I know the example you give should sound ridiculous... and it does a little, but sure, why not? After all it's the giveaway creator's decision.
It's not like CG hates what he's doing, is it? He enjoys seeing his work profit the community. And it's not like he's on a time limit to do that or has cancer and needs to enjoy every single last moment of his life.
Comment has been collapsed.
The fact remains that CG only has a limited amount of time to spend on the site. He has to get money with which to buy food and loose women. And this suggestion, for reasons which have been explained many times already in this thread, would not profit the community at all. It would be a waste of what little working-on-the-site-time CG has. The fact that it's not mandatory isn't a reason to implement features that help nobody except bot owners and compulsive refreshers.
Comment has been collapsed.
Private and group giveaways can be used to limit entries. A public giveaway is public for a reason - to give everyone a chance to enter and win, not just the people who saw it first and weren't asleep when it was posted.
Comment has been collapsed.
Helloooo sweet friend! I hasten to tell you that I am very serious configured to find its second half. I have long been actively looking for! is going to hope that you will answer me and we will be able to talk with you!woman from far away. Kiss bye :-)
Comment has been collapsed.
Dear woman from far away, thank you for this much needed clarification. By the way, has anyone told you you look exactly like Cult? :-)
Comment has been collapsed.
And who exactly do you think would benefit from such a function? :-)
Comment has been collapsed.
Should be an option to the person hosting the giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.
Because bots would not enter normally anyways and people obviously would not enter, nope none at all, only bots. If there was an option to limit by 200,400,600,800,1000 etc... it would not be that big a deal, some contests end with less people, it would be up to the contest holder, you don't have to do it if you don't want to for your giveaways, nothing is wrong with choices.
Comment has been collapsed.
And again, the question is: who exactly do you think would benefit from such a function?
Everyone?
Certain group of people? What group?
Certain individuals? What individuals?
Comment has been collapsed.
Jesus Christ, you people.
Someone explain to me what advantage an entry cap has over a normal time-limited giveaway. What benefit is there? If you make a giveaway with 50 possible entries, 99% of the time a bot will win because if this gets put in, there will be more bots to take advantage of it. FACT. If you make a giveaway with 500 possible entries, you might as well have just set it to one hour anyway. Where is the benefit to this?? Why does it seem so attractive to people?
Comment has been collapsed.
Alright, I was thinking that these came up once a week, but it seems I was slightly off. Apparently these come up just as soon as the last one has left the top threads for a little bit.
I'll explain a concept here. Making an entry limit only "benefits" the people entering. There's no real reason why the gifter would care how many people enter their giveaway and so they have no reason to set a limit. If for some reason the gifter wants to set a limit then they already have options. They can either just make it a 1 hour long giveaway or they can make a Steam group and make the giveaway just for them. The only people that a limit actually benefits is those with bots or those who have no life and spend their whole time just refreshing the page to grab the newest giveaways.
Comment has been collapsed.
Remember, you got more of a chance to winning a 3000 entry giveaway, than a 50 entry giveaway no one but bots or people refreshing the page every 5 secs would be able to get, since entry-limited giveaways would probably fill up within a couple of minutes.
Comment has been collapsed.
" i know its a simple idea and maybe someone already had it before, but im feeling like i need to present it anyway."
There have been and there was one yesterday, the day before that, the day before that, ect. Please read.
/summarized rant
Comment has been collapsed.
Wow, really, so many opinions. Sorry about not using the search, but i'm a noob around here. Anyway, i think at least this topic is making me think a little more, but what is this bot thing? A guy can make a bot to have 100 entries or what? I normally enter only 400 to less giveaways. I pass away from games like Minecraft that get 4000 entries in 2 seconds...
Comment has been collapsed.
Except TF2R does this, and offers games, and has no real problems with it.
Just use Team fortress 2 raffles if you want a chance to win something, and just go to group giveaways on steamgifts, the open raffles are pointless to enter.
Comment has been collapsed.
50 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by sagan
206 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Joey2741
26 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Jarda
31 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Pika8
16,295 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Haplodh
1,519 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Tristar
1,798 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Cacciaguida
28,246 Comments - Last post 8 seconds ago by Chris76de
15 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Lugum
7,972 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by steveywonder75
24 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by JMM72
97 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by JMM72
108 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by s4k1s
10 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Heitor112
Hey there, i know its a simple idea and maybe someone already had it before, but im feeling like i need to present it anyway.
Well, wouldn't be cool if there was an option when creating a giveaway that would lock to a maximum number of entries? There would be a minimum and a maximum number, it could be 30 and 2500-3000 for example.
No, really, wouldn't it be nice? I think it would make it easier to win something, you know, to win a 2345 entries giveaway you need to have a fu****g luck, and almost every good game here is inside that average of entries...
So comunity, what do you think about it?
Comment has been collapsed.