[GoGoBundle] Go Go Bundle Limited #25

Would that line not go both ways, however?
Regardless, next time you may want to point out precisely what elements are troubling, so that Shakti can know what she can change if she feels a compulsion to do such. It's also worth noting that for all that her enthusiasm and tone can at times come across as rudely emphatic when she's providing information to others, the flip side of that is that I haven't seen her respond with anything but positivity and agreeability to constructive input directed at her own deal thread information. In other words, it really does just seem to be a thorough display of enthusiasm (combined, perhaps, with the kind of phrasing mistakes that we all make at times), rather than anything intended to be rude. As such, we should be able to work on the matter civilly and respectfully, rather than running off yet another bundle thread caretaker with unnecessary stress.

Also, a bit of a curiosity to consider- while each of your comments was directed toward Shakti directly, each of hers was primarily focused on the thread formatting itself. She truly does just give the indication of being that devoted to her sense of propriety, rather than ever intending any negativity herself. Given my own tendency to fixate on things, I can't help but appreciate just how misunderstood her perspectives may in fact be.

Finally, consider this: If she didn't provide the information, someone else likely would have criticized the OP for misleading info, and perhaps more rudely. Meanwhile, the OP provided just enough information that she couldn't warrant a thread remake, without drawing criticism from that. While her phrasing may have needed additional consideration (which she appears to have given it rather quickly after posting, making her initial arrangement little different from a typo), her approach was nevertheless one of the least dramatic ways of getting the information out, regardless of how it turned out. Put another way, if she got criticism from this approach, she'd have likely gotten worse criticism from any other approach- with the possible exception being if she'd said nothing at all (but given that by this point she no doubt feels responsibility for such topics, it'd be unreasonable for us to ask her to switch off her focus on it so casually).

Perhaps my impressions are mistaken, but perhaps that in itself indicates there is reason enough for us to withhold calling her out in the future unless she has actually done something at that moment which warrants the calling out. Right now, all such responses do is muddle up things for no good cause.

edit:
On a side-note:
Cromulent means something which is likely (grammatically) illegitimate, but presents itself in a way that seems as though it could be legitimate. It's used primarily for extensions of grammar which don't have commonplace usage, as a way of indicating that regardless of what common grammar rules suggest is appropriate phrasing for the matter, the deviation of phrasing makes a logical sense (based on broader grammar considerations). As such, using 'mooses', 'sheeps', or 'animes' as the plural of 'moose', 'sheep', or 'anime' (all of which normally serve as their own plural form) would be an example of cromulent word usage.