You are asking "do you trust AI?". For what purpose do you want to use AI?

If AI is used as tool of research, like "AI explain Einstein's theory of relativity to me", then it is a clear no for me. Hallucinations may lead to bad results for me.

If AI is used to summarize texts, meetings, ... I would use it, have not done so so far.

Generation of images/code/... As one would check the result and modify the input until satisfaction, I would use it.

Several friends have used AI as conversational partner to prepare for job interviews or similar, that is for sure something I would do too.

AI is a hallucination.

It's not about you trust it or not, it is scientific and pragmatic tool to achieve your goals. You literally can control the level of hallucinations, they are needed to differentiate results

Yes, I did know that AI has hallucinations.

In May we had a workshop in the company and our presenter very clearly stated that the AI has hallucinations. Actually, they could remove this effect from the AI. But studies showed that the quality of the results drop when you forbid the AI to hallucinate. Consider it something along the line "Just work and no play will make AI go mad."

AI is just a common abbreviation for "An Indian" (who's behind machine learning).

There are some things generative AI does incredibly well, but there are so many other things it is quite bad at. The most hilarious for me is that it can't do simple math in many cases. You would think that computers would be ideal for that, but generative AI is just guessing.

Trust nothing. Verify everything.

The question should much more broader: do you trust any information from the internet?

new gibs are on top:

• This Means Warp -

• Dust Fleet - -

• Universe For Sale - -

• Breakneck - -

  .

  ---

  .

• Bartlow's Dread Machine -

• Who Pressed Mute on Uncle Marcus? -

• Cosmic Express -

• Post Void -

  .

  ---

  .

• Escape Goat 2 - no CV - level 1+, ends in 2 days

• Universe for Sale

• Baby Shark Sing...

• Snowtopia

Nope... I don't use AI. I ignore anything that feels like AI... But in general well it you want junk it is perfectly capable in generating junk.

I will trust AI when AI can consistently make art with good fingers without fail.

Wait... I C AI 0???
I see AI o0oO0oo000

I've read Aai is being used to detect wildfire smoke in aerial photos, and it's being tested to detect cancer clumps in breast tissue, which often has varied dark patches like static. I trust it to do these things, which will then be checked by humans.

I trust it, partially, to look thru Amazon reviews and tell me how many said the word 'broken' or such. But I don't trust it to tell me drug interactions in summary from search results.

By the nature of how LLMs work, so called hallucinations is a feature not a bug 😂

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_parrot

View attached image.

I'm not opposed to tasteful hallucinations.

AI on the other hand is an issue in the world of real musicians and gaming, and I don't have a favorable opinion of it in general.

In my eyes generative AI is basically just predictive text on steroids, so I trust it as much as I trust any statistical analysis trying to predict something, I take it with a gain of salt the size of a house. It's not that I'm one of those guys that are instinctively against it and only see the negatives, but rather that I see it as just yet another tool trying to be sold by grifters as THE silver bullet that will solve all problems, like someone trying to sell you a teaspoon by arguing that you can use it to dig trenches, technically true but wildly impractical. In reality it is the human intervention what allows any generative AI to output anything useful at all, since it's a human user that has to comb through the data and handpick the good results. So at the end of the day it's just a very sophisticated method for turning pseudo-randomness into something vaguely resembling a thing made by an actual person.
And hallucinations is just a nice way of saying that the algorithm fucked up big time and the output was trash.

Nope. The few times I tried to get a straight answer from one of the chatbots to save time in googling, they came up massively short. Like seriously cannot even do maths properly.
But hey we will die laughing at least ;)

Let's grab some (or a large group of) random intelligent being on the internet and let's ask them something. Would I trust what they say? No, and if you do, you really shouldn't.
I'm not sure why anyone would think this would be any different with an LLM which is based on grabbing what people say with little regards to how trustworthy the content is. Worse, an LLM's reality is entirely based on human language, and humans assign new meanings to words all the time. If I said: "Let him cook.", what do you understand?
Of course, we're still figuring things out in how to construct artificial intelligence and make it do useful tasks. Some endeavours may even have to go back to the drawing boards once they realise that their approach will always have certain issues no matter how much data and processing power they throw at it. There are some very impressive things happening: https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/ai-solves-imo-problems-at-silver-medal-level/ and if you can combine this kind of logical thinking with access to the physical world, the results could become very interesting.
Though if it ever gets to artificial general intelligence with self-awareness, we'll have to deal with lies.

The AI is smart theory: Let's trick humans into correcting dummy information! My number sequence ego is always superior to humans.
(And it is still evolving in real time on many fronts.)

Cover story theory that prevents AI from being superior: military technology is always a few generations ahead of technology used in civilian applications. By introducing human behavior specialized in reading machine data with magnetic data into the organic brain and incarnating an AI that masters and operates from a man-machine interface, we have succeeded in mechanically producing superior personnel. However, while this fact is significant for national defense and wartime, it is not in line with the ethics of the average religious believer, and it causes social unrest, a backlash from low-income people who associate AI with the Terminator and the modern problems of Luddites, so it is kept secret, pretending to be the military or government personnel who give operational instructions, and the cost of training soldiers. This is done to minimize and optimize the cost of training soldiers.

These are all bullshit that I came up with in 20 seconds.🙄Tr...( ｢'Θ')　🥫🧠🧲💻
There shouldn't be any country on earth where these facts are implemented.🤫
I and mankind will give wrong answers more than AI will give wrong answers in the first place. lol

For factual information, absolutely not. All they do is gather information from the Internet, which includes jokes, lies and who knows what else.

I've used ChatGPT for creative things, to think up names, create code, lists or form letters, things like that though. Always needs tweaking but it can be a good start.

I don't use it much, but the other day I was bored and asked it for a list of videogame recommendations. One in particular sounded interesting so I asked for more information about it, only for it to reveal that whoops it actually just made that one up.

We use AI all the time. When people talk about AI right now, it’s just the current igenerative AI.

well, if you don't protect your model from data poisoning you get a lot of bullshit from it

Yeah, I know AIs go crazy quite often. They can be very useful, but not to be used blindly.

The problem is: since much of our society is about cutting costs and improving profit margins, many will already use AI blindly.

I don't trust my own hallucinations.
Why i should trust other ones ?
:-DDDDDD

No.

(Btw, your Wikipedia link needs another closing bracket to link to the correct place.)