What kind of system would you prefer to be used for Charitable Losers?
Hey, the new rules posted on the steam page discussions are coming up with an error for me. Is this on my end, or overall?
Comment has been collapsed.
Hi Delta... sorry but I was unable to find some time for posting yesterday... today I saw you already have some work and ideas going on... I was thinking about suggesting something similar, but perhaps with a lower ratio for preserving membership...
Another idea I had in mind was to use SGtools features to get info about bundled vs. nonbundled ratios or about public/invite/group ratios... this way you can make sure that members always provide a given ratio of bundled and nonbundled values, which to my understanding is your main concern...
About checking valid users you can make a GA using SGTools and enable RealCV checking as a requirement... that way users can post inside the ga and you can check if they passed the SGT check... if they did not and came through a leaked link, you can always report them and help cleanse the site :P
Please let me know what you think about these ideas... I am eager to hear your thoughts :)
Comment has been collapsed.
We;re putting together a tailor-made "checker" for group entry. It includes much of what you mentioned.
Comment has been collapsed.
LOL!
I've actually had a group like that. People would join the group, win a nice game or two, and then leave before giving anything back. Suffice it to say that the lifespan of the group was quite limited.
Comment has been collapsed.
Now you say that about those " runners " I have a question. Two of my CL giveaway winners didn't even bother to say a simple thank you. In your capacity as Admin of the old CL group what's your take on this?
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
I was a tad more lenient than that, I just blacklisted them and blocked them on Steam. ^ ^
Comment has been collapsed.
Anyway, sorry to hear what happened. Hopefully tightening the rules will reduce the less thankful.
Comment has been collapsed.
Sorry to bring this up but it's been nagging on me and I wanted it of my chest since CL version 1.0 is history.
I'm also a sheep (BAA) and saying thank you is one of the major rules there when you win a BAA group giveaway. Saying or posting a simple thank you in the giveaway thread that you won is just basic education 101, it's common sense; it's effortless, it's painless, it doesn't' take more than 30 seconds and you don't have to be a rocket scientist to be able to say/write it.
And I do check my steam invites and SG notifications.
Comment has been collapsed.
I agree with saying something in the smaller giveaways at least, though I try to make it something interesting to read when I get a chance. There is a reason I use the Thanks filter myself. :P
Half the time, I'll either go back to the give after winning to say something, or say it in chat.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
First, I'm not the Admin of the group. That title belongs to Delta. I'm just a Moderator.
Second, that doesn't seem to be the reaction one would expect from CL members. I would probably investigate it to find out what's going on with those two.
Comment has been collapsed.
Sorry, I thought that yourself, Nerka, CJ and Delta were admins of CL.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm intending to be less strict on reinvites anyway. Still, just waiting for a check tool to be finalised.
Comment has been collapsed.
Still keeping the old requirements, but Real Value is what will be used as the base for 'Do they stay in or get kicked?' rather than me flipping a coin when they hit the 2 : 3 - 3: 4 mark on wins to gives. If they don't have the 5.75, 1 : 3 and 50 giveaways, doesn't matter what Real CV ratio they have.
Comment has been collapsed.
Every time I read this it reminds me I have to give out a bunch of stuff I picked up during the last steam sale. Its not much but I do what I can. I also have to get my ratio back to where it was, doesn't help I recently won a bunch of big things... Must resist entering giveaways..... MUST RESIST!!!!... oh god who am I kidding I have no will power... I'm like homer stuck in a building made with donuts, and if he eats too many the building will fall down on him.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
It technically still exists, but I haven't done anything with it for years. Best to consider it dead. Haven't checked anyone for invites or booting in years.
Comment has been collapsed.
Check MadSession's response, above. The group has almost no "activity."
I just checked, and you don't seem to meet the group's requirements. Feel free to try, again, once you meet them. If nothing else, there may be some prestige attached to being in the group.
Comment has been collapsed.
True. I no longer meet the requirements. I stopped creating GAs because I didn't think I would get a response. :) I was too lucky last month. But at least I know it is possible. The sgtools-link was the link I used to verify before.
Thanks for responding.
Comment has been collapsed.
This SG group is currently "Inactive." Despite that, this thread still occasionally gets necro'd by those hoping to join. For those who feel like using the "Join Tool," you can check your stats (or those of someone else) using the following tool:
https://www.sgtools.info/group/DeltaChalos
(Using "Manage Group," you can input someone else's SG name to see their qualifications.)
Comment has been collapsed.
2 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by Lprn
7 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by nguyentandat23496
540 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Ledyba
15 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by SecOps
1,763 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MeguminShiro
47,106 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by kbronct
49 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by blueflame32
3,354 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by pizurk
183 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by AlexForestry
28,237 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by MARxRG
16,773 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by Riszu
682 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Fitz10024
160 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by antidaz
790 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MayoSlice
Update
Some people seem to misunderstand my reason for wanting to limit bundles in some way. I don't hate them. I've done a lot myself. The problem was with wins balance. When the group was first started, not many people could join the group, and there were very few people that could exploit it by having their ratio boosted easily through high bundle or dev key giveaways. 20 months later, we have a lot more people worthy of the group, but also more people that would exploit how the group worked, given it relied on little more than wins to gives ratio. I introduced the anti boosting rule to limit this somewhat, but there were still users that would get in soon enough. Trying to decide on a fair boot point was also difficult .
In the end, since its the second most popular poll option (just behind a suspension, which I'll talk to Khalaq or Bobofatt about later), I'll be adding a Real CV related system for group membership. I still need to go over a larger number of former group members to get a suitable final number, but I expect to be using a Real CV ratio of $1 won : $1.50 gifted minimum for invite, while going below 1 : 1.25 will result in a warning followed by a boot within the week, though a second warning likely won't happen if a user skirts the limit again too quickly.
This will ensure that people aren't messed up by gifting bundles, but those who were potential problems previously won't find it too easy.
Previous invite rules will still apply, possibly with a reduced win : gives number ratio, but otherwise the Real CV ratio will be the only change.
Note for previous members - For reinvites, the requirements will be relaxed. If you fall between 1.5 and 1.25 (or whatever is picked as the final ratio), you can still request an invite to the group.
Hopefully not too many people are annoyed by these changes.
I expect a new recruitment topic to be no longer than 48 hours at the worst, and hopefully less than 24. I'll just be finalising the Real CV numbers and chatting to Knsys to see about a tool that will allow new users to confirm they can get an invite.
Original post
I've been trying to work out suitable new rules that take the changes to SteamGifts since v1 into account. I'm quite terrible at it. I want to balance things well, but I can't really find a good point which allows the group to be fair to all users.
Right now, higher numbers of bundle giveaways can allow members to win more without a boot. I'm trying to work out a good ratio for when a user should get the boot, but as it is right now, a set amount would punish people who have given less giveaways at higher prices. I've just been booting when I feel like they have enough, but that isn't really suitable, and means I can't make others do it either.
I've been trying to work out something that keeps the classic rules that were made when we couldn't even see wins CV and bundle gifters were capped at $30. I'm getting the idea now that just isn't going to work out as well as I'd like. We have long time users that wouldn't pass some of my ideas. We have me unable to pass the current idea (like I said, I'm terrible at this).
Since I can't just tell all the brats to get off my lawn and force CG to change this site back to the way it once was, I'm going to collect input from all users that frequent this site. Should I continue the group with similar rules to how it was started, get working on a system that uses Real CV Sent and Received (and if so, what ratio do you think should be used for this), should I try another system to be mentioned here?
Should I retire from leadership and make Khalaq and Nerka do all the work?
Comment has been collapsed.