You can go with 0, nothing wrong with it.
You can also use whitelist to add some people for multi group giveaways for example (meaning people that aren't already in the groups).
Comment has been collapsed.
If you don't intend to create any whitelist giveaways, than there's no reason you should whitelist anyone. There's nothing wrong about having an empty whitelist.
[EDIT] Also I don't think it's possible to find a difference between people who haven't whitelisted anyone and people who haven't created any whitelist giveaways.
Comment has been collapsed.
Whitelisting is a popularity contest to some people, or you can simply whitelist people who you consider helpful in the community.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's why you only whitelist people who help you out in some way. If you use any of the scripts available, consider whitelisting the creator of it. Mod helps you out frequently with tickets, whitelist them, etc.
Comment has been collapsed.
You can white (and black) list anyone you want.
I use my whitelist for people I want to say thanks to (either for doing stuff for the community, beeing nice/helpful or giving way more than the take, etc.).
But I mostly do no whitelist only GAs. Instead I just include them, when I am making a GA for a group (as long as group rules allow it).
Oh, and if you care about CV and have some game you want to give to a group but are not sure you will reach 5 entries, you can include whitelist and add people if neccessary.
Comment has been collapsed.
People appreciate getting whitelisted, since it gives them feedback that the community likes their "work" (or giveaways) here.
It also gives you the best control who gets a chance to win your games and a decent chance that some people whitelist in return when you are giving away something interesting.
Personally I use the WL to invite people to the giveaways for my primary (invite only) group.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nobody's forcing you to do anything of the sort. I think it's better to be conservative with whitelist usage anyway, since I've seen a lot of people whitelist for very silly reasons. Then again, I'm also very against people using the blacklist (at all), so as long as you hold back with the latter, I think you're one of the nicer people in my book :)
Comment has been collapsed.
I reserve my blacklist exclusively for cases of harassment.
For example, I had a few people chew me out for not sending the game they won the moment the giveaway ended. Aside from that being incredibly rude and against the rules, my thought is that giveaway creators are being generous with giving away games, and thus should be met with respect and appreciation in return. If you harass the giveaway creator and treat them like a deadbeat dad that owes you money, then you don't deserve to benefit from their generosity.
Comment has been collapsed.
You don't have to use whitelists or blacklists. It's just a way for people to know you appreciate them or what they are doing on the site. It gives them an advantage if you ever do decide to do whitelist giveaways. You could add people you like to a whitelist and do whitelist giveaways later, or never add anyone. Doesn't make you any less of a member :P
Comment has been collapsed.
I whiltelist people when I find out that they whitelisted me and/or when I win someone's giveaway. I rarely do WL giveaways since I'm kinda worried wether they will get 5 entries lol I mean I WL'd over 100 people but the games I give are literally bundled trashes
Comment has been collapsed.
If someone who had whitelisted you runs a whitelist giveaway it will show under the group's link as a giveaway with a blue heart
Comment has been collapsed.
That need to get 5 entries to get credit on a group giveaway is a place where whitelisting comes in handy: if your bundletrash group giveaway comes up short but you thought to add your whitelist when creating the giveaway, you can visit the "perpetual I-need-5 thread" to find one or more people wanting to win your giveaway, and then whitelist them so they can join your giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.
because it wasn't a direct answer to some of your posts
Comment has been collapsed.
It's fine to have an empty whitelist. Nothing wrong with it. I always feel a bit weird when people say "whitelisted", I kinda feel like they expect that I return the favor, which I rarely do without lengthy interaction first. However, I sometimes tell people when I whitelist them and usually say why, which I hope feels less like I expect a whitelist in return.
Personally, I have a system where I tally points. If someone is nice or helpful (or really funny) they get +0.1 to (theoretically) +5.0 points, and when they reach 5.0 they're whitelisted. Blacklists work the same way, but negative behavior (rudeness, bigotry, cheating, etc.) warrants negative points. There is one member I can think of that went from a positive score to negative, and is now back to positive again. There's one member who I've decided to keep at -4.99, just shy of a blacklist, but my heart is warming to him, so maybe I'll restart him at 0 and see where it takes him. There's also the recent case where someone went from 0 to +4.99 just for knowing MTNN. So there is a kinda fluidity in the system.
I've started to keep track of why I whitelist or blacklist people, as well as blacklisting date, so I can go back and check if they've redeemed themselves.
Comment has been collapsed.
yes , just treat yourself honestly , we can use anything to make WL/BL , no matter use feeling or progressive system.
If your soul tell you don't creating , just follow it.
We have unlimited freedom , oh , in addition to harm others.
Nothing is true. Everything is permitted.
Comment has been collapsed.
Maybe yes, maybe not.
I think most of us know why anything happened and how it work.
So , just let your heart tell you.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you don't ever plan on doing WL giveaways, then there's no reason at all for you to white-list people.
How you use your whitelist/blacklist (if at all) is entirely up to you - there's no right or wrong way to use them - and don't let anyone tell you differently (and some will try).
Comment has been collapsed.
This is how I choose to use the whitlist system.
I do sporatic group and non group giveaways.
My white-lists is simply a "Thank You" to anyone I place on it for whatever nice thing(s) I've noticed they have done in the SG or Steam communities.
Those people are automatically added to most group and all public giveaway I create.
That simply gives them the opprotunity to get another free game.
I use the blacklist much the same way, but based on my judgment of whatever sh*tnanigans I've picked up on from them.
Comment has been collapsed.
if you want to do that, then just do that
Honestly, why so many they must do something or require someone to clarify why they BL or WL............. it call personal choice, you can BL everybody, or WL no one, that your choice, no one have the right to question about it
Comment has been collapsed.
And that's what selective means. o.O
Selective: relating to or involving the selection of the most suitable or best qualified.
So, it's about choosing people you want to include and excluding people that don't fit the requirements you have set.
Others may only whitelist their friends, others only level 10 users, others only people from Dominican Republic, others only white people, others only people that have never won anything, others only users with a username that starts with L, and the list goes on and on.
Comment has been collapsed.
I mean, they won't know you whitelisted them so you don't have to worry about this "like for like" thing.
Everyone has their own reasons for whitelist/blacklist, I simply whitelist people who seem nice on forum, usually people I interacted with at some point. I don't do WL giveaways right now but if I decide to create some in the future I'll have sure I WANT these people to win it.
So if you wanna go with 0 it's completely fine, your whitelist, your rules.
Comment has been collapsed.
I make my WL as the list of people from which i won something and sometimes i want to give something back, so i make WL giveaway.
Almost like a group when you try maintina good ratio, you win something and you give something back.
But nothing bad on 0 WL i suppose. ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
If you have nobody on your whitelist, you are a pretty terrible person. Don't you know anyone you like more than most people? How about all those nice people who whitelisted you? What's wrong with you?
If you have nobody on your blacklist, though, you're a monster. The world is full of people who don't deserve a chance at your gifts, and you're just allowing them to potentially win stuff. Have you no shame?
And yes, obviously I'm kidding. I should know.
Comment has been collapsed.
The beauty of the SG lists is that nobody can question your motives for flinging people on them, so go right ahead.
Actually, I recommend against doing that right now. My cakeday is coming up soon and you'd be missing out on some pretty sweet GAs.
Comment has been collapsed.
150 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by Kurajberovic
59 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by CHUCKYXS666
499 Comments - Last post 52 minutes ago by RobbyRatpoison
17 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by Inkyyy
32 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by InSpec
196 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Nimmy
1,057 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by sensualshakti
127 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by ShannonA81
10 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Uroboros
17,054 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by pkin
23 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by DanielStoSve
9 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by Raggart
489 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by DrakeTheduck
6,447 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by xeos23
I'm not sure I get the purpose of whitelisting, unless someones prefers creating whitelist-only GAs. I don't intend to do those kinds of GAs, so I feel whitelisting would be the equivalent of "like me to like you back" and I avoid SNS like the plague.
Is it an untold requirement of SG or something, or can I go on with 0 whitelists and still consider myself a nice person?
Comment has been collapsed.