Indeed, and from what it seems, it doesn't really matter.
Comment has been collapsed.
You get points like shit as it is, it would be a disaster to increase the rate even more.
Comment has been collapsed.
174 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by wigglenose
59 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by Chris76de
286 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by hbouma
642 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Oppenh4imer
864 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Ashtart
255 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by XfinityX
30 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by TinTG
170 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by PicoMan
31 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by PapaSmok
507 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by cyan3675
529 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by CommissarCiaphasCain
17 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by chilidog
65 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by reigifts
28,923 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Narashi
I'm wondering if one's point accumulation could be dynamically based on points spent vs # of times won. If someone has one then they accumulate 5% of the points entered but if I've been entering for 2 months and haven't won anything then my point accumulation rate would raise maybe to 20% or so? This would help level off winners and keep people interested. As someone spends more points then their accumulation rate slowly rises back up. It keeps people from hoarding points and helps everyone win something at some point.
Comment has been collapsed.