If we could get one solution, which would be more useful?
Importing/Exporting of Hidden games list could enable a community driven master list which catches such games.
This will also ensure new users(& old) can sail smoothly without dealing with the headache of facing these games again and again.
Comment has been collapsed.
As I already suggested previously - we can have a community filter list: all the games that was filtered sorted by amount of times each one was filtered. From there people can look up for most filtered titles and add them to own filter list.
Comment has been collapsed.
Community-wise it's just rude. Just because I don't like someone else's giveaways doesn't mean I don't want them to join mine. Unless it's a bot account, huge leecher or open cheater etc. I wouldn't want anyone to not be able to join a random giveaway.
I usually hide giveaways anyway but sometimes they're too much at once, that's when I go blacklist way. If there was a way to hide an individual's giveaways, that would make this simpler in my opinion. Also if I want winner to play games, I'd just go for such groups e.g Playing Appreciated, Playing Matters so that's not a problem.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well that's true :). From my point of view, there are some deserve a blacklist here but the ones I block because of their giveaways doesn't feel right. At least I wouldn't waste my BL slot for them if I can even though my list is very small.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think there aren't any curators on the main page for some time, unless it's a publisher/dev from a game you played. I basically ignore their existence too and don't bothered by them. The idea of it nice but probably 99,9% of them are useless and there are really useful ones how Valve intended. It's kinda like Steam points, since they introduced them the community pages filled with useless guides and reviews.
Comment has been collapsed.
being able to blacklist by Publisher/Dev is the best option imo(other than maybe importing of hidden games so a masterlist of trash can be given to anyone to hide)
upside of blacklisting publisher/dev those asset flip dev accounts will never show up for us again.
Comment has been collapsed.
To whom is it pomy??
What are the criteria?
If we read and use some external DB, are we not unknowingly complicit in censorship? (Does it include unrelated games?)
I would like to know if such points can be easily resolved.🤔
https://www.steamgifts.com/account/settings/giveaways/filters
It may be less time-consuming to figure out how to batch feed them into a filter for hiding.
Hmm...
https://www.steamgifts.com/discussions/addons-tools/search?q=filter
https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/c1xhr/userscript-improved-game-filter
Perhaps a one-click hide is currently available as an option.
(I do not use these).
I think there used to be a better one, but it seems to be gone.
Comment has been collapsed.
"To whom is it pomy?? What are the criteria?"
Those are fair questions. My solutions do not trip over those questions. The 'community filter list' does, but mine don't.
When each user can individually say 'enough of this publisher' or 'that user is welcome to enter my GAs but I don't need to see theirs', I don't see that as any kind of censorship when one user's choices only affect themselves.
Comment has been collapsed.
If that is the intention, it is easy to understand.
It would also be nice if there was an add-on that would do that, but I can't seem to find anything powerful enough to do that right now.🙄
Well, maybe someone or his or her add-on developer will look at these conversations and come up with a better way, and there is no harm in thinking about it and posting the story.
Comment has been collapsed.
[Userscript] NSFW games filter
https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/u0wRz/userscript-nsfw-games-filter
🙄Rumor "shows up". 👻Interesting, isn't it?
It is also a gratifying story that there are people who are willing to take on the challenge of this type of development.
https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/Qw59KtY
XD Oh, you already knew that.
Comment has been collapsed.
I use Barter.vg also, so wishlisting a game to make it easier to find GAs for here might mean getting trade offers for it there, and often my hope-to-win interest isn't as high as the current trading value. So I do find myself combing the main page and clicking titles that aren't in my wishlist view.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, I just ignored them 1 by 1 and when 1 shows up again I ignore right away, see no issue in that, but can understand that at first it's a time consuming matter.
What I find an issue for it, is that on Steam you can set it that it doesn't show 18+ content, here you can't do that which basically means the 18+ pictures are shoved in your face and can understand not everyone being very happy with that.
Comment has been collapsed.
i want a filter that will hide the cheap shitty vn/puzzle asset flip porn game. and show me the cool ones like bonetone and larry and bad ass babes
blocking dev/publisher, id be down for that.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'd appreciate SG adding:
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, Steam clearly marks what it believes to be "Adult-only games", and you can setup your Steam account so you never see them in the Store. That setting should be somehow inherited by SG, I think (or at least we should have a similar setting here).
Not that I am prudish or offended myself, but, yeah, IMHO, people should have that option.
Comment has been collapsed.
You seem to imply that we can rely on Steam's labelling of 'those' games as "Adult-only" or "Sexual Content" and I have to disagree respectfully. I have not found that to be reliable, although maybe it's gotten better since the last time I checked.
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh, no, I 100% agree with you that Steam's labeling is not really reliable (hence "what it believes to be")... But I would argue no labeling will ever be very reliable (since different people have different takes on what is acceptable and what is not). Since there is a "standard" done by Steam, I think it should be used. I mean, if Steam gets it wrong, you will end up seeing porn in their store page anyway, so at least it is not SG's fault that you were exposed to that content.
So my take on the subject is: Steam's classification in a broad sense, which can be filtered by some simple toggle; then each user can finetune it using his/her personal "hidden game list" (which is already in place).
Comment has been collapsed.
Filter by Publisher seems like it would be clearly-useful for a wide range of things, since there's many publishers that release a bunch of small, inexpensive, similar games and if you're not interested in one of them it's very likely you're not interested in any of them.
Though, while this would be harder, an even better option would be to filter games by Steam tags. The problem is that this would surely be more work to implement - while that information is certainly available from the API, I suspect that Steamgifts would have to cache it, which wouldn't be worth it for this alone. That said, it'd be useful information for Steamgifts to have to work with for a variety of reasons, so it might be something to consider if development ever moves in that direction.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm not so sure on that point regarding Steam tags. I use Playnite, which gets my library info through API, and it doesn't show me Steam's tag info. Genre, publisher and developer, yes, but not the tags.
Do you know some software or a website that definitely does get Steam tag info via API?
I'm glad filtering by publisher is resonating with some folks. It's a shame that Potato is garnering more interest than Greylist.
Comment has been collapsed.
Steam Library Filters depends entirely on being able to filter by tags to be useful. I don't know how it gets them, though, just that it shows that there's at least some way to do it.
Comment has been collapsed.
I've made userscript for myself to hide giveaways of nsfw games.
Seeing this discussion I uploaded this userscript to GitHub. So those who uses SG on PC and wants to hide nsfw giveaways can try it: https://github.com/Xeloses/sg-nsfw-filter
Upd: updated script and posted in discussions → user projects
Comment has been collapsed.
i keep on thinking about this and really should be the right time for cg to think about a filter for Adult Only content hosted at SG.
meanwhile, i've thought a simple solution, but needs collaboration from our entire community: we create a Steam Group, say SGAO, AdultSG... everybody can join, and everybody should/could/has to share Adult Only content in that Group.
no need of ESGST, no furious clicking for users that, rightfully, asks to hide that content.
as this Adult Group would be known only here in Discussions, we, the users, will try to spot Adult Only GA's that are public and invite the creator to join the Adult Group.
Comment has been collapsed.
To quote someone I have a loving respect for...
"You seem to imply that we can rely on Steam's labelling of 'those' games as 'Adult-only' or 'Sexual Content' and I have to disagree respectfully. I have not found that to be reliable, although maybe it's gotten better since the last time I checked."
Comment has been collapsed.
17 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by adam1224
448 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by Marius11
62 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by pb1
887 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
530 Comments - Last post 50 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
47,105 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Pish4
39 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by shivam13
101 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by xandyvan
38 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by fernandopa
121 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by CBlade
1,196 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CBlade
145 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by rimvydasm
65 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by cg
90 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by cicangkeling
As a way to give users the option to avoid "porny" games, without unnecessarily blacklisting other users who may dispose of such games here, I suggest two solutions:
I know individual titles can be hidden, but there are sooo many porny titles that blocking them individually is like an endless game of whack-a-mole.
Does anyone think either of these ideas would be useful in cases other than porny titles?
Comment has been collapsed.