Please, Vote also for my new game on greenlight if you like it:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=707814059
1 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by reigifts
10 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by stlpaul
62 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by OsManiaC
20 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by pauper
23 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by damianea103
16,935 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Fluffster
2,696 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by MeguminShiro
19 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by AliSama
49 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by hatoku
225 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by DrTenma
53 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Mdk25
962 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by Mdk25
67 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Azaltir
23 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by FruitCober
Saw the greenlight page. I'd understand if the footage quality was hardware-limited(solution: implement a replay system and record footage outside real-time after playing a game), but blaming it on network quality gives a massive code smell.
300Kb/s is A LOT of bandwidth for games. sending 128 bit packets(more than enough information to encode a player's input) 64 times a second to 32 players only takes 256 Kib/s. A client would only need to send 8 KiB/s to the server in that scenario as well. Bandwidth(even with ADSL) shouldn't be a bottleneck.
You should take a look at Minecraft's server protocol for an example of how to implement a proper network protocol.
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks!!
Comment has been collapsed.
ᴛʜᴀɴᴋs ғᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʜᴀɴᴄᴇ :*
Comment has been collapsed.
i won, waiting the key, thx :D
Comment has been collapsed.