Oh My.

you...do realize they were joking? I'd think the !!!11one thing gave it away even if your reading comprehension was off enough not to pick up on sarcasm any of the other more subtle ways(the "/s" at the end of the statement, the deliberate misspelling, the statement of "that is sarcasm" ect)

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I laughed.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Alteria

Oh my :c

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Grizzlywolf

damn! :/

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Another reason for the USA to ban guns...

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Banning guns would do nothing, they are already in the hands of millions and they will not give them up. Criminals would only profit off of a ban on guns.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Support that claim with facts.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Newsflash criminals don't obtain guns legally.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Support that claim with facts. You are just making loosely based assumptions.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This!

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

for one example felons aren't allowed to buy (or be in a house with I think) guns, so for example any felon who commits a 2nd crime with a gun didn't get his legally....unless the government didn't put the paperwork through or forgot to confiscate his already owned weapons, or the seller started a gun show(loophole) in the trunk of his car and didn't check or something

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Piss off, where is yours exactly? Support that claim with facts.Support that claim with facts.Support that claim with facts.Support that claim with facts.You've yet to make any counter argument.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The burden of proof relies on you. I did not make any claim.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

For counter arguments there should be arguments to counter against, not baseless assumptions.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Then why do you baselessly assume banning guns would work? Where are your facts sir?

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Newsflash they do obtain guns legally because guns are legal and the USA and easly to obtain.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Where are your facts?

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

heh, how did I know your steam would say you aren't from or living in the us? Why do other countries think we get them in our breakfast cereal as a prize or something?

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Support the other claim with facts too.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I did not make any claim but I'm curious about that argument as I've seen it used several times but sounds quite fallacious to me, so I was expecting actual evidence that supported his claim. In my eyes is just an assumption made by some, at least until I do see factual proof of that. I mean I was not doing that to provoke everyone, but I'm actually curious.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I was referring to dooder39's claim that this is "[a]nother reason for the USA to ban guns[.]" You're certainly not making any claims other than that those who are against gun control should back up their arguments with evidence, which is a valid argument.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Oh, sorry I misunderstood you.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No one is willing to give then up because they are still legal. Ban them and give a BIG fine to people who refuse to hand over the guns. Then suddenly no one wants to keep them because they don't want to risk a fine.

Problem solved?

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hahahaha

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Jonex

You're very naive.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Reo

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

sigh what ever... but don't come cry here when you decide the go on holiday in the USA and get shot..

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Jonex

*extremely naive.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Eduelmago

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+11 made extra funny for me personally because I actually had a taxi driver in Canada say almost the same words and also imply that I was currently armed in an non joking way(or maybe just really really deadpan(I assumed deadpan and gave him an extra yellow quarter(errr....$2 coin that vending machines and parking meters treat like a quarter)).

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Naturally. Nothing violent happens in countries with a ban on guns. People never even get shot in those countries! ಠ_ಠ

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

kangarooster

Boston shit? Another reason for USA to ban cooking pots? GG sir.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Implying there are monthly terrorist attacks with cooking pots.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

kangarooster

Not terrorist attacks necessarily, think of the domestic violence and percentage of dead husbands due to cooking pots used as blunt weapons!

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Same with guns. You can hit some one head with a gun as melee weapon...

Conclusion:
Ban 'em both!

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

^Thinks banning things will solve a deep-rooted problem of mass violence.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Support that claim with facts.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Where are your facts? Or will you just keep repeating that banning things is effective? Oh wait we have 2 million in jail and not in recovery programs because drugs are banned. You should know Dutchman you have strict guns laws and you still have mass shootings.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Lol... There is WAAAAAAYYYYYYYY less shootings here then in the USA... Yet I haven't seen any facts that support your baseless assumptions...

Also you don't even know which drugs are addictive and which not, FYI weed isn't addictive.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Lol... There is WAAAAAAYYYYYYYY less population is The Netherlands (16,696,000) than the US (311,591,917) I wonder why there would be more mass shootings? Also I know marijuana isn't addictive, that point only proves my point more that banning things carelessly lead to millions going to jail/being fined for something that should be legal.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rampage_killers
Don't mind to respond, I already used the ignore button on you(not that you would say anything usefull anyway)..

Edit: doesn't what you said confirm that tgere is way less crime in the Nethetlands, because we have a lower population? Also don't mind to answer this question, for the same reason stated above.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hahahaha

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Such a ridiculous response. Do you even realize you're trolling?

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

KaiserTroll

Then ban violence ?

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Pretty sure violence is illegal that ban doesn't work either ho hum

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

twistedmetalero

you know in my country is also just as easy to obtain guns, yet the only civilian shootings that happen are by hired hitmans, and we are talking about one of the most violent countries in the world.

11 years ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.