Not censored, but law abiding. And if a kid goes to 4chan or whatever I think it's their parents' fault, not the provider of the content.
Comment has been collapsed.
There are many ways. First of all actually caring about the child then having a look to what he does and getting to know his interests and what can be harmful for him. Then if you don't want to do that there are many services by ISP and programs to block certain sites.
I never liked forbiding things and lessening individuals freedom in order to make us stay safe
Comment has been collapsed.
So they should get into it. I've always thought that a parent should have some sort of interest in his children activities. But it's quite easy to buy your kid an XBOX and let him play whatever game he asks for no matter which contents it has. Or letting him surf the internet without acually caring about he's doing.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, that could be a problem certainly. But I don't really think that forbiding things is the solution to that.
Comment has been collapsed.
Thats not an excuse at all. If the parent cared at all, they have the means to easily find out about tools and services as well as general knowledge about how things work. If a parent cant be bothered to learn how to protect their child or more likely, enforce their own ideology, then do they really care?
Comment has been collapsed.
God forbid a parent spends some time to teach their kids. Instead they just want block everything that's bad in the world so the kid can just run around willy nilly and the parent doesn't have to worry. Sorry folks, parenting doesn't work that way
Comment has been collapsed.
this is why I have a password on my router and can black list sites at will.
I'm also a one of those parents who says my house my rules and have key loggers installed on MY computers and smartphones that I LET them use.
While I can't stop them all the time, I can know what they are doing when they think I'm not looking and I can talk about it with them.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well this seems a bit to strict IMHO. It's a good way to keep their monitored but I do think that everyone should have a tiny bit of privacy. And, what is more, if I had realised that I was being kept track of using a similar system to yours I would have felt deeply dissapointed towards my parents. I think that through trustiness and communication we could achieve better results. It is true too that that is REALLY difficult to achieve.
Comment has been collapsed.
*privacy ;)
My father had a similar setup, except that my phone was my own. I knew the workarounds, since he didn't know about router-level blocking. At the end of the day it's your parents stuff and if you're doing anything illegal (piracy) they are liable.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well I'm watching Minnesota-Chicago through an arabic stream because there's no other way of currently viewing it. So I guess I'm pirating things :-(
Comment has been collapsed.
I knew, but I feel shocked as I was actually pirating :^P
Comment has been collapsed.
Not very often, and not in any major ways. I respected my parents. Now that I'm older, we're friends. I like my parents. They never blacklisted any websites, or censored my life in any way, but explained to me why I should not do things in a reasoned manner and treated me like a thinking person who could make decisions my entire life. And in return, I thought, and made rational decisions. Everyone screws up, but that's another part of growing up. And I'm proud to say I've screwed up a lot less than most people.
I think it's incredibly lazy for parents to demand for the world to change to suit their children, rather than teach their children to experience the world.
Comment has been collapsed.
So you have. If you don't censor or take preventative measures to stop your kids from doing something, then you'll likely be playing damage control most of the time.
If an 8 yr old stumbles across a porn site then what? How would you make sure they didn't go on there before without explaining what porn is, or without them knowing what it is?
Surely you don't think it horrible for a parent to want to wait until a kid is a bit older before explaining that type of stuff?
Comment has been collapsed.
It may sound strict but its a mix of both approaches. My children are all under 13. If you believe that I will hand them internet accessible devices and not have the ability to rein them in I believe its irresponsible on my part. The porn example is perfect. Too often they hide their content on other less offensive sites and blaw!, 12 yr old is watching 2girls1cup.
I recently had to stop one of my kids from accessing youtube on his own. There is plenty of content that is age appropriate but without constant supervision things can go south quickly. (Which I caught it and why they don't have unrestricted access.)
As for the right to privacy, its a good lesson. Don't put crap out on the internet you don't want someone else to see.
Comment has been collapsed.
Of course I have, that's a stupid question. Everyone has, it's a part of life. It sounds like you're trying to imply that if we censor everything then our kids wont disobey us. It's actually the reverse, because if you just censor everything and don't explain anything to your kids, they won't know whats going on and ignorantly make even more poor decisions.
You don't have to explain what porn is, you just say that some parts of the internet are dangerous and not intended for kids. There's an intelligent way to do these things. If your kids respect you, and trust you, they will listen. And if you don't, then you talk to them THEN, and explain what just happened. I'm just saying that you should TALK to your KIDS, and not force the rest of society to bend to your particular whims. Seems like that's a foreign concept to a lot of parents, however.
Comment has been collapsed.
Bah, Tor, proxies, VPNs, governments will never be able to successfully do that
Comment has been collapsed.
Service providers can only inconvience us, not actually block us. My earlier used example of pirate bay, is still accessible to me, despite the ISP block, but I have to go through a proxy. The other method of me evading this, would be to change my DNS settings, and use something such as Google DNS, but the problem there is that I have no wish in messing around with that stuff.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think that the UK government is far less concerned with stuff like 4chan, and far more concerned with stuff such as piracy. I literally can't get on the pirate bay through my ISP anymore, without using a proxy, and the proxy is rather unreliable, despite thepiratebay having some legitimate content.
Comment has been collapsed.
I suspect they're equally, if not even more, excited about building up detailed profiles of their citizens, particularly under the convenient guise of fighting a war against "terror", whatever that is supposed to equate to...
Big brother is in ur computer, harvesting ur informatiunz, as the memesters might put it.
Comment has been collapsed.
They might work but are the results worth the sacrifice? Just asking as I'm not really into that, I have little information about it.
Comment has been collapsed.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."
The UK has suffered significant erosion of freedom and privacy in recent years. Maybe it's a necessary evil in terms of preventing deaths and property damage, but in some ways the fanatical religious zealots (I don't like the word "terrorists" - it's too loaded) have won, by successfully biting a chunk out of some of the core tenets of British society which they stand against.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well in my opinion ____ . And further more __ _ ___ in _____ . damn their on to me
Comment has been collapsed.
No, that is just stupid.
You know ,you can block certain contents with the options of your browser....
Comment has been collapsed.
There is a difference between a optional one and a mandatory one, that seems to be the one you talk about in the OP.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think its the difference of Censoring the Internet versus Censoring YOUR computers access to the Internet.
Censoring your computers access is optional. Censoring the Internet itself removes any option.
Comment has been collapsed.
There is already software available for concerned parents who want to limit their kids' access to the internet.
I suppose if you're going to legally age restrict films, magazines, etc, you could also construct a convincing case for limiting access to games and websites containing similar material. There isn't really any logical difference. Either you should be "protecting" kids against such material (whatever the format) or you shouldn't.
Where do you strike the balance between allowing parents bring up their offspring as they see best, and attempting to protect kids from parents who simply aren't fit to be looking after children though? Total Freedom (rarely as good as it sounds) vs the Nanny State?
Comment has been collapsed.
The problem is most people aren't aware of it, kids being more tech savvy would know how to bypass it.
As for your last paragraph, too deep for this topic I think. Go a little further and you could ask whether everybody should be allowed equal rights to have children.
Comment has been collapsed.
Indeed. "Human rights", once you scratch the surface, are all somewhat subjective and deeply problematic. To grant a particular "right" to one person, and treat it as inalienable, may fundamentally infringe on the "rights" of another person.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't disagree, but it's very difficult to establish a set of inalienable human rights which are independent of behaviour, and the impact of that individual exercising those rights has upon others, and that is the same when applied to any culture or community which seeks to uphold such a premise.
Comment has been collapsed.
Not at all if kids get on games that are rated M i dont give a shit they have the rating and i swear and im not going to stop just cuz a little kid gets on it was his choice.
Comment has been collapsed.
1,248 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by logorkill
158 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by DeliberateTaco
395 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by wigglenose
39 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Foxhack
284 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Wok
8 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by TheLimeyDragon
82 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by GarlicToast
118 Comments - Last post 14 seconds ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
9 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
800 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by DrTenma
656 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by PastelLicuado
169 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by Mikurden
31 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by slaveofwant
4 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by adam1224
Do you think internet should be censored at all for kids to prevent access to sites like 4chan, or whatever else has disgusting stuff on it?
EDIT: Also what do you think will happen after the UK is done with monitoring the internet after 2 years?
Comment has been collapsed.