WHAT THE
Yeah, I saw that a couple days ago and wondered why no one made a thread about it. Sigh...
Comment has been collapsed.
on windows 7 sooo i give the updates a breather before jumping in. waiting for the one that will axe my pc from the steam market
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh, right. How's that going, by the way? Genuine question. Do you have some update blocker? Can you still play games? It's been a while I didn't see the Client Win 7 threads, so I didn't read what you guys talked about it.
Comment has been collapsed.
on my pc i blocked updates and on my old janky laptop ive done nothing what so ever. both run fine now. stupid broken for a while when the new steam ui came out.
let steam update and download a shit ton of games. proceed to block updates and play them well deleting until i have more room to repeat the preprocess until i play every single steam game i own
Comment has been collapsed.
So... Does that mean it still works, even though it officially doesn't support 7 anymore? Do I still have hope for my old Vista laptop?
Comment has been collapsed.
Ah, I see. Makes sense. Thank you for your reply!
Comment has been collapsed.
I know about the games part, but for the client I thought (/misunderstood) that starting January 1st it wasn't going to work anymore. The way Win7 users reacted made me think that way even more since they basically said Steam would be unusable after that date.
I'm not saying it's a good thing nor saying something in the lines of "don't be so dramatic", I hate it when companies do this kind of thing too, it's just that the situation made me a bit confused.
Thank you for your reply!
Comment has been collapsed.
when they do, they break stuff or make things worse more often than not, typical software development stuff
Yeah, exactly why I was expecting the client to break on Win7.
But, I see.
both uplay and origin simply stopped working on win7 recently
Oh. Now that's news to me. Never heard of announcements either, I use EA app Origin like once a year too, but Uplay a bit more often and didn't see any announcement (ads for games yes, client updates no, apart from that ew beta). What's with these two companies with being so eager to worsen the UI/UX?
Comment has been collapsed.
:/
I agree the notifications are kinda weird. Still not getting entirely used to it, but I don't use them much anyway so doesn't bother me too much.
The only complaint I have I how everything is s l o w. I thought I mentioned it above but must have been in another thread, I literally alt tab and use Steam in a browser to browse guides because it takes ages to load in the overlay (like, can take 5 to 10 minutes sometimes). Why? That aside, performance issues; the new UI (since Summer 2023) makes my games perform slightly less good on my non-gaming PC, nothing too noticeable, I see it the most when trying to alt tab. No issues on an IRL's gaming PC. When will companies learn to stop fixing things that aren't broken...
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh, ew. I remember Discord had a similar issue with spoiler content being shown in the Unread drawer (I think).
Sigh. Restarting the PC very regularly is something that I find very annoying with Windows 10. Why does it even eat so much storage? :/
Comment has been collapsed.
This is not new at all, it has worked this way for as far as I can remember. The only thing different is that they added a better description and replaced the key icon with the star.
Comment has been collapsed.
Anyway, this is not pay to win as you put it, it's to prevent abuse. Generating keys is free. Making accounts is free. Therefore if free reviews counted for review scores, rigging reviews would be extremely cheap and easy. The asset flip developers already do this by buying their own games on 10 accounts just to generate a review score. Right now such games are fairly easy to spot. Now imagine if this was free and you could just do it huge numbers without a cost.
Comment has been collapsed.
they can still do this by having the game be 1$ or what ever the lowest price is. buy it 50 times and give 50+ positive reviews. follow this up with a raise game price by 5000%
Comment has been collapsed.
Not really. They lose 30% of that 1$. So, they would lose money by doing this. Also, gifted games don't count for the score as well. Before, scummy devs could just generate a bunch of steam keys, give them away for free to people who will then leave a fake positive review. No risk at all.
Comment has been collapsed.
I personally preferred the Steam/key icons. Simply makes more sense. What even is full and hollow star?
Comment has been collapsed.
new info to me. before it just said this was activated with a key.
Comment has been collapsed.
There are also keys, that add a gift to your inventory, aren't they? 🤔
I thought I stumbled across a few on kinguin
Comment has been collapsed.
https://steamcommunity.com/games/593110/announcements/detail/563352991934009789
Seems it was also abused if they included it in the previous change of the review system. Heck they even removed the dislike number (which is a shame).
Comment has been collapsed.
Big deal? They are trying to curb possible fake reviews. How does your review not count? It's still there, it's readable and people can see it. The only top reviews are the ones that are either new or higher voted right? Nothing really changed.
Comment has been collapsed.
The tooltip is new, but this is how it has worked for many years now.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Steam/comments/1al5ig5/comment/kpcl16i/
Comment has been collapsed.
i know one for a fact that was removed/all games removed from steam for doing this and they just keep bringing the same games back but adding new adjectives to them under a new dev name
Comment has been collapsed.
As of [Sep 12, 2016], the recent and overall review scores we show at the top of a product page will no longer include reviews written by customers that activated the game through a Steam product key.
Comment has been collapsed.
This was litterally a thing from like 2016, 2017. It was done to stop scummy devs from abusing the review system with Steam keys they can easily distribute outside of Steam (they are free to generate), thus boosting their score with fake reviews. Also, why did you lose trust in Steam reviews. This simply doesn't allow user score manipulation by the devs. You can still find the reviews from Steam keys (currator connect and gifts as well) on the game's store page. I don't even know if people use "Steam purchase" filter. I know I don't care for it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Just above the actual reviews there is a line saying stuff like: "Showing 835 reviews that match the filters above ( Mostly Positive )", which also shows the %, if you hover the mouse over the descriptive rating (Mostly Positive in this example). This line accounts for all reviews, no matter how the game have been obtained, that match your filters. Also the actual numbers of All, Positive and Negative reviews for all reviews can be seen still a bit higher, when you hover over "Review Type" button.
Which usually doesn't matter that much, because when the numbers are low, they are very often and easily manipulated by legal (just real friends) and illegal (paid for reviews) means, and when they are high, the difference usually isn't big.
Steam does not do enough to ban devs and users for those false reviews, which IMO should be pretty simple, and insists on keeping the number of reviews needed for the rating at a very low level (10), when instead it should be like a 100 at least, which would make rating manipulation significantly harder, more costly and easier to detect. There should just be many times more unrated games, because (what a surprise) they are not rated by enough players.
Easily deleting spam reviews, that are negative, and rarely deleting spam reviews, that are positive, is the 2nd most important thing, that they do to raise the ratio of positive reviews.
Comment has been collapsed.
Read, yes. The matter here is that these reviews don't count towards the score prominently displayed on the game page.
SteamDB extension calculates the review score using all purchase types + modified formula, so that's one way out of it, but of course only for a small subset of users, it won't change the score calculated and displayed by Valve for the general audience.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well true. I think they wanted to counter some developers giving away games for free for positive reviews - sadly the better way would be to ban such developers as now they just give money to their friends or use fake account to buy their own game with their money to write positive reviews.
It is strange that Steam does not like honest reviews scores. But on the other hand there were bunch of political crybabies posting fake reviews on games also.
I think Steam would need to think about better solutions to review problems or even use 1-10/10 scale instead of people either doing a thumb up or down for games.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 11 months ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
Don't filter out non Steam purchases. Good to go.
My reviews all show up whether they're purchased on Steam or activated with a Steam key.
Also, if the pool of reviews that count towards the percentages is smaller due to the Steam purchase restriction, then each negative review also carries greater weight and affects the overall score more. ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
As others have said it is like this for years.
announcement for keys: (September 2016)
https://store.steampowered.com/oldnews/24155
announcement that from now on it includes gifts as well: (March 2017)
https://steamcommunity.com/games/593110/announcements/detail/563352991934009789
So the difference is that they changed the wording to be more precise but not how it works.
You can still see the positives vs. negatives from your selected countries including all reviews regardless the source btw.
From my experience the difference is minimal sometimes higher sometimes lower but not by much In the long run the trend is the same.
Comment has been collapsed.
^^^ as a Dyslexic i rewrite reviews every single time i notice a spelling or grammatical error sooooooo i often find myself unable to edit because we have notice an usual amount of review editing on your account.......thats just a friday
Comment has been collapsed.
Were Steam reviews ever worth anything?
I consider Steam reviews at the same level I consider IMDB reviews. Some are fanboy/girl-ing, some are trolling, some are just personal opinions and most are irrelevant to whether I will like a game or not.
This being said, I think this will probably lower the game ratings and not increase it.
When you see how many recent games got tons of shit reviews by people who actually buy games just to take a dump on it (because they don't like the studio, because they didn't get what they wanted from the game or because their hopes for this feature or that feature were squashed), and then get refunds... Steam buyers only reviews won't give them better ratings, far from it.
Comment has been collapsed.
try thousands. i usually keep notes well playing the game and slap them all together into a meh length review of + and - some games will be full paragraph or two, but hardly anybody reads them
Comment has been collapsed.
I would have preferred a filter based on playing time rather than how the game was obtained. Indeed, how many comments are made after less than 3 hours of play while HLTB announces 10x more. How can these evaluations be more reliable than those of a player who spent dozens of hours on a game but purchased it from an approved store? It's as if we were giving our opinion after having just read the 10 first pages to a 200-page book, or after having seen 10 minutes of a 2-hour film
Comment has been collapsed.
At least 3 hours is something decent, you can tell after an hour or two if a game is not your type at all...
Let's talk about reviews at 5-10 minutes instead.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, of course. Can you tell the world how good the game is after 5 minutes, though? :kappa:
That's the kind of things we're trying to point out, fake positive reviews.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, that was my whole point. Those kind of reviews wouldn't be a problem, since it's "legit" (although yeah not really useful to just say "not my type", but at least it's a realistic amount of time for the review content). The problem would be the positive reviews after 0.1h of gameplay.
I'm not trying to argue or anything here lol, just pointed out that filters could be even lower than 2-3 hours.
Comment has been collapsed.
Ah, got it. Well, there are games that last 5 minutes (mostly free ones) that are not necessarily bad, so there's that. :-)
In general it would be nice if the review score was weighted, for example using a median playtime.
At least there are filters...
Comment has been collapsed.
Those are of course outliers, lol.
Kinda agree with the weighted thing, but even then it can be abused.
Comment has been collapsed.
There is so much to change in the current reviews. For example I'm interested in a game for the campaign and I see a lot of negative reviews because multiplayer doesn't work or is empty etc. - these have no relevance to me, I'd like to filter them out. Similarly I don't care for negative reviews saying that the game doesn't launch on Windows 11 as I'd be playing on SteamDeck. Or I care more for reviews from people that have 100% achievements than those who have just a few.
Funny enough, all these stats, like achievements, or playing time, or platform, can be spoofed and I just know there would be people who keep abusing it, which of course disincentivises Valve from making changes like that. They focus on what they can 100% control and that is purchase source.
Comment has been collapsed.
You're perfectly right about a lack of filters, as your examples illustrate very well the impertinence of some of the reviews. I agree with you, and on another side I myself have already posted a negative review because the game crashed unexpectedly and turned out to be unplayable.
If they can't control all sheananigans of users (about achievements, playing time and so), they can still help us with new filters that have nothing to do with the way we purchased the games
Comment has been collapsed.
The "All Reviews" section above the dev and publisher have been like that for a long time, at the very least since 2017. When I was running my GA group that started in 2017 for very positive games this is what we went off to prevent dev manipulation of reviews through keys.
Comment has been collapsed.
This has been a thing since the inception of Steam reviews. They're just more open about it. Mainly to just curb review boosting ironically since the only way Steam can verify that you spent money on the game (instead of getting it for free) is by seeing their own records of purchases.
Comment has been collapsed.
161 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Foxhack
702 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by JonathanDoe
1,077 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by steveywonder75
16,577 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by BHTrellis188
69 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by MeguminShiro
260 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Cromwell
45 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by Akylen
8,410 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by yugimax
690 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by JediSnake
240 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by ErhanT
1,531 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by hyrokey
34 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Almostn33t
5 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by cynnix
112 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Yamaraus
new star that shows up next to every single game review if you hover it the text comes up with.
this review is not counted in the overall review score because this user activated the product via a Steam key, received it as a gift, or via temporary license.
98%+ of my games come from outside of the steam store...
Lost all trust in steam reviews now.... with the steam store charging more for games reviews are now pay to win. ಠ_ಠ
fuck me cause im poor so my game reviews dont count because i got the game discounted or even full price but from another seller
https://www.steamgifts.com/giveaway/AHaBSeven/
https://www.steamgifts.com/giveaway/wpI0?/ ?oker
https://www.steamgifts.com/giveaway/?Q8ck/ 1st letter of the bat dogs name
Comment has been collapsed.