Come to think, i'm so boring but i'm starting to get bfbc2. Should i buy it?
But if you have a suggestion of Great multiplayer game, leave a comment below.

12 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

because this in Steam

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Borderlands 2

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

^this :3

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

is shit

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I prefer BF3.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+2

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+3

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Bad Company 2 is still awesome (= righteously can't compare the 2 games, because their both special in their own way

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

skyrim

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Who said that? Get Battlefield 2, the last good one in the series (well + special forces addon)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

NO! 1942 was the last good one in series, all others are dog shit. Because!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The community is already receding. I think it's too late to buy BC2.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

there are still about 3000 or more people playing BC2

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I bought BFBC2 for 5$ and BF3 for 10$ and think they are 99% the same. Both games lack maps. You can only play like 2-3 maps and its just not that great of gameplay wiht 64 people. Its a Casual-Game with no competition at all, I prefer SC2 - but it was probably worth the money.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

BFBC2 is better than BF3 because BFBC2 exists.

I'll take a look at BF3 once it is purchasable. And no, Origin does not qualify.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How does Origin matter? You use it only to start game, then you can close it. I guess even Steam has more restrictive DRM. But haters gonna hate.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Battlelog
The worst idea since taking away commander mode

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think Battlelog itself is a good idea, but bad idea is lack of implemented in-game browser (or at least server list...), when map loading times should be definitely shorter.
I like that I can surf the web, while checking Batlelog, stats, etc., install community addons on Battlelog. Well, it's whole point of Battlelog, to be community webpage, where you can post YT and other links.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Battlefield 2 is better then both of them.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

BF3 is better.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes, you're so boring indeed.

I prefer BF3, but... If I had to choose a Battlefield game, I'd take Battlefield Vietnam. That game was so broken, yet so freaking fun.

Great, now I might just install it again!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

well i played bfbc2 and bf 3 for a long time the prime reason for me not liking bf3 is beacuse EAs buisness model that inludes 250 DLCs and make the full game cost really high while bfbc2 has one expansion(vietnam) and only 1 DLC (i think it's spetz kit) so i generaly played more bfbc2 beacuse i had a feel that i had a complete game i know reason is stupid but hey

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

yes its true!!

Bc2 VIETNAM FOREVER!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

both are bad games. no season pass or a lot of dlc's so they are bad.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

BF:BC2 IS GREAT GAME! It had DLC, all of them was free. No premium or other crap that you should buy now to be better than everyone else. DLC Vietnam was one that was priced. And I could say that Vietnam DLC is worth money if you want gameplay without attachements on weapons. BF3 is complete rip off comparing to BC2.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"No premium or other crap that you should buy now to be better than everyone else."

What are you talking about? Premium doesn't give you anything better than normal version, but only items for attention ("look at me, I got premium" - but it's EA's fault...)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you gain xp faster, which gains you levels faster, which gives you better weapons faster, which is pay to win

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can take part in double XP weekend on normal version too... But it just sucks, I even avoid it. Yes, some weapons discovered later are better, but we can still reach them, so it's not pay2win.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, BC2 has a lot of DLCs, indeed =) And BF3 have season pass, it's called (shitty) "premium". I guess you even didn't play them.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i have never played bf3 but i got bfbc2 and that is a lot of fun especially if you have some friends to play it with

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Don't you mean you're so bored? or do you really mean you're boring? lol

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I noticed that too hahaha, I guess english is not his original language.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Playing BF3 made BC2 unplayable for me for some reason.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I would say that BF3 is an improved version of BFBC2. They took almost everything they did right in the first and apply it to the second with some boosts.

Still, I think BFBC2 is a truly worthy game, and as I will wait to get BF3 Premium when its price drops (probably when BF4 is released) I will have a great time playing BFBC2 meanwhile.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

BFBC2 is better than BF3.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yellow is better than red.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

destruction 2.0 > bf3

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think BC2 is more fun, and enjoyable to play. On the otherside, BF3 has more content even without those crap DLC.
and BC2 still have a lot of players, but I would buy it only if it's on sale.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

When Everybody said that BFBC2 is Better than BF3, It Must Be True.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

cuz bfbc2 dont have premuim shit

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

bf3 is easy compared to bfbc2

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hell no! For me it's actually a lot harder. I first played BC2 with good scores, K/D 1+, then I bought BF3. My first mission ended with 1 kill and 13 deaths. Seriously "where the hell are those ppl who shoot me?!". Now I am slowly rebuilding ratio, but it's still harder than BC2. Mostly because on every server there are many pros, who instantly kill you if they only see part of your shoulder behind cover... Not to mention guys, who always steal planes and fly for whole mission and get dozens of kills.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

my k/d ratio remains under .75 after 50 hrs of bfbc2

but in bf3 I already reached 0.71 after 15 hrs .

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I rechecked my stats and indeed in BC2 I got worse. But how you can tell that some game is easier based on K/D ratio... Our case means only that BF3 is more balanced than BC2 and there are less pros, that take most of kills.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i liked bf2142, bf3 was fun, but no that fun.

n no zambies!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 12 years ago by rabbidscool.