The design looks stupid, IMO. I'll stick with desktop gaming until the end.
But some people like tablet gaming, so this would be great for them. Razer looks like its doing a good job.
Comment has been collapsed.
The youtube link that was posted recently said it uses the integrated graphics of the CPU. If so, it's probably quite a bit less than 100w, but also highly doubtful it could run games at ultra settings unless you like could seconds per frame instead of frames per second.
Comment has been collapsed.
It looks good, but for 1000 bucks I'd prefer to buy a cool Alienware laptop
Comment has been collapsed.
Hmm, didn't know that. Well, replace "Alienware" laptop for GAMING laptop.
Comment has been collapsed.
Right off the bat, I can only see problems with that design.
How many PC games do you know that uses more than eight or ten buttons? I can think of quite a few, pretty much anything that is built around a 360's game pad, for example. Games that aren't built for the console's control limitations will be even worse. Granted, there maybe more buttons on the backside that aren't obvious in those pictures, but I just don't see that design holding up.
Besides, what controls the mouse? The motion censors or one of the sticks? I think either way, the device wouldn't be that great as a PC gaming system. A mouse would be so much more accurate and wouldn't make me go nuts. Besides, PC gaming typically doesn't have the auto aim which allows the less accurate means of aiming to be viable.
A powerful tablet isn't a bad idea. But, touting it as a PC gaming machine just won't work. The design simply won't work for PC games.
Comment has been collapsed.
This looks like it won't even get past the conceptual phase.
Comment has been collapsed.
Tb talked about it and i have the exact same opinion. Those razer "gadgets" are getting sillier every year.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KLk_jpDtcc#t=50s
Comment has been collapsed.
That is among the most stupid product I have ever seen.
I'd like to know who the ideal customer is. No one would play that monstrosity in public. And if you're at home you might as well play on your PC on the better screen and better hardware.
Comment has been collapsed.
They're big on concepts, not actual products and feasibility. The cooling system that'll be needed will alone push the weight a little over-the-edge for holding it in your hand comfortably.
By the way, Razer needs to proofread. I see a lot of missing commas.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nice idea, but it's just a novelty. The price is going to kill it and I feel that the enthusiast bandwagon is going to be too small. The only thing it does for certain is ensure the PS Vita's demise, even though that was kind of dead before it started anyway. Had they made it a phone for another $100-$200 (final price around $499.99-$549.99) then they would have had something IMO. It'd sure beat a pricey dedicated portable console at least.
Comment has been collapsed.
I would never buy a console that was a phone.
I can see myself playing a couple hours of games, phone dies, cant make a call for the rest of the day.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm wondering how long will it work with some newer AAA titles? Half hour? Besides - how many PC players will choose these stupid 'pads' instead of the mouse?
Comment has been collapsed.
It connects to a keyboard and mouse if you prefer to use those, so that's not an issue.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's not as much of a hassle as you think since anyone carrying a tablet around will have a case for it which should have room for the peripherals anyway. Not that it's anywhere near as convenient as a laptop though.
Comment has been collapsed.
So...
I should pay a thousand dollars... to do what my laptop can do already, for $800? My laptop has an i7, 2GHz, a Radeon 6770M 1G VRAM, 6GB RAM, a similar sized screen, and to boot it has a keyboard and mouse instead of silly side controllers.
No thanks.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's only 10 inches?
Oh. In that case my screen is a good deal larger. I was guessing about the Razer's screen, I hadn't heard anything since CES. Still, mine's only 15".
Comment has been collapsed.
The i7 is so overrated... I got a Phenom II X6 (6 cores), 3.2 GhZ each for 180 euros, whereas right now Amazon tells me the latest i7 has only four cores (3.4 GhZ each) for 1.5 times the price.
So please people buy AMD :) that way Intel will have to reduce their prices.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, excuse me if AMD has burned out my good will on processors. Never had one worth the time. There's a reason Intel is kicking their ass, market-share wise - Intel processors are just better.
My last computer had a Core 2 Quad Q6600, and that's my dad's computer now, and it's STILL a solid computer. My current has a last-gen i7-920, and I have personally never, ever seen this CPU ever hit 100% usage. Ever.
Comment has been collapsed.
and yet the i7 smashes the X6 in just about everything, the i5 does also...
Comment has been collapsed.
I remember this. My first thought, "oh look at the nice almost identical styled controller to the Wii U tablet."
Not saying that it is identical, but they are still incredibly similar which makes me think that there was some idea sharing happening somewhere. Anyways, I probably wouldn't buy this. I just don't have the money to, but I wouldn't mind having one lying around. Not sure how much I'd use it though. It is cool if it can really play games like Skyrim, though.
Anyway, if I did have the money, I'd just buy a decent desktop for all my gaming needs. Yeah. rambling is fun.
Also, sadly, the size of the large screen is a negative, because it's so big that it would be very awkward to hold it. :(
Comment has been collapsed.
2 Comments - Last post 33 seconds ago by WaxWorm
1,812 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by rashidnemar
43 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by BorschtLover
58 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by SketCZ
85 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by WaxWorm
16,299 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by Carenard
72 Comments - Last post 16 hours ago by Reidor
53 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by moronic
805 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by MayoSlice
10,789 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by WaxWorm
117 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by WaxWorm
24 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by UnbakedBacon
2,810 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by JMM72
57 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Akuburanir
http://www.razerzone.com/projectfiona
A gaming tablet with an i7 ivy bridge, an undisclosed graphics system (But it runs skyrim and spacemarine at very high/ultra), DHX 7.1 sound and of course the multi touch screen.
I think it looks so silly with those controllers, and it you touch the actual tablet while gaming it'll probably fry your fingers off.
So what do you think of it?
Comment has been collapsed.