Nothing changed. Random is random. So, basically you just have bad luck and you are below the statistically expected value. Consider luck/winning a bell curve. The majority will win the number of giveaways which they statistically are "supposed" to while some might be on the edges of the curve either far surpassing their "supposed" wins or being far below.
So, in short it is bad luck and somewhere is your counter-pole having +2.13 gifts. You are doing something good :P
Comment has been collapsed.
So, in short it is bad luck and somewhere is your counter-pole having +2.13 gifts.
It would be actually normalized before by making this into a percentage luck, flat 2 difference is not the same when you win 1 instead of 3, or 44 instead of 46.
Winning 44 instead of the expected 46 places it at 95.7 luck, and its counterpoint would be somebody with 104.3 luck
Comment has been collapsed.
Given the exploitative behavior of the majority of members there's a trend to group only/invite only giveaways. Relying purely on public giveaways might not be the most promising strategy.
Besides, did you neglect the deities you worship and missed to offer the necessary sacrifices?
Comment has been collapsed.
https://www.steamgifts.com/discussions/group-recruitment would be a start. Additionally, you could search for groups on Steam which match your interests.
Comment has been collapsed.
For the monthly luck calculation it's irrelevant how many giveaways shifted to groups or invite. You are still either more or less lucky than your average expected wins. either way.
And it's incorrect that there is such a trend, in the past 4 years the shares for each kind of giveaways have been pretty stable.
Comment has been collapsed.
Mine went to -6 at its lowest to +2 at the highest, and is sitting at -2 right now. https://i.ibb.co/PMfVBsg/Image1.jpg
Comment has been collapsed.
I believe it is counted from chances to win entered giveaways, cause it kinda fits I can't be unlucky.
https://ibb.co/Zdb0ZHH
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, I understand how the number of predicted gifts based on the average is calculated. What I'm wondering is, does the site favor winners based on how unlucky they have been? Or is it completely random, and I just happened to get really unlucky, and then really lucky, in consecutive months.
Comment has been collapsed.
Just bad luck. For the past 3 months I was -2.7, -1.0, -1.2. I am still +9 overall since I joined though.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't mind. I have won a lot of games and have a huge backlog to play though. It has been negative for a few months, but it has been positive before that and will be positive again. I try not to look at that stats page too often.
Comment has been collapsed.
286 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Wok
159 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by KevinWin789
396 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Wok
1,248 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by logorkill
39 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Foxhack
8 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by TheLimeyDragon
82 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by GarlicToast
83 Comments - Last post 36 seconds ago by root777
5 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by hbguru
219 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by ChestnutS
21 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by quijote3000
650 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by RePlayBe
32 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by Darshao
4 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by t3aztv
So I decided to give the site a proper go since mid-December after kind of taking a break, I've entered a load of giveaways and for the last 2.5 months, my estimated giveaways is on -2.13 gifts. Has something changed as I don't remember it being like this before?
Comment has been collapsed.