Whoa! Ad hominem so soon... Congratz! :) You have disregarded my whole post and argumentation, but had no problem calling me idiot, foolish, not-generous enough (by your standards), throughout your whole post... and without any argument or constructive conversation. Weak, dude! :D

I don't have a problem with people not wanting rule breakers getting their games, never said that, I don't want 'em either - and if someone wants to investigate - no problem, investigate away, but there should be much stronger systematic rules and checks, making manual work miniscule. That's all.
Nobody is forbidding investigation, do it if you will and find rule breakers, good for you and the community, but that's the part with trust and reputation - and those should be connected with the system and automation as a whole.

As I said, most people won't get into investigation of winner's profile, for various reasons. That's just the way it is.

One reason I'm rarely making new giveaways is a lot of manual work, lack of automation, hence my efforts and hope for any kind of automation and systematic help. I have a lot of keys and games laying around because I don't have much time for all that manual sending, checking and marking, and especially investigative gamerism.

Seriously Delta, have you always been like this, or did something happen?

You misunderstood the point; why not just accept that instead of going through all this trouble and calling someone an idiot?

Delta, I read the conversation and it appears to me that you're the one who doesn't understand.

If I get it correctly, COLDsteem wants people who break the rules to be flagged by the system and automatically kept out of giveaways.

That's why when he says : "See that is nice, but it would be even better if you could filter out all the people who shouldn't be entering in the first place... so, when the giveaway ends, that's it, no rerolls, and no reason for rerolls."

He obviously states his wish that the system was this way, allowing people to automatically filter out people who broke the rules, as in : "forbid users who regifted", "forbid users who created fake giveaways", etc.

He obviously knows that it's not how the site works.

Someone who - likes you - maintains a big blacklist because he doesn't want people who break the rules to still stick around and win games would actually be pleased with such a functionality, don't you agree ?

"So, you have more of a problem with people not wanting rule breakers getting their games. Right, you are an idiot."

Whoah, there, let's not be carried away. He obviously is the exact opposite of what you're accusing him. Read his posts again, he wants rule breakers to be automatically kept out of giveaways (whenever the creator of said giveaways ticks the box "forbid users who broke the rules").

You're the one who's not getting it, I think you owe the guy an apology.

Unless there is a personal feud between you two that I'm unaware of, in which case, please disregard my intervention.