Counter-example
"Not Recommended
1.5 hrs on record
Definately one of the best games that comes out this entire friggin decade. 10/10, but there's one thing that I'd like to point out. The title is indeed, very, very, misleading. You can't watch dogs at all. So if you're an animal lover, this isn't the game for you. Tons of violence, and no animals."
Comment has been collapsed.
1,865 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by ngoclong19
1,021 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by sensualshakti
1 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by sensualshakti
108 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by xxxka
16,335 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by Peiperissimus
156 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by MrTommy
338 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Elgbert
45 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by eeev
81 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by limathompson
703 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Wintermute101
28,280 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by EobardThawne
8,032 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by greddo
756 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by APocketfulofStars
308 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by Peiperissimus
Hey all,
Just wondering if you guys new why people keep giving "Recommended" reviews on steam, then proceed to trash the game in the review? I was looking up Watchdogs reviews (it's already out in parts of Asia), and almost every review said that the game was a sucky, broken piece of bleep, but then gave a thumbs up. Why?
An example:
Recommended
1 hrs last two weeks / 1 hrs on record
Got it installed and so far every time ive tried to play it my comp crashes :(
Comment has been collapsed.