What do you think?
Me, three. Just look at what they've done to The Defenders. P
Comment has been collapsed.
The first two films were directed by Andrew Adamson and the third film was directed by Michael Apted. The fourth film was to be directed by Joe Johnston, but it was announced in 2018 that a new adaptation would be made for Netflix.
That's from the Wikipedia page for the film series, looks like Netflix are carrying on where the films left off.
Comment has been collapsed.
it's not the make up which is a problem, but the priority shift
She isn't interested in Narnia or Aslan anymore
Comment has been collapsed.
yes, but it literally being his version of rapture and only the "blessed" being taken this is to show turning your back on religion/aslan is a sin worthy enough to be damned for at lest thats what i read into it. the one sinning being female may not be 100% on purpose outside he felt one of them needed to be the "sinner". i point out the makeup because she is only refered to in a few lines and this was talked about and i wandered if it was to demonize females making themselves pretty for the enjoyment of men (jezebels).
Comment has been collapsed.
this was the view of the church for a long time. lewis seemed open minded and why the faith stuff took me by surprise. i'ed like to feel the sin was just turning away from god/aslan and a way to leave it open to write another book maybe about redemption. do to the way the church demonizes women i fell this leaked in to his text. i mean how would you show someone should be dammed with a few lines of text that church goers would understand.
Comment has been collapsed.
It was always the intent of C.S. Lewis to make Narnia a (symbolic) re-telling of Christian theology. The Matrix Trilogy was similarly based upon Christian beliefs.
Comment has been collapsed.
Same as the new "avatar" licence....
Comment has been collapsed.
Lets see how they turn a generally Christianity-based theme into some kind of SJW spin. That should be fun.
Comment has been collapsed.
So, you would get rid of Jesus to keep it anti-SJW? ...
Comment has been collapsed.
That's a strange what-if scenario. I don't see the point of it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Jesus was an SJW. That's why they killed him in the end.
Comment has been collapsed.
I see it is always 4:20 where you are. Go easy on the cookies or you'll get diabetes.
Comment has been collapsed.
Lol. You're the one who immediately sees evil SJWs in a product that has barely been announced. Your terminology already shows your way of thinking.
Just remember you're probably only alive and well off because so-called SJWs fought for equality and more rights for the general populace over centuries.
Comment has been collapsed.
Social activists fought for equality and rights. SJWs have not and do not, so no. But that's a common argument from SJWs since they like to think they're more than just whiners and communists.
Comment has been collapsed.
I very much hope this doesn't devolve into petty bickering, but that seems to be the direction things are headed.
Comment has been collapsed.
What makes me say that is the way the discussion has gone from expressing opinions to hurling insults.
Comment has been collapsed.
Isn't it always the case nowadays when words like snowflakes and idiotic acronyms, and religion, are being flung about online?
Seems people can't disagree while respecting other opinions, whether they find them valid or not.
Anyway that was my point. I wasn't being dismissive of the topic, just the form
Comment has been collapsed.
Anyway that was my point. I wasn't being dismissive of the topic, just the form
Looking back at your original statement, I am guessing that you were being sarcastic where I was taking you literally. In any case, I agree completely with your sentiment. People are bound to disagree, and have been doing precisely that throughout human history. Recently, however, the younger generations have not been taught how to disagree in a civil manner. Not only have people become intolerant of the opinions of others, belittlement has replaced argumentation. Instead of discussing ideas, it has become commonplace to dismiss and/or assault any differing points of view. In this way, those who lack the capacity to think and present their thoughts to others for consideration are given permission to shout down all opposition.
As the wise man said, "Never argue with a fool; he brings you down to his level, then overcomes you with experience."
Comment has been collapsed.
I was being sarcastic, yes. Sarcasm doesn't translate really well in written form. I should gave used a ;) or something
Not only have people become intolerant of the opinions of others, belittlement has replaced argumentation.
Yes, and the fact there are a bunch of people counting on that polarization to make a buck or stay in power doesn't help keep debate civil.
As the wise man said, "Never argue with a fool; he brings you down to his level, then overcomes you with experience."
It gets harder and harder to enter any public conversation (particularly online) without running into quite a few of those on both sides of the argument unfortunatey.
Comment has been collapsed.
"Why is artistic license always labeled SJW? " - It's not. It only gets labeled when it actually is SJW, which is noted by a sharp increase in leftist ideologies and a sharper decrease in content quality.
Comment has been collapsed.
You don't know ANYTHING about this Narnia project and yet you couldn't resist to start ranting about SJW already. Seems pretty safe to assume that you aren't the kind of person who manages to wait for a final product and then judge its quality unrelated to some messages you might dislike.
Comment has been collapsed.
Seems pretty safe to assume that you're the kind of person who couldn't resist getting mad and blacklisted someone related to some opinions you might have disliked. Judging people based on them having valid concerns about the quality of products shows that you don't really know ANYTHING yourself dood.
Comment has been collapsed.
Coming from someone that thinks "far-right", "alt-right", and other meaningless terms from the weird corners of someone's butthole are valid statements that invalidate anyone they're directed at.
Goodbye, stirrer.
Comment has been collapsed.
Enough.
And in case anyone thinks it's safe to follow his example because "he did it, first," my hammer is still at the ready.
Comment has been collapsed.
having a jesus like character in stories is normal but in these books aslan IS literally jesus. it didn't bother me until the last few books and by then i already read most of them so i just suffered through. what bothers me is the blind faith crap as you are expected to ignore science and facts because of "faith" and this is a running thing in most heavy religious stories not just christian ones.
Comment has been collapsed.
oh look at you trying to turn my last joke post against me. haha but no! the last books are exactly what i would have expected from a christian story and why i would not have read them because i would have seen it coming. i will say i did enjoy them until the last 2 books and the 2nd to last wasn't a total wash since it explains the creation of narnia.
i also have no issue reading/watching things i don't agree with so i can be informed when i rip them apart.
Comment has been collapsed.
the one to bunny? yes
though i don't get your post since i didn't expect anything as i didn't know about the author till after i read the books and it wasn't cause it was "different" it was the blind faith crap religious authors tend to put in their stories. if i had know when i read them i would have spotted these earlier as every book has them but it was like one off things.
Comment has been collapsed.
They don't seem to be going broke. Not that DC could go broke anyway but even that comic book seems to be doing pretty well
DC VERTIGO BORDER TOWN IS GOING BACK TO PRESS
Vertigo’s 'Border Town' Back to Press Because It’s Sell-Out Good
I'm not trolling, really. Just curious to know if there is actually examples of businesses losing money because of whatever "being woke" means.
Comment has been collapsed.
Businesses are about making money. You can bet that if they do it, they're making money off it. Obviously most entertainment businesses these days make more money from exposure and publicity than from actual sales (Hollywood would have been out of business 10 years ago if they were counting on their diminishing box office numbers to pay the rent) so I doubt they are going broke. Or even pushing an agenda. They're mercenary.
Now are they "going woke" out of the goodness of their hearts? Most likely not. They're doing it because it makes them money and because it reaches new audiences.
That's why I was curious about the concept. I don't think they're genuinely concerned about diversity, just about appearing concerned but that's because it makes them rich, not broke.
And I do see your point about comics sales. Unfortunately it's a dying medium, despite all their best efforts to make it "current" with movies. There aren't many that sell in the 30K these days. I don't know how Border Town will do but it's just starting and it's doing better than they expected if they are already re-printing. So it's not a failed experiment yet.
Comment has been collapsed.
Man, every peaceful discussion has to end like that with you...
I'm not being dense, you were saying businesses that "go woke, go broke", I was asking for any example and you did not give me any.
I was just saying that even if you don't like it, businesses are businesses. Money-making is their only concern. Some choose to play liberal, some to play conservative but in the end it's all about money.
Comment has been collapsed.
Don't be so offended by criticism and brushing off other people like a smart ass. You asked about bad business ideas and I gave you one. Look up Diversity and Comics or Yellowflash comics channels on Youtube and see dozens of videos of comics getting roasted for being so bad, selling even worse, and getting discontinued after a couple issues.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm not offended by criticism, I'm annoyed at myself for trying to have an honest conversation with you again and getting the personal attack dismissal.
You asked about bad business ideas and I gave you one
No, I asked for examples of companies going broke for "going woke". There are plenty of bad business ideas byhealthy businesses which make billions that have nothing to do with politics. Ask Google for glasses.
I still haven't found a business getting in financial trouble for what you call "going woke".
Comic books are canceled every day and they don't necessarily involve politics, or make anyone broke. But the specific example you gave me has just started and seem to be doing well. And I'm not being dense, just disagreeing with you on businesses reasons and the outcome of their fake political moves.
Comment has been collapsed.
Businesses are about making money. You can bet that if they do it, they're making money off it.
Not necessarily. Look at CNN as an example. The only thing keeping them "on the air" is the fact that the people backing them can afford to prop them up while absorbing the loss. (That, and the monopoly they enjoy in foreign markets.)
Comment has been collapsed.
Except it's usually not other "takes" it's just adding a bit of "color"/diversity by switching out characters. Sometimes, like with Domino, it works quite well, other times like with FF4, Harry Potter and Spiderman, it's pretty annoying and cringe-worthy to anyone familiar with and or a fan of the base material.
You may be speaking about a different thing if you really think the intent is to further an artistic goal.
I really don't care about this one, but don't really want them "taking liberties" and making characters where their background matters and changing it to make it fit the token minority that they wanted to cast. It's just a TV show after all...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Comment has been collapsed.
I have not heard anyone complain about the idea of a black stormtrooper. On the other hand, I have heard plenty of people observe that Disney has obviously gone out of its way to spotlight women and minorities in Star Wars.
It's not about one character (and personally I think Finn, the "black stormtrooper" is the best of the new lot), but the overall lot. If it wasn't bad enough that they have been stumbling over themselves to signal their inclusivity, they also feel that they need to denigrate white men in order to elevate women and minorities.
Consider that the two most iconic white men in the Star Wars universe, Luke and Han, are shamed and humiliated throughout the new movies. They are revealed to have made countless mistakes (especially Luke) and have basically reverted to their pre-New Hope stage. All of the growing up they did? Gone. All of their heroic legacy? Meaningless.
Meanwhile, Luke, who was the greatest Jedi of all time, is upstaged by an overpowered Mary Sue character in Rey who seemingly is amazing at everything, has no need for training, and has no apparent weaknesses. Not only does this nobody outshine a Luke Skywalker, but she goes on to handily defeat and humiliate a trained swordsman and force users (Kylo Ren) the very first time she turned on a light saber.
Kylo Ren, of course, is one of the small crop of white male characters who seem to be included merely to be humiliated. As noted, despite having extensive force training and light saber training and experience as a fighter, and having the Skywalker bloodline, he is beaten easily by an untrained newbie in her first fight. He also is shown to be a needy, emotionally unstable crybaby throughout the movies. We also have Admiral Hux who was mocked extensively by Poe at the start of The Last Jedi as if he were not a legitimate villain.
Also, despite having a black stormtrooper, he is the only minority we actually see amongst the New Order ranks. The film makers, despite their push for diversity, left any other visible members of the First Order as white, making it hard to not see the stories as "evil white group (mainly men) versus diverse hodge podge of women and minorities."
The only white male of any note amongst the resistance is Poe Dameron. When he is introduced, his notable character trait is that he is one of, if not the best, fighter pilot in the galaxy supposedly. And yet, this seems to be nothing more than a setup so that when Rey comes along and upstages him, despite having little or no experience (again), it makes her seem even more amazing. Likewise, he spends most of the second new movie frustrated and humiliated (like the audience) as he is repeatedly denied some kind of dialogue with Vice Admiral Holdo. How dare he want to know about the plan or make suggestions?!
Oh and Leia is not just a force user now (despite again, no known training), but she can fly and breathe in the vacuum of space.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you are on my BL, it was prior to this discussion. I never blacklist people because of discussions ever.
And I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about all the people seemingly triggered by the recent Star Wars movies. I have no opinion on them beyond their general mediocrity. Rey is a boring character. She'd be just as boring if she was a dude. Somehow I doubt most people who hate her would care how bland she is if she was a dude, but honestly the general political polarization everywhere bores me even more.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't remember ever running into you on the board but I am not a mod. I don't BL people because of "site rules violation". Looking at your profile, I can't really tell but I'm guessing it was lack of activity. If it means that much to you, you're off my BL but honestly I don't make AAA GAs so you were not missing much :P
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you.
Honestly I don't care about missing giveaways (though I do prefer indies over AAA), just bothers me when people feel the need to try to lash out and "punish" others for thinking differently than them (which, as you say, you did not do, just speaking generally here).
Comment has been collapsed.
No problem. I honestly have no idea how you ended up on my BL in the first place.
And yeah I agree, not just about SG, it's one of the most civil places I have seen online in recent years, but generally speaking. I can't resist a good debate, never could; the exchange of ideas and arguments is something I find fascinating. Unfortunately it's a rare thing these days, about anything, which is a shame.
Thanks for the adult conversation and for expressing your views without acronyms or insults
Comment has been collapsed.
They replaced Mary Jane with MJ, going from redhead to black. Not a big change, but I liked the original character and it just sticks out as a change just for the sake of ideology; and, based on the statistics, it appears that African Americans are actually over-represented, while other minorities like asians and latinos are under-represented, at least as far as the US population is concerned.
The black version of Fury is from the comics, it's the ultimate universe version.
I have other issues with StarWars other than race representation, though I do find it funny that the space Nazis would be "inclusive". That said, that thing does fit the cannon, while most things with Rey do not. And the last movie just fucked everything up beyond recognition, I have to agree with Mark Hamill that Rian didn't understand Luke (and so write for him) and overall just made whatever he wanted to subvert expectations whether it made any sense or not. Basically, the newer movies didn't understand what was the outlook/soul of the original movies, they went bleak and took the time to systematically destroy both the original characters and the happy endings they had earned...
Honestly, I just want them to respect the artistic integrity of the material they are adapting, I would love to see more unique stuff, just not pointless changes. There is a lot of material that would allow them to have diverse characters without changing the base material, they just need to adapt more varied sources.
Example Stormlight Archive:
Comment has been collapsed.
You do realize that the books were made into a movie series, still often seen on cable tv at times. You do know that, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chronicles_of_Narnia_(film_series)
I suspect they did not do as well as expected or they may have been made and released closer together, and the rest of the series may have gotten their movies made.
Not sure what Netflix thinks it will do differently, to make it better, other than better CGI, I suppose?
Comment has been collapsed.
You do know that, right?
You do realise they weren't even the first screen adaptations. You do know that right?
Comment has been collapsed.
there have been a few over the years most where prety bad looking.
as for netflix the movies studios may have the rights to those books they did do for x more years so redoing them is off the table or pay a butt load of money. i will say the books kinda went down hill as it went on. though i feel they should get mel gibson to do the last book do to his work the passion of christ.
Comment has been collapsed.
Your Facebook link isn't going where you expect it too.
Comment has been collapsed.
Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra and That Hideous Strength targeted adult readers just as the Narnia series was for children. Lewis employed the pulp, scifi fantasy tradition to tell a 'weird tale' that actually framed a pretty serious philosophical debate on the nature of good and evil and the impact of science (read technology) as it replaces religious thought in the modern world. Some of it is a bit dated, and some of it is chillingly prophetic. On second thought, Netflix, though they have put out some high quality shows (and many mediocre ones), is probably not the best choice for a project like this - they are better off keeping it simple with the Narnia series. I do recommend the books though, as well as Til We Have Faces - another good read.
Comment has been collapsed.
I really disliked the Space Trilogy. Out of the Silent Planet was fine, but the next two books became way too preachy. They seemed to abandon all pretense of allegory and devolve into a literal battle between good and evil, God and Satan. Going into them expecting science fiction, I was very disappointed with what they turned out to be.
Comment has been collapsed.
Out of the Silent Planet was my favorite of the three, but I was forewarned and so understood that I was in for ideas that would be nothing like the kind of ideas one could expect from science fiction of that era. My take is that the religious allegory is sustained in the second book, but by the third (a very different sort of read than the first two btw), I agree, allegory is completely absent, as intended, because in this case Lewis was attempting to apply the ideas he had developed in strange and fantastical fashion elsewhere in the solar system to the mundane reality of everyday life on earth.
Comment has been collapsed.
To me, it seemed that where the Christian themes were relatively subtle in Out of the Silent Planet and his other books, they were obvious and overt in the second book, and he was bashing you in the head with them in the third book. I was not forewarned, just expecting some science fiction, so the content of the second and (especially) third book caught me by surprise. The third book in particular was way too much for my tastes. For me, religion is like sugar - a little bit is fine, a lot is unappealing. :) I didn't pick up on the philosophical aspects that you did, of Lewis attempting to apply fantastical ideas to the reality of everyday life. It's possible that the religious themes, particularly the third book's overt battle between God and the Devil, overshadowed the other themes for me.
Have you read Ursula K Le Guin's sci-fi books? I loved The Left Hand of Darkness, and thought The Dispossessed was really good too.
Comment has been collapsed.
Many would agree with you regarding the third book and even some devoted Lewis fans have claimed that it should never have been written. Though it's been a very long time since I read any of them, the first two left an indelible impression, while I have to admit that I barely remember That Hideous Strength. It simply lacked the freshness of a new, stripped down perspective of spirituality and belief, unencumbered by the rigidity and hypocrisy of formal religion, that I discovered in the first two books.
I've read many of Le Guin's books, and never one that I didn't like or even love. What can I say? Very few writers have had the impact on science fiction that she had. Those two novels in particular were hugely influential to the direction that science fiction would take and for me personally. The only other writer from around that time period that made that kind of an impression was Doris Lessing and her Canopus in Argos series.
Comment has been collapsed.
Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra and That Hideous Strength...
Excellent books, although the subtleties within them are often overlooked due to the intensity of some of the imagery.
Personally, I'd rather see some of Robert Aspirin's work translated into film.
Comment has been collapsed.
They did such a good job with Deathnote, how could this possibly go wrong?
Comment has been collapsed.
meh... Mob Psycho 100 was passable as live action, but I'm hard-pressed to think of any others that turned out well.
Comment has been collapsed.
Spectral wasn't made by netflix. That's why it wasn't bad. It was a full budget 70 million dollar Universal studio movie intended for theatrical release until things went bad and netflix just stepped in and said "we'll buy the distribution rights".
"Originally produced by Universal Pictures for a theatrical release, who decided to offload it instead. It was subsequently acquired by Netflix"
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm looking forward to reminisce about Narnia but I also understand your worry about Netflix making a bad adaptation. Netflix is pumping out a lot of original works and adaptations so quality is very hit and miss.
Comment has been collapsed.
Cautiously optimistic. Fan of the series, but Netflix originals are hit/miss at the best of times. I really hope it ends up good but I'm not getting my hopes up.
Comment has been collapsed.
Not that I care about Narnia, but it's Netflix, not neflix ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
5 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by Sh4dowKill
1,763 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
47,106 Comments - Last post 52 minutes ago by kbronct
14 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by FullMetalZ
49 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by blueflame32
4 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ZPE
9 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Arvennios
790 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by MayoSlice
70 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by cg
21 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by Kyog
159 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by zzzwlagga
9 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by reallurker
175 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by samwise84
10 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Fluffster
Today in a Facebook post on The Chronicles Of Narnia's official page, i saw this post:
I am happy and unhappy in the same time, i really love the books/movies/games of Narnia, I am happy that i will see it's world again after all these years, but afraid that Netflix would ruin the legacy.
Comment has been collapsed.