. The reason not to do it is simply this: abusers. Probably, it would also encourage the creation of multiple accounts (for more chances) and fake giveaways (for more points).

We all get the same amount of points and are free to spend them as we wish. If someone chooses to sit on their points, they're free to do so, and at the same time, it means they are not entering giveaways which means they increase the chances of the people that have entered said giveaways.