Hmmm, challenge accepted! (I suck at explaining things :P)
In Z/4Z there are only 4 elements {0,1,2,3}. (Is "elements" the proper english term?)
0^2=0
1^2=1
2^2=4=0 (mod 4)
3^2=9=1 (mod 4).
So a^2+b^2 has to be either 0+0=0 or 0+1=1 or 1+1=2, it can't be 3. Thus, if n=a^2+b^2 it can't be =3 (mod 4).
Is this making any sense? XD
Comment has been collapsed.
Definition: The symbol Z means "The integers"
Definition: not sure if this helps but you are dealing with mod 4. the operator "mod" means you take the remainder of what it is after you divide. So 3^2 mod 4 = 9 mod 4 = 1, because 9/4 = 2 remainder of 1.
The nature of this problem deals with integers and mod 4. When the problem says "if n (operator) 3", this means that what you should assume is "suppose n mod 4 = 3".
So that's what you do. You suppose the "if" part.
Suppose n is an integer, and n mod 4 = 3.
You know that n can only be one of the following: 0, 1, 2, and 3. This is because when you take any integer and divide it by 4, the only possible remainders can be 0, 1, 2, or 3.
Then you suppose, for contradiction, that n = a^2 + b^2, where a and b are integers.
[Essentially through this contradiction you are going to prove that the sum of two squares when divided by 4 will never have a remainder of 3]
Well let's consider the squares in Z/4Z. As I said the only possible numbers you can have are 0, 1, 2, and 3.
0^2 mod 4 = 0. Okay. Next one
1^2 mod 4= 1. Cool.
2^2 mod 4 = 4 mod 4 = 0. therefore 2^2 = 0.
3^2 mod 4 = 9 mod 4 = 1. therefore 3^2 = 1.
So you have just proven that the only possible digits that can exist as a square in Z/4Z are 0 and 1. Therefore the binary sum of 0 and 1 can never result in 3. In fact, the highest possible value you can get is 1 + 1 = 2. It can never be 3.
Comment has been collapsed.
Wow Magma Claw, I didn't think you'd get any replies here on SG but it seems there are some smarties here after all! :D
Now we won't have to post all over reddit for you.
Congratulatory bump!
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm going to sleep now, so I guess I'll be missing out on those free keys :P
good luck with what you're working on! :D sadly I can't be of much help :(
Comment has been collapsed.
that's not the question.
the proof says: if n is in the form of 4m+3 than it is not the sum of two squars.
Comment has been collapsed.
yeah that proof is not hard to understand.
but not sure about the complex part in the other questions. sorry :(
Comment has been collapsed.
Show that 6-1 is a Gaussian prime using the formula given in question 2.
Show that if m+ni divides ordinary number k, then m-ni divides k as well.
What is 6-1? What formula was given in question 2? What are m,n,i?
Comment has been collapsed.
Uhm, I'm half asleep and not sure what definitions you were given and what you already know, so I'll just drop some ideas:
My english sucks, my brain is asleep and I'm too lazy and tired to google most of those things, so take all of this with the notion I might be talking complete nonsense (happens to me quite often XD). I shouldn't be doing your math homework anyway :P
Comment has been collapsed.
262 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by stertyr
163 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Wolveruno
19 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by KjaerBeto
16,703 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by wigglenose
126 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Superefg
48 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by wigglenose
1,215 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Carenard
185 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by 86maylin
377 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by Ottah
69 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Habaruku
6 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by ayuinaba
12 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by NewbieSA
220 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hbarkas
45 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Karfein
Part 1
I found a small proof on the internet that is relavent to what I am working on at the moment but I am having a hard time understanding it. I would be very grateful if someone could take the time to elaborate on it and maybe explain it a bit more in depth.
P.S.. might drop some random CD keys here sometime today so keep an eye out ;P
SOLVED--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 2
Show that 6-i is a Gaussian prime using the formula Norm(ab)=norm(a)norm(b).
Show that if m+ni divides ordinary number k, then m-ni divides k as well.
Deduce from question 2 that any ordinary prime which is not of the form n2+m2 is a Gaussian prime.
Show that a positive ordinary integer of the form 4k+3 is not of the form m2+n2, and hence that ordinary primes of the form 4k+3 are Gaussian primes.
Got this last bunch to solve and will drop some keys within the next hour or so
[Edit] need to check which of the cd keys are not activated so might take some time
Comment has been collapsed.