Please, Vote also for my new game on greenlight if you like it:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=707814059
53 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by radagast82
102 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by lycankai
1,135 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by sfkng
79 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by MeguminShiro
16,630 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Kenruyoh
891 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by nhahtdh
32 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Ekaros
76 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Begum
8 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by coleypollockfilet
120 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by schmoan
111 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by Mortvie
4 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by zzzwlagga
93 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Vasharal
9,852 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by simrafael
Saw the greenlight page. I'd understand if the footage quality was hardware-limited(solution: implement a replay system and record footage outside real-time after playing a game), but blaming it on network quality gives a massive code smell.
300Kb/s is A LOT of bandwidth for games. sending 128 bit packets(more than enough information to encode a player's input) 64 times a second to 32 players only takes 256 Kib/s. A client would only need to send 8 KiB/s to the server in that scenario as well. Bandwidth(even with ADSL) shouldn't be a bottleneck.
You should take a look at Minecraft's server protocol for an example of how to implement a proper network protocol.
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks!!
Comment has been collapsed.
ᴛʜᴀɴᴋs ғᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʜᴀɴᴄᴇ :*
Comment has been collapsed.
i won, waiting the key, thx :D
Comment has been collapsed.