Counter-example
"Not Recommended
1.5 hrs on record
Definately one of the best games that comes out this entire friggin decade. 10/10, but there's one thing that I'd like to point out. The title is indeed, very, very, misleading. You can't watch dogs at all. So if you're an animal lover, this isn't the game for you. Tons of violence, and no animals."
Comment has been collapsed.
2,652 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by drbeckett
298 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by tungmapu
16 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by TheRegalMachine
2 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by m0r1arty
18 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by EvilAaron
159 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by MeguminShiro
11 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Dunther
136 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by yugimax
1,715 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Vasharal
37 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by GeekDoesStuff
37 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Codric
667 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Mayanaise
408 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Griske14
26 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by NeptuneZero
Hey all,
Just wondering if you guys new why people keep giving "Recommended" reviews on steam, then proceed to trash the game in the review? I was looking up Watchdogs reviews (it's already out in parts of Asia), and almost every review said that the game was a sucky, broken piece of bleep, but then gave a thumbs up. Why?
An example:
Recommended
1 hrs last two weeks / 1 hrs on record
Got it installed and so far every time ive tried to play it my comp crashes :(
Comment has been collapsed.