So every now and then I have nothing to spend my points on, and haven't won a game a in a long while.
so, why not let players pay double points for double entry?

2 years ago

Comment has been collapsed.

No one entry is enough

View Results
The more the merrier
2 entries sounds good

Maybe there should be option to get points for not entering giveaway too? /s

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What's the point of the poll if there is no way to express disagreement?

Anyways, I think that only users that have given more than they have won should be able to join giveaways. /s

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

1 vac ban
1 game ban
his ratio
this thread
enough said.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

haiku?
gesundheit!

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 year ago.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There is being burnt for being in the center of the sun, and then there is this BURN!

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How come peeps who have next to none involvement with the site always have the most radical ideas? Their detached POV is allowing them to see the big picture :)

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you look at their profile picture, you see their big balls that was required to make this topic

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

View attached image.
2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, you know what they say about people with big balls...

small brains

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

lmao

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Where's the "No, this is a bad idea. One entry for everyone is good." poll option?

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Potato

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think there should be a feature that if your username is omrital99 you get unlimited entries.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, it's like the Konami code.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I vote for 1/(unlimited) entries.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can actually enter a giveaway multiple times.
But each click adds only 1/unlimited entries.

Or you can enter infinite times, but the first click adds only half an entry, and each one afterwards gives half of the previous one.

(suggested change)

2 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you want to win more, create some good giveaways and join some nice gorups.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you want to win more, create some good giveaways...

I wish that was how it worked.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

{ font-family: "light hearted joke"; }
Good idea, but keeping up with the theme of "2", this option would only be available for those who have given away at least twice as much as they've won.

Edit: all jokes aside, a double-entry option would be nice in theory (I, for one, would benefit from it), but I'm not sure how it well it would work in practice. It may introduce its own problems, like an unfair advantage in some groups and whitelists where entries can be in the single digits.

2 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 year ago.

2 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, I would like that.

I don't think ratio mentions in comments doesn't make sense in this topic, because same thing can be said for single entry as well. Someone who doesn't give anything can enter a giveaway and that's ok, but when he uses x2 points for x2 change, it is not? I think it's either both or none.

About why I would like that; I only enter games that I would play (as you can see from my profile, every SG won is played thoroughly) and I still filter a ton because of my backlog (which is nothing compared to %90 of SG users, currently 22 games). So, would it be unfair if I have more than one chance for a giveaway I want to enter (since I pay with points anyway)?

Even this could be good imo, make it double,triple... point for more entries. So for a 60 dollar game, 60, 120,180...

2 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I wouldn't say not winning anything for a just over a month is a long time, however, not giving anything for over eight years I would consider a long time. xD

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The twisted irony lol

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

All entries have equal chance to win. This suggestion would go against that. It has been suggested before and not implemented.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I vote for the poll's title. :D

But, yes, myself, I dislike the idea of "multiple entries", where you end up competing with yourself. Indiegala has these "Extra Odds" GAs, and I never enter them (though those are worse, since you can buy as many tickets as you want).

Cheers!

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There are multiple websites that do multiple entries raffles and it's just such a pain to enter them all, and if you don't you don't have the same chances of winning as others.

So no, one entry = one person is fair and not complicated.

You can enter multiple GA's of the same game, so why bother with a system that would in the end give less chances to enter more GA's or give an unfair disadvantage.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Only if everyone entering gets two entries.

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

don't feed the troll

Edit: on the other hand i think you should be able to invade the wining user and take their key (seems fair) /sarcasm

2 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.