"Fair use" for Blacklist

Personally, I see nothing wrong with the system the way it is. The creator of the GAs should have some discretion in who is eligible to participate. That includes the option of eliminating people for their own reasons. Yes, that does mean that they can do it for crappy reasons such as their own biases. However, it also gives the person the freedom to identify users that do a disservice to this community. It can serve as their means of showing dissatisfaction with certain behaviors.

I guess I do not see a need or reason to create a mutually exclusive blacklisting system either. If a person limits my access to their GAs that does not necessarily mean that I have reason to do the same. Of course I say all this from my own point of view... and this is coming from a person that has but one person on their blacklist. That user made it there for blatant and excessive (again, IMO) derogatory statements in forum threads here and on their Steam profile. I may not approve of "leechers," but rather than blacklist them it is easier for me to show appreciation for contributors by setting level requirements for my GAs.

For me Blacklist is somenthing like reverse Steam group,instead inviting people i can exclude them.

"So i understand this right? someone can people blacklist and they cant join his giveaways anymore BUT the guy who blacklist people can join everyone? How you guyz even think this is fair?"

Its just like if i make giveway for steam group, only people in group can enter others cant ,but i still can enter giveaways made by people not in steam group.