Yes?
The idea is cool, but bots will make it impossible. :(
Comment has been collapsed.
There's a small issue with that feature. It only counts the number of times the URL is given out, not the number of people who entered the GA. So there will always be some number of people who get the URL but don't enter for some reason, and that is a wasted slot.
Comment has been collapsed.
26 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by reigifts
20 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by Kyshinn
153 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CalamityUP
107 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by cpyd
16,594 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by WaxWorm
1,081 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by sensualshakti
17 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by MarissaBlackwing
17,322 Comments - Last post 3 seconds ago by cpj128
9 Comments - Last post 37 seconds ago by MarvashMagalli
9 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by AmikoNovich
2,666 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by rapturemelancholia
276 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by HBF1945
22 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by SirSage
216 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ExcelElmira
Hello,
I like doing short giveaways since it gives participants a better chance of winning.
I think it would be a great addition if while creating the GA you could (only if you want) specify a number of entries which once it's reached will stop the giveaway immediately and draw a winner.
Say you want everyone to have a 5% chance of winning, you'll just make the GA run untill 20 people entered. This would also help group/whitelist/invite-only giveaways reach 5 entries and award the creator CV since it will not stop before that happens.
To prevent giveaways that never end and also make it possible to place them in the browse-all section, they should still have a time range where they would end if they don't reach the specified amount of entries. (i.e. GA ends after 2 weeks or when there's 69 entries, whatever comes first)
Comment has been collapsed.