Nice deconstruction of the game there, but it doesn't address the plot points Jonex is asking about.
For that, I'd suggest reading the two articles where a marine candidly gives his thoughts about the game as he plays.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
16,276 Comments - Last post 18 seconds ago by Yamaraus
16 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by pawelt
323 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by Mitsukuni
36 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by brivid0boy
42 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Gamy7
379 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by missiloon
447 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Hawkingmeister
701 Comments - Last post 1 second ago by stlpaul
49 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Thedarksid3r
1,569 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Carenard
46 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by quijote3000
838 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by Noobdynone
123 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by achilles335
748 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by satanclauss
I've managed to understand most of the story, but there are a few questions below that I haven't managed to answer.
The 33rd were good or bad? At one point I see them herding civilians together like cattle. Next, I see civilians worshiping General Konrad.
Why did the CIA support the insurgents against the 33rd?
Why did the insurgents even exist?
The radioman (the most chilled out guy in the whole game), was commanding the 33rd the entire time???
If Walker and his Delta Force buddies were able to walk through the sand wall, why didn't they just evacuate Dubai all those months ago?
I understand that the game was left open to interpretation, but even any thoughts/ideas are appreciated.
Comment has been collapsed.