I played both.
Play the remaster, it's better. Most people review it negatively, because they have trouble running it (crashs), but I haven't noticed any issues.
Comment has been collapsed.
Original has better graphics imo. Also better atmosphere - because they removed a lot of things water related (wet floors, sinking windows and so on). Also original can work on now outdated pc without problems and remaster has shitty optimization. Also when I tried to play remaster of bs2 - it was crashing to desktop quite often (like 3 times during one hour) while original crashed maybe 2 times during whole game.
Seriously it's not only not needed remaster but also one of those lazily made.
Comment has been collapsed.
Played the first game with the remaster, Never crashed, looked slightly better than the original, framerate was smooth. The audio was the only issue, but I am guessing that's also a problem in the OG version. I don't think there is any difference in gameplay.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you're an achievement hunter, Bioshock 1 Remaster has achievements while the OG does not. On the other hand, many people report they've experienced a lot of crashes with the remaster. It's been a while, but I don't think I ran into many problems when I played it.
Comment has been collapsed.
I played the OG, so can't compare it, but it ran nicely, so the only reason to play remaster would be for achvs.
I also played the OG BS2, even though at that time I could have chosen to play remaster. Again, I guess achvs might make a difference, as they cleaned up some of them in the remaster (MP-only ones I think)
Comment has been collapsed.
I tried the original Bioshock first, but had no audio and couldn't find a working solution for that, The remaster needed an update for my win 7 and microsoft disabled the windows update function in their last update for that system. With some workarounds i could enable the update function again on my win 7 and so i could install the necesarry update i downloaded from github. You won't have this problem with win 10. Also the remaster has some nice achievements to collect.
I played both remaster versions with a few crashes. There are some really good guides on steam on how to run them minimazing the number of crashes. Bioshock 1 can be finished with a few occasional crashes. Bioshock 2 really needed that bugfix, because my game crashed whenever i tried to use a vending machine, sometimes even when i went to the main menu to save my progress. Afterwards i had as much crashes in 20 hours as i had in 2 before.
Comment has been collapsed.
I just finished playing the Remaster a few weeks ago... Bioshock is still a fantastic game, even all these years after its original release. There's a reason so many others have imitated its mechanics. If you play the Remaster rather than the OG, I would recommend sitting through the Director's commentaries after you finish. I don't usually go in for that stuff, but I actually found it quite interesting.
As reported, there's a few stability issues. I found there was a fairly high risk of crashing whenever I opened the level map. If I avoided doing that, I avoided 99% of the crashes. Once, and only once, I experienced a crash-on-save that deleted my save game. I made sure to alternate save slots after that, but it turned out to be unnecessary.
Comment has been collapsed.
I agree with you on the graphical presentation which oddly enough is a common opinion regarding remasters. I didn't have any technical troubles playing through the remaster though. I think they solved most of the issues early on but I may be misremembering things and I've just been lucky.
Comment has been collapsed.
remastered ;) i played both and the remastered got achievements and better textures and well optimized , the video is old and they fixed most of the glitches i think cause i didn't have any problems playing it
Comment has been collapsed.
wow, remastered looks like a console game
im just here for the results.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
86 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
643 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Yorickmeister
62 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
41 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Chris76de
177 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by wigglenose
286 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by hbouma
864 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by Ashtart
61 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by LieEater
171 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Fyoll
31 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by PapaSmok
17,007 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by MjrPITA
28,924 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by XonX
20 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Reimaishere
9,762 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by DrT3RR0R
hey guys, i got bioshock OG and also the remaster games on steam. i wanted toplay bioshock more and played it only a few hours when it came out i stopped because of work etc. and lost it in my pile of games to play. now with the remaster which version would you recommend? i dont care much about graphics, more about the gameplay etc. thx
Edit:
graphicwise i prefer the OG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzMlk8Fpwvk
Comment has been collapsed.