If you haven't played a game in 60 fps then you don't need it. It's not until you go back from 60 to 30 that you notice the difference. It's like getting your first glasses only not important :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, but I mean it helps you react better having 60fps instead of 40fps, or 100fps instead os 60fps? so you can play better, I like to know how feel that ppl who play games at this fps, not how I would feel if played games at this fps.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you're a very competitive person, try to get 60 fps. If you're just casual or competitive but not too competitive 30-40 is fine.
Comment has been collapsed.
To me, I can't tell the difference past 30 FPS. Some can't do under 60 and crazy people can't do under 120. I've heard from people that having more FPS makes the game more reactive to your inputs, so it might matter, but to me no!
Comment has been collapsed.
what graphics card and processor you have? I'm planning to get 660 or 7870, since for a 7950 for example I won't have money.
Comment has been collapsed.
I have a 660 heavily overclocked and does over 40 fps on max settings in BF3.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hey and what CPU you have? because I will get an FX 6300 6X, with 660 GPU, in future I will buy another 660 and put it on SLi, as I read ppl say it won't bottleneck. Since my budget is limited I can't go with an i5-3570K for example, I need to buy a processor for 100€.
Comment has been collapsed.
"Human eye can't see more than 30fps" is completely bullshit, I checked it, so you don't need to confirm.
Comment has been collapsed.
Good ol' can't see more than 30 fps. XD Also If your monitor can't output more than 60 fps, there's no point of going over it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well that's for cod and I don't think it's something a normal gamer would do.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, look at the wonders of a human eye. I got 60hz monitor, yet I do see difference between 100 and 60 fps in Counter Strike even though it is technologically impossible!? Anyway it is out of question to play with less than 100 fps for any serious player of Counter Strike, and even newer Source engine shows big difference in smoothness with rising fps, again even on 60hz monitor. I personally prefer to play pretty much every game in at least 60 fps, but rather 100 and more. It just seems much more pleasing for me.
Comment has been collapsed.
I used to play Borderlands at 15-20 fps before I got my new computer. Don't ask me how.
Comment has been collapsed.
i always wanted to know the difference between 60 fps or 100 fps, anything past 60 fps seems overkill and unnecesary to me
Comment has been collapsed.
The difference is not something you can see, but something you can feel. For instance in shooters it allows for more precision in moving the crosshair around.
Comment has been collapsed.
It is important to have FPS that doesn't fluctuate too much. It's not low FPS that generates visual lags and freezes, it's abrupt aberrations.
Comment has been collapsed.
Ideally, your framerate should be the same as your monitor's refresh rate. The majority of monitors are 60Hz, that's why 60fps is standard. If you have a 60Hz monitor and you are running a game at 100fps, visibly there will be no difference however some games might feel faster due to more hardware polls (smoother mouse).
Comment has been collapsed.
I think 60 fps is something just about every game should be doing, especially these days. It is a huge difference over 30 fps. It really delivers a much smoother, and enjoyable, experience. Console games are really bad when it comes to this. Most of the games seem to run at 30 fps. I can tolerate it, but I'm never happy about it.
I love to have my games looking nice, but I will gladly sacrifice (just about) whatever I can to achieve a constant 60 fps in all of my games (unless it looks really awful, like PlanetSide 2 with the render quality all the way down.. Ew =P), with the exception to games like The Elder Scrolls and being heavily modded (Needing at least 30 fps). Those games I just can't go without them looking beautiful. =P
Comment has been collapsed.
I get headaches if the frame rate is unstable and/or below 60 :)
Comment has been collapsed.
you guys would get eye cancer with my comp, the fps on this stuff is so unstable, sometimes its 50- then 30- sometimes it goes down to 20-10 and goes back to 30
Comment has been collapsed.
Before I upgraded my computer I tried to go for at least 45, lower than that got kinda choppy for me. Now I can do over 100 but I don't really notice much difference between that and 60ish.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's because your monitor is probably has a 60hz refresh rate. Your monitor can't show more than 60 fps
Comment has been collapsed.
Unless you are being paid to win.
So you contradict yourself by admitting that more FPS is required to win, which means more FPS does help enhance one's skills, which means the more FPS the merrier regardless of the situation. Skill is not the only thing that matters. Tell that to a gunslinger when he faces a tank.
Two players with equal skill, one playing at 30 FPS, the other at 60 FPS: The former will lose, no matter what.
Fact. More FPS has a direct impact on your precision and aiming and movement. Even if you don't see it, you feel it and take advantage of it. That's the reason professional players, using high-end rigs, still play on the lowest settings possible (except for resolution, of course).
Comment has been collapsed.
Multiplayer? Yes, because more FPS results in better precision, regardless of your eyes perceiving the extra frames or not. Top tournament players with extreme gaming rigs still play on the lowest settings, and it's because of this reason. You won't see it, but you will most definitely feel it, in multiplayer.
Singleplayer? As long as it's all smooth and playable, enjoyable, no, there shouldn't be need for more than 35, even in shooters.
Done.
Comment has been collapsed.
The thing about lowest settings, I do that too by the way and I'm no near a pro, is also because it reduces the display of many unnecessary things that might "block" view or distract. It reminds me on CSS how with higher settings you'd have all kinds of junk flying around after a grenade exploded.
Comment has been collapsed.
It mostly depends on whether or not you really CARE about it. Of course, running an FPS at 60FPS will allow you to display EVERYTHING that goes on the screen with precision (vsync improves this even further) and smoothness. You'll even see players in tournaments lowering details in games in order to reach the 60FPS mark (or more).
I remember when it was out and hard hitting, Quake III was a great example, the avg player would play with an extreme FOV and easily at around 120FPS, just to be able to react to his opponents.
Comment has been collapsed.
54 Comments - Last post 53 seconds ago by madjoki
252 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by WaxWorm
50 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by Kalzar
291 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by JX8
795 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by FranckCastle
364 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by Zepy
44 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by IronKnightAquila
49 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by madjoki
32 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by viaI
95 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by Axelflox
16,914 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by MjrPITA
28,553 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by FranckCastle
41 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by BlaiddGwyn
2,322 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by canis39
When I play shooters I normally have less than 35 fps, and fps sometimes goes down to 20, I have a question, seems a lot of ppl who have a good gaming PCs prefer having all in ULTRA in a game like Battlefield 3 with 40fps instead of having all on High-Medium but with 60fps.
So here my question: is really important to play at 60fps instead 40fps in game like Battlefield 3? and another for those who have 120hz monitors: it helps you a lot having over 100 fps in shooters or all this thing about playing more than 60fps is bullshit and you won't play better even if game looks smoother?
I don't know nothing about good gaming, in my PC games run very bad I get over 25fps having all down including resolution, but hopefully soon I will buy a new gaming PC :D
Comment has been collapsed.