because people asked and the website has nothing to do with this one
Comment has been collapsed.
Wasn't exactly removed.
They moved the link from the top of the page to the new guidelines.
Comment has been collapsed.
so what? steamgifts is about giving, not trading. People gift games to random strangers. Some give high value gifts, some low value gifts. Some people don't give at all, and only take.
Even without steamtrades, If I buy a bundle, I keep the games I want, and only gift the ones I'm not interested in. How is that any different?
Comment has been collapsed.
It is different.
Only SG --> You buy 10 game bundle, activate 5 games, giveaway 5 games.
SG and ST --> You buy 10 game bundle, activate 5, trade other 3 and activate traded games, giveaway 2 games.
I know it is not against rules or something like that. I just think it kills the soul of the SG system.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's not different just because you came up with a random theory :P
You could say the same way, someone has no money but items and also wants to do giveaways
and trades them for games to give away here
In addition, more than 80% of all bundle games have no trade value and they abound.... in the long run, most of them end up in giveaways anyway, also ST gives you more games for your money, which means that if someone really wants to do giveaways, they can give away so much more
The only thing that can be said that ST reduces the number of "good" games that are given away from people using both ST and SG and only from these and even then it does not affect everyone
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, yours are random theories as well :)
You could say...
Are you talking about Steam Inventory items? They can sell them, then gift games here.
In addition...
If they end up in giveaways anyway, no need to bother with trading :) If i understand correctly, ST gives you more games because you trade an unbundled game for multiple bundled games, right? I personally think that is not a good idea and i believe most people would prefer unbundled game giveaway over bundled ones.
The only...
Well, i have a different "theory" as you read above. I think it kills the SG system (as i said before) which means it affects everyone.
Comment has been collapsed.
i have listed this because your theory doesnt include anything that ST could do good and only went in one direction
I only said that there can be more, which is particularly advantageous for people with little money and also for everyone else because it means more giveaways
The problem is that you assume that SG and ST users are the same the people who trade are not here for SG they may also use it
...or rather that the ST user would do giveaways here if ST didnt exist. The most wouldnt, because they wouldnt even be here
They certainly prefer that but actually everyone can be happy that something is given away...getting Free stuff but claims ..mehh
These arent really theories i have been using both sides for roughly 8 years now almost exclusively for trading and I know pretty well what people do with the games they buy especially if they got them from me :p
The SG system is not killed by it ...it benefits from it and certainly has a few disadvantages as a result
SG is killed by completely different things, or there are things that have a lot more influence cough groups/groupgiveaways cough
Comment has been collapsed.
I am not an old user, little more than a year. And even tho i heard "SG is dying" a lot, i didn't see its glorious times so i can't say something about that.
About ST, I don't say close ST completely. I mean it is completely ok if someone only trades.
I just say it is better to remove ST button from SG site. It doesn't make sense to have both icons because of reasons as i explained above. Honestly, i don't think there are a considerable amount of people who uses ST to give more/better etc. on SG.
Comment has been collapsed.
you're basically saying I'm an asshole because I don't give away enough games.
If I buy a bundle with 10 games, keep 2, trade 3, and give away 5 you think it's wrong because I could have given away 8 games. But I'm still giving away 5 games, which is 5 more than I have to. I could just as easily have gone to bundle splits, and shared the bundle, only buying the games I want, and not giving away anything. Or I could activate the games myself, even if I have no interest in playing them..
Besides, maybe I wouldn't have bought the bundle just for those 2 games. Maybe I only bought the bundle knowing I'd get those 2 games and that I could trade for something more to make it worthwhile.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think they broke the site because if you goto it now all you can do is view your profile, you can't post or view trades from what im seeing so the site serves no purpose now
Comment has been collapsed.
This simply isn't true. Look at my record as an example. I trade regularly and have for years. I found SG through ST, not the other way around. But I've also given away many games (though I've done less of each since my daughter was born a few years back).
You sound like you think trading and giving serve the same function. But to me they don't at all. I'm not rich, so I try to make my dollars count. If I buy a bundle, I'm likely to trade the parts of it I don't want so that my limited money goes farther. In contrast, I don't give things away on SG as a benefit maximizing strategy. And, well, that's probably a good thing because I haven't done so well winning things here! (My profile informs me that I've "been unlucky, and won 7 fewer gifts than estimated since [I] first joined." I had no idea!)
Comment has been collapsed.
It is indeed, and thank you! She's actually three now, but my online activities drop off suddenly about three years ago and have been coming back only slowly.
Comment has been collapsed.
It was time. I've been thinking about removing the link from the navigation for a while and in a recent discussion a number of people expressed similar thoughts. Only a small percentage of our users participate in both communities, so it simply didn't make sense for the link to be displayed in such a prominent location in the navigation. It also seemed to cause confusion with some users believing SteamGifts support could assist with issues on SteamTrades when that is not the case.
Comment has been collapsed.
I have never scammed anybody or been scammed since I joined.
Comment has been collapsed.
It isn't a scam. That's sort of like saying "Mexico City is a scam" because you can get scammed there. There's a good trading community operating over there. Many worthwhile trades take place. I made four trades there this month. There are also some scammers hanging about. But I was only ever scammed once, out of a very low value item, and that was years back when the sites were still connected.
In several ways, I prefer ST to Barter.vg or other competitors.
Comment has been collapsed.
sadly that's kinda agreeing on the argument, that SteamTrades does not give any support. Its basically just a Wild West of scamming, lowballing and fake trusts.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes there is. ô.o Have you ever tried getting support there? You can only hope, that the community votes right on false -reps, that's it.
Comment has been collapsed.
"SteamTrades doesn't have any Support."
"But SteamTrades doesn't have any Support!"
"...."
Comment has been collapsed.
out of curiosity; you wanted to make a site for gifts (S.Gifts) and one for keys (S.Keys)?
Comment has been collapsed.
SteamTrades is a separate domain. It was in fact the only separate domain that had a menu button link. Everything else (including the discussion forum) linked through the menu buttons is part of the steamgifts.com domain.
Removing a link to a separate, unrelated website while keeping links to other sub-sections of the primary website is perfectly logical. You apparently don't like it, but that doesn't make it flawed logic.
Comment has been collapsed.
That would be really great. I second Dingbat as our new regent!
(Seriously, though, I would love to see some willing people take on running the community over there. I think there are core users enough. I'd hate to see it deteriorate into the place a bunch of people here think it already is.)
Comment has been collapsed.
use it in your plugins or smth.
let btn=document.createElement("div");
btn.className="nav__button-container";
btn.innerHTML=`<div class="nav__button"><a href="https://www.steamtrades.com/">Trades</a></div>`;
document.querySelector(".nav__left-container").insertBefore(btn,document.querySelector(".nav__button-container").nextSibling)
Comment has been collapsed.
Wow thank you! Really kind of you to put so much work into the instructions. I put you on my WL. have a nice day.
Comment has been collapsed.
+1 Thank you for that
Here a quick install button for lazy people like me on OpenUserJS
Link: https://openuserjs.org/scripts/The0Warrior/ST_Button
Source Code: https://openuserjs.org/scripts/The0Warrior/ST_Button/source
(basically the same, just changed the license to MIT and the author to Agrass)
PS: If you want me to remove it let me know
Comment has been collapsed.
Because ST users kept coming here to talk about ST and filling tickets regarding ST scammers.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, I get that and it's good that Barter has its own system for that purpose. Still, if barter goes away it would be nice to have a backup so everyone doesn't have to start from scratch. You can get by fine only using barter's rep system, but more options certainly doesn't hurt.
Comment has been collapsed.
I second this. It's an imperfect system but better than anything else currently available.
Comment has been collapsed.
Why should this draw more people to barter?
Hardly anyone knows the site and it is not advertised either and even if someone goes there because of it...
most people will stop using the site immediately after the first visit.... overloaded and unnecessarily "complicated" to use
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm wondering what is so complicated about barter? I mean it got lots of options, but most people don't need to use them all, they can just trade easily.
Comment has been collapsed.
Therefore the "".... If you only have a few games then it’s okay
but when you really want to use the "features", everything takes an eternity, especially with many games
the quick way just copy your list...then why use it at all, you can do the same on ST as well
Comment has been collapsed.
I like Barter and use it regularly. But it's UI is a nightmare. I'm confident it is off-putting to people, though I have no way of knowing how many are turned away by it. I have a degree in computer science and still, on first signing up it was so arcane that I put off actually listing anything for months. It wasn't that it seemed impossible to use or anything--just prohibitively complex.
And that's not the only reason why Barter.vg isn't a good replacement for SteamTrades. ST is more flexible, and seems to have a culture more conducive to productive trading. Again, I use Barter, but there it seems like many active users drive really hard bargains (IE won't accept trades that don't obviously advantage them) and don't bother to respond to offer they don't like which wastes huge amounts of my time and makes counter-offering less possible. Barter is great for searching out obscure list matches, but if I want to arrange a trade for a desirable item in a with more speed and less bother I start on ST every time.
Comment has been collapsed.
It certainly would, but barter is not a replacement for steamtrades. There is more to trading than trading games for games (i.e. gems, cards, tf2, paypal), and I think barter is inappropriate then.
So if ST disappears, many traders would have to go to a site other than barter for these. If someone knows of a good one, I would be very interested. (there is reddit, which I don't find very good for this, possibly the forum section at lestrades, the bundle leftovers section on the group buy steamgroup, something else ?)
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, I'm with you. I use Barter and Bundle Leftovers as well, but there's no good replacement for ST right now. Even in its state (which is nowhere bad as some in this thread are saying) it's preferable in a number of ways to the alternatives, and provides good utility to many active users. I'd hate to loose the community that exists there.
Comment has been collapsed.
steamtrades is just no man"s land. this pretty much answer any question about steamtrades on steamgifts threads.
Comment has been collapsed.
+1. It's pretty much the only way I get to Steamtrades and makes my SG Bookmarks bar bookmark serve dual purpose. I installed the short plugin discussed above and now I'm good to go. :)
Comment has been collapsed.
It worked for me-- do you have Tampermonkey (or equivalent) installed? What browser are you using?
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm using Tampermonkey on Chrome and just clicked on The0Warrior's first link and clicked Install on the resulting page. I assume you're using the same link, and not Agrass' original screenshots?
Comment has been collapsed.
The button at the top of SG is all that's gone, the site still remains in tact.
Comment has been collapsed.
A kind user has written a simple script that puts it back.
Comment has been collapsed.
Since people are torn about this... I'd suggest adding it as a setting for the site (I know it takes a bit of work but it shouldn't be too bad). Probably start it as hidden to start and then give a warning above it saying they're separate sites etc etc but you can still have a button to link between them.
Comment has been collapsed.
Someone said it was still linked to in guidelines or something like that. If it is somewhere there is already still some small endorsement.
Edit: Looks like it has been removed from the guidelines as well now so you're right it wouldn't really make sense to add it as an option.
Comment has been collapsed.
253 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by Bum8ara5h
144 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by SeaGoblin
46 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by MeguminShiro
2,036 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by MeguminShiro
69 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Kalzar
148 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by adam1224
382 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by mageek
11 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by codasim
30 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by matsalkoshek
638 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by chocochips
148 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by mrakotun
96 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by hyrokey
189 Comments - Last post 42 minutes ago by Shanti
2,426 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Nability
Title
Comment has been collapsed.