Camera?
A few questions:
Comment has been collapsed.
Do you have any reason to limit yourself to only to Nikon and Canon?
Plenty of reason. These two are market standard, so more accessories available more easily. I don't know what goes on in people's minds who buy other brands, but I know I wouldn't.
Comment has been collapsed.
As Yirg said, it's a huge consideration. Mirrorless is arguably the future over DSLRs and Nikon/Canon both suck at mirrorless right now.
Dominating the market means little, just ask AOL.
Comment has been collapsed.
When it comes to serious large-sensor cameras without a flipping mirror - meaning non-DSLRs, not necessarily mirrorless - I would say that (depending on needs), different models from Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, Samsung, Fuji and Ricoh - don't suck.
Comment has been collapsed.
Pretty much everything, trips and the like but mostly nature and animals
Budget is 1200-1300$
He does understand the difference between mirrorless and dslr cams and is sure he prefers the latter
By display your pictures you mean sharing them with others? If so he plans on making albums and sharing them on social media
Also, the poll is just to get a general idea of where most people stand :)
Comment has been collapsed.
This budget isn't sufficient for a camera body of the two mentioned in the poll and suitable lenses, which at the very least need to be a wide-to-short-telephoto kit lens (e.g. 18-55, suitable for everyday photography, trips, street photography, landscape), and a long telephoto kit lens (e.g. 75-300, suitable for shooting nature and animals).
His main options are to increase the budget or get a lower tier body with those two lenses (or a single one cover both ranges, but that won't save any money. It will only result in compromises in optical quality). Of course he can decide to get one of these two bodies + only the short lens, but this would be pretty useless for shooting nature and animals.
In my opinion a lower tier body + 2 lenses + an external flash unit capable of bounce flash is likely to be a more useful kit in more situations than a higher end body and a single kit lens. Even more so if your friend can't point to specific features which are important to him. Just getting something expensive for the sake of getting something expensive doesn't make much consumer sense.
By display I mean printing vs. web display. Displaying the pictures on the web is far less demanding than printing large, which means there's less need to split hairs about minute differences in image quality (aka "pixel peeping"). Even FullHD resolution (which is higher than what most people post on social media) is only 1920x1080 px, which is close to 2 MP. That doesn't sound very high, now does it?
Comment has been collapsed.
All depends on what you use it for and your current lens availability (do you own any lenses or have a friend who does?)
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, then I would look up the compatibility of said lenses and go with that brand. Having a range of lenses is better than the newest processor or sensor; a great lens can take a fantastic picture on a garbage camera, but a garbage lens will always look bad. Good glass retains value.
I'm pretty sure the 7200 can use most Nikon lenses, as well as the 80D for Canon. If his uncle mostly has older non-autofocus lenses then it's up to your user, as he will still have to use the lenses manually.
Comment has been collapsed.
Also, the site dpreview.com has a nice tool that lets you compare models of cameras (current and discontinued) so you can see all of the specs side-by-side
Comment has been collapsed.
This is the best answer I could find to your camera question.
Comment has been collapsed.
The Nikon sensor is slightly bigger I could go for that,
do you have some spare camera I will bring it a new home with me, I really need one, rebel or one 5200, nevermind I will go for a disposable
I heard the Canon can capture colors better. So that depends on your bucket and how much do you plan to spent in lenses. And there is modified software out there for Canon.
Comment has been collapsed.
Man, for a beginner there's not really a big difference in systems, what's more important - what lens do you prefer? When you find your favourite lens (in time) there will be no question about the body - you will just use what suits best.
If you can't yet see difference between lens, than just buy a universal zoom lens with.. any body system you can afford! :)
Comment has been collapsed.
I usually check this site out http://thewirecutter.com/leaderboard/cameras/ I get a good look at what's good
Comment has been collapsed.
16,298 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by MLD
82 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by WaxWorm
56 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Carenard
1,811 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by ngoclong19
72 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Reidor
545 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by UltraMaster
41 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by ViToos
116 Comments - Last post 13 seconds ago by xurc
8 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by StrangeAsAngels
48 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by ManlyMeatMan
17 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by someonequeer
92 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Axelflox
72 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by eeev
9,531 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by NoYeti
Asking for a friend. Which camera is better, the Nikon D7200 or Canon EOS 80D? It's for personal use only. If you have any more questions I could probably relay them back to him.
Bribes
Edit: I will not be replying to most comments because I know pretty much nothing about cameras, but I have to say I am thankful for all answers - even simple bumps, though of course advice is extra-appreciated!
Comment has been collapsed.