Agreed Activision isn't lowering the prices for their games, no matter how old they are.

From "high" to "not at all" in less than 2 years? A little too drastic change to not be their fault I guess.

Woah, slow the fuck down mate, first off my friend with an i5/290 can't run this past medium, its the game, the forums are full of complaints, people with 970's are getting stuttering, get your facts straight.

Vid

Link

If SLI 970's have an issue, its the games fault.

BTW I have been building PC's for 15+ years, I know when I see bad optimization. If a 750 ti can't run a game on low thats an issue btw, I can almost max out FC3 and I can max FC2 with stable FPS.

These are the requirements.

MINIMUM:
OS: Windows® 7 (SP1) / Windows® 8 / Windows® 8.1 / (64-bit only)
Processor: 2.6 GHz Intel® Core™ i5-750 or 3.2 GHz AMD Phenom™ II X4 955
Memory: 4 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

I am way above that, FC2 still has better textures and this doesn't look much better then FC3.

At least not for this? It has the same issues as Unity and Watch_Dogs....the stuttering, even on 970's....and thats after patching.

Tried it on three different ones, all had pretty bad stutter, then again people with the highest end rigs can't play past medium it seems without great stuttering.

1st: i3 3rd gen, 8gb 1600 DDR3, 750ti 2gb SuperClocked. - Low-Med gets 23-30fps which to me is unplayable

2nd: i5 2nd gen, 16gb 1833 DDR3, 290 4gb - Low - Med gets 15-45fps, it jumps like nuts on this one, Ubisoft probably didn't even test this on an AMD card... -_-

3rd: AMD 945 X4 3.8, 8gb 1333 DDR3, 460 1gb - Low - med 27-35fps, this one seems most stable, go fucking figure...

Buy at your own risk, all of Ubisofts last couple titles have been like this, Watch_Dogs was also a stuttering mess, it was never fixed, unity seems even worse, I think Ubisoft is committing suicide.