Looks like the 560Ti might be a good bit more expensive than the 650
Comment has been collapsed.
650 Ti comes with Assassin's Creed 3 for free. You could sell that for $40 probably to offset the difference in cost between that card and the non-Ti version you are considering.
$120 for 650 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125445
$160 for 650Ti http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125447
Comment has been collapsed.
Ti is for people who want performance in their games for the extra price. Going from 560 to 660 is enough for Metro 2033 and SS3 on 1920 X 1200 at high fps. Extra CPU will not matter at this point and the graphics card is always bottlenecking the computer these days.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'd say go for a 660 ti, I mean for a bit more you get a card that will last you over 3 years.
Here's one on sale, but with X-mas around the corner you'll find cheaper. . . The Msi 2 gig Pe is the beast on the market. . . but they all use the same core up to the 690, just the shaders are halved (or something)
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, except he specifically said "Also don't recommend me other video cards" so suggesting a card 50% more expensive than the one he is asking about seems to be missing what he is asking about.
Comment has been collapsed.
In the first link you've accidentally chosen 560Ti vs 650Ti while I think you meant 560Ti vs 660Ti since you wrote that in your comment.
Comment has been collapsed.
It would still be worse even if all GPU's used exactly the same architecture, all games used exactly the same coding and all graphics cards somehow were able to run without drivers. Even then it wouldn't take the variable resolutions into consideration. Then again I don't really care what you think. It's obvious I won't learn anything from continueing the discussion so let's agree to disagree.
@ OP: Get the 560 out of the two.
Comment has been collapsed.
I agree with you, but if op can I'd say get the 660. . or 560 ti. 560 and 560 ti are still way overpriced seeing as 40 bucks more gets you a 600 series. Mind you a 560 doesn't have the hardware a 570 does, but a 560 has the same set as a 570. and the 50 series is just throwing your money away.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think it was OCZ that tried selling barebones laptops that you could add whatever components you wanted to, but it failed miserably :(
Comment has been collapsed.
286 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hbouma
173 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hbouma
642 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Oppenh4imer
58 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by RobbyRatpoison
864 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Ashtart
255 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by XfinityX
30 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by TinTG
506 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by MayoSlice
65 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by reigifts
16 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by adam1224
28 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by Cole420
28,923 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by Narashi
52 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by Greativity
433 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by OneManArmyStar
So I'm thinking in upgrading my old nVidia 9500GT with an nVidia GeForce GTX650.
Specs:
Name: Gigabyte nVidia GeForce GTX650, 2GB, GDDR5, DVI, PCI-E
Max Resolution: 2560 x 1600
CPU Frecuency: 1058 MHz, 28 nanometer
RAM Frecuency: 5000 MHz
RAM: 2048 MB
Bit: 128bit
Tehnologies: NVIDIA PhysX, nVIDIA CUDA, nVIDIA 3D Vision
OpenGL: 4.2 version
What do you say? Also I saw a nVidia GTX560, 1GB, GDDR5 with 256bit, what do you say?
Also don't recommend me other video cards, I want only Gigabyte nVidia.
Comment has been collapsed.