The term "legal" means concerning the law of a country so it doesn't quite apply to rules of a site etc.
Which EggShen could have explained in the first place.
Comment has been collapsed.
Had "legal" been some technical or obscure term I would have explained it. As you said the site rules are the relevant point here and in this case have no relation to legality. One area where there is an overlap that commonly causes issues is the concept of free speech. On a private site such as this (private in that membership is required as opposed to say imgur where anyone can post) you have no such right but it's still common for people to claim that moderation is infringing on that right. Freedom of speech relates to governmental restrictions not private ones.
Comment has been collapsed.
The user OP was complaining about would have had over 100 giveaway slots though.
Comment has been collapsed.
deleting GA is not against the rules. It may have been a dick move, but nothing illegal.
If he decides to use it in the future for CV fraud on the other hand it may be considered rulebreaking, but this you don't know. Maybe he simply wanted to BL people who farmed high level using region locked GAs only.
Comment has been collapsed.
Just report them. Maybe similar things will happen often enough with this person that they'll ban him in future because of inappropiate behaviour but don't hold your breath.
As far as the blacklisting goes, they can bl whoever they want.
Comment has been collapsed.
Deleting a giveaway isn't against the rules, but creating a fake or misleading giveaway is, regardless of the reason it was created.
Report the user, explaining fully what happened, so that there's a ticket on file if it happens again.
I personally find it disgusting that people choose to discriminate based on region on this site. In this day and age, we should be trying to get past that asinine bullshit, not encouraging it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nothing against SG ToS - you're allowed to blacklist whoever you want, at anytime you want, for no reason. You're also allowed to delete giveaway before it finishes. The only actual incident I remember is when somebody intentionally put lots of ads and referals in one popular giveaway to lure people and then decided to delete giveaway prior to finish to avoid sending win, but that can be considered no actual willing of making giveaway in first place, and that equals to fake giveaways, which is against rules.
Thing is, you can't easily tell which case is accident, and which case is not willing to deliver gift, unless you have strong argument such as guy stating it himself. There is literally nothing stopping that guy from stating that the key turned out to be e.g. invalid, so he deleted the giveaway, and blacklists have nothing to do with that.
TL;DR - Unless he does that on usual basis, you can't really do anything. Of course you can report it and let support deal with it, but they also won't suspend that user only because he deleted the giveaway, unless he's doing that all the time.
Comment has been collapsed.
also giveaway creator from another region, but intentionally changed country flag in steam profile to RU.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nope, blacklisting user after he entered doesn't change anything in terms of giveaway - he's eligible for win. Creator is also free to delete giveaway and re-do it if he wishes that blacklisted entry to be invalid. That's not a sign of fake giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.
ITSaTRAP.gif
Well, he did nothing punishable, maybe you should bookmark his profile and check in a month if something fishy happens :p
Comment has been collapsed.
Creating a giveaway without the intention of delivering the game is against the site rules. Report the giveaway if you have concrete evidence. The key word here is evidence, however. Blacklisting by itself does not prove anything - users can blacklist anyone for any reason. Deleting the giveaway which was created by accident is not against the rules, as well.
Comment has been collapsed.
This is not concrete evidence and won't suffice for the admins to take actions against said user. However, you can still make a user report, stating your suspicion. If the same thing happens again, done by the same user - for example for another region - it would no longer look like this was a one-time accident, but instead done with intent. Maybe in this case the moderators would treat this case differently.
Comment has been collapsed.
Of course it is evidence when it happened to everyone in that giveaway. Single blacklists can happen for all kind of reasons. Blacklisting all (or almost all) entries from one trap GA should be evidence enough. I mean what other kind of evidence could there possibly be, besides a confession of guilt?
Comment has been collapsed.
As i said, it is not concrete evidence. It's suspicious (that's probably why this thread exists) but it's not concrete evidence to justify any measures taken against that user.
At this point, yes, only "a confession of guilt" would be sufficient.
Why the user blacklisted everyone before they deleted the giveaway is unknown. Just because they blacklisted everbody doesn't mean their intention was to not deliver the giveaway initially.
Comment has been collapsed.
Even if every entry went into his blacklist, that still is not enough to warrant a suspension. Let me give a couple examples. Let's say, Alice creates a Bad Rats giveaway, Bob and Charlie enter the giveaway:
If the giveaway creator blacklisted you and deleted the giveaway, it might be a dick move, but I think you would not want to win games from someone like him anyway, so there's no loss here.
Comment has been collapsed.
This made me think of a way to prevent autojoiners.
Create a good gib, write down in description that you blacklist people who enter before GA reaches "x time remaining" and actually blacklist anyone who enters before that time. You get rid of accounts auto joining on your GAs and of a few people who don't bother reading your stuff you put effort in.
OR you create a giveaway with the description "this GA is for blacklisting autojoiners, it will be deleted in <time> and will be re-created to actually give away".
That would work SleepyCat wouldn't it?
Comment has been collapsed.
OR you create a giveaway with the description "this GA is for blacklisting autojoiners, it will be deleted in <time> and will be re-created to actually give away".
That will most certainly be treated as "Creating a giveaway without the intention of delivering the game" and would be against the siterules.
However something like this* was done by many users before with cheap game keys, that they then just delivered to whoever won the giveaway and then they went on to blacklist every entry.
But everybody who does this will run out of blacklistspots pretty quickly as only ~15% of the people read descriptions anyway.
Comment has been collapsed.
didn't think of the cheap game delivery and even though it's cheap a leecher is gonne get it probably :/
I meant like deleting the GA because it was "created by accident" since you intend to deliver the game anyway, just on the re-created GA. But the cheap GA method seems better :)
Comment has been collapsed.
you could avoid any trouble with rules and just make giveaways with $1 bundles, then deliver the game and blacklist everyone that fell into your trap.
most idiots using autojoin probably don't care which games they enter, they just leech to idle cards.
Comment has been collapsed.
Actually I do something like this. Sometimes I write "no bot-like thank messages" at description, then blacklist all who do that.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you create a honeypot giveaway and blacklist anyone who enters, but still deliver the game in the end, there's no rules violation here. If you make a giveaway and write "I will blacklist anyone who enters; you won't get the game!" - then this is fake giveaway and it might result in a suspension.
Comment has been collapsed.
Most hostility related to Russians around here seems to be towards the low-level regifters and people who run away with keys to the nearest G2A store. (And, well, it would be hard to deny that Russia has an unhealthy overrepresentation in this segment on SG.) Targeting the highest-level user base with an obviously easy bait game seems like some unjustifiable childish hatred with no real reason though. (And I cannot even think of a reason of what beef would a Chinese guy have with Russians…)
Sadly it would be nigh impossible to find actual evidence that it was a trap with no intention of sending out the game. But this is really a new low for this site.
Comment has been collapsed.
1,528 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by LinustheBold
39 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by klingki
48 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by nguyentandat23496
1,846 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by MeguminShiro
454 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Rosefildo
16,316 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by kungfujoe
104 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by WaxWorm
69 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Sumnium
19 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by hbarkas
740 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by GameZard
824 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Bum8ara5h
50 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by xurc
31 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by aquatorrent
72 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Cjcomplex
Sup guys.
Long story short, one guy (don't gonna use finger pointing here) created public Mafia III GA for RU-CIS region and for 7+ lvl.
Then, he proceeded to blacklist everyone who enters, and after that he deleted GA because "accident".
Even changed country flag in steam profile to RU, I'm assuming, to lure more people in.
Is it legal activity? GA was not intended to carry on, it was a trap in the first place, to determinate and blacklist major part of active RU-CIS steamgifts users for, maybe, future frods with region locks?
What do admins think?
Comment has been collapsed.