I should defend myself against what, your faulty, almost personal, attacks? I'm merely pointing out your ridiculous, out of context claims; "I'm an arrogant, autistic child with a stubborn mindset how this site should be used and who is a good user.".

Quote: "Don't start crying when you start throwing around asinine accusations and people call you out on it." It's almost like you are talking to yourself, don't you think? I don't know what is wrong with you, but you keep ignoring my every message and either you turn them around or simply respond with a flat argument which has nothing to do with the original point.

If the site was meant to be used like I see it, it would mean people took part on forums, never said anything about gifting. Neither did I ever call the op a sad person, not even in a cloaked form.

"Yet you called him sad", what the f? I tell you one more time, stop making these false arguments and separate single words out of context to make me look worse. If anyone understands what you are actually doing, you are making yourself look bad.

My view of this site has nothing to do with your anxious accusations. Either you never read anything I said or you are just generating those lies in your head. I never said anything about rules either or what is a good user, "what a good SG user should be like".

To make this clear, this is what I have been telling all the time, but somehow you've managed to ignore it and turn the conversation upside down. If a user does not comment at least a few comments a week (this is not literal, but directional), takes part in giveaways, he/she is abusing the system. This has been my message the whole time. Yet you haven't been able to pick anything of this claim and ask me, "What do I mean with this?" or "This is not correct, can you help me understand your logic?"

You: "I find it hilarious that you suggest that if everyone had the same mindset as me (that the main purpose of the site is to win free games) there would be no more giveaways."
Me: "If this site was meant to be used as you like to say it, there would be not much longer gifts given."
You don't see the difference between those lines? I clearly said if the site operated like you would like it to, there would be not much longer gifts given. Now I didn't say, "if everyone had the same mindset as you", which is totally faulty argument, again, "there would be no more giveaways". There's a big difference wether people think your way, or the site operates your way.

Also it's very trivial to say you would be here openly gifting, like you have been, wether there was a community behind this site or not. I indeed did check your profile and by the way, I had a little respect towards you before, but with your idiotic behaviour there's not much left of it. I'm still thankful for your contributions. Your profile says next: Comments 2,094. You obviously would be here giving your money away to anonymous, non-responding people and it has nothing to do with the community here.

There is no rule how a user should act like and neither have I ever stated so. I did say if the user would be of any use for the actual idea of the site, if they ever wanted to support the action, they could throw a couple of comments here and there.

I don't understand why do you keep attacking me with such untruthful posts while you are getting more personal each time.

I really hope for your own sake you haven't build up your post around that immoral question.