I know suggesting things here is a bit risky at times but i'm a glutton for punishment so i'm going to throw my hat into the ring regarding the whole CV debacle.

How about turning the contributor value into a currency that will buy into giveaways?

For example:

  • I currently have $255 in CV, that would be converted into 255 Contributor Points (CP).
  • A user giving away a game can opt to set a certain amount of CP required for users to enter the giveaway.
  • Let's say cg is giving away Bioshock Infinite instead of putting $1000 CV he sets it to 200 CP
  • I decide to enter this giveaway with my 255 CP collected and the system then deducts 200 CP leaving me with 55 points remaining.

You earn points by giving away games based on the current point value (so Bioshock Infinite would give you 60 CP). This will create a contributor economy and help to reduce exploitation while giving incentive/reward. You must constantly GIVE to GET, no more farming $1000 CV and "sitting pretty".

Feel free to discuss and tweak this idea, I find it would help bring back some of the original spirit of this wonderful site.

EDIT: I'd like to point out that the current way of gaining points would not change this is purely a subsitute reward system for the currently in place CV dollar value incentive. Public giveaways will still exist with the current point system that caps at 300p


rainynight65 summed my initial idea up perfectly in case I wasn't clear enough above:

The way I understand this is:

  • Public giveaways don't change at all.

  • When you complete a giveaway, you get points to the value of the game, same as now.

  • If you want to enter an exclusive giveaway, instead of having to have a certain threshold, you have to use your points. Which means you have to build them up again. Someone creates a contrib only GA and decides its worth 100 points. If you haven't got 100 points, you can't enter. If you do, you enter, but lose those points, so you have to GA more the get them back.

If that's how it is intended, I can get behind it. Combine it with the current checks and balances, add a few tweaks, and you'd have more of an incentive to give than what's currently in place.

11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Yum. Brownies. CP...means either fan-shipping in China or that unspeakable thing.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

lol TG

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Cheese Pizza?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nooo! You have unleashed the wrath of the Pizza Overlords!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, its probably canned peaches.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Cold Play?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Copy and Paste

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Captain Picard!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No. That's even more segregative and juicy for exploitation from my point of view.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It will need to be combined with all the other checks and balances that are in place.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

exactly what i think.... have you been to galagiveaways? its hell in there.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I peaked into it once or twice. Yeah,that's the kind of thing that reminded me of.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It is similar to Gala but of course this can be tweaked and balanced better with the SG system and policies already in place. CP points can be lowered to only 1p for bundle games for example to help discourage similar farming that is going on with the CV system

CP is also optional, it is not the main currency method the standard point system that caps at 300p would still be in place.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Seems bad, seems like Galagiveaways.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

or playblink charity

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

or gameminer gold

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

its not like either of those because CP doesn't become the main currency method it purely optional like adding CV is.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I just don't see how its better or less exploitable is all.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well I don't think there will ever be a system you can't exploit one way or another to various degrees but I think its a better reward system than the current CV incentive. Keep in mind putting CP on a giveaway is OPTIONAL therefore people who want to enter a CP giveaway will have no choice but to GIVE to GET constantly, not just accumulate a high contributor value by spending $20 and keep reaping the rewards indefinitely.

I think it will have a much greater reward factor as you won't want to waste CP points as they are harder to come by. The regular points will still continue to flow as people make giveaways so it won't convert the site into a Gala, Playblink or any of the others its simply a choice the user giving the game away has to reward those that keep the spirit of this place alive.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

People will still gain points by farming exploits, really nothing will change, it will just make it more complicated and possibly worse. Thats just how I see it though.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

but they would need to giveaway more games to enter in more giveaways, it wouldn't be like now, that if you've contributed with $10 (like me) you can enter all the $10 ga.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes, give away more exploited games to enter non exploited CV games, got that part. You don't see CV abuse becoming a problem? Just gonna quote GerardinHo now

Plus, farmers gonna farm anyway, so if they need 60p to enter Bioshock Inifinte, we minions would probably get 3 Bioshock / ACII / whatever's worth 20p giveaways.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Don't you just love quoting out of context?

Here's the full quote:

This way you'd REALLY think before entering a giveaway for a game you're not sure if you'd want. I like it. Plus, farmers gonna farm anyway, so if they need 60p to enter Bioshock Inifinte, we minions would probably get 3 Bioshock / ACII / whatever's worth 20p giveaways. And I like that as well.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not sure what your point is, I didn't quote the whole thing because I didn't feel like making it unnecessarily long, the point remains the same.

The point being that "farmers gonna farm anyway"(Oh look I quoted out of context again lol). Just because he likes it doesn't negate the point he made....in other words this system would change nothing and possibly make it worse, that is all.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

pretty much galagib and heavily encourages to abusing and exploiting. Increases quantity,decreases quality.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd like to point out that the current way of gaining points would not change this is purely a subsitute reward system for the currently in place CV incentive.

You can still enter giveaways the normal way.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

sounds bad

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

So turn this into a corrupted steamtrades? No.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That would end up costing as much as much or more than just buying the games yourself.

Just a thought.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The user doesn't have to put CP as a requirement on the giveaway - if they choose they can leave it open for the normal point method to be used to gain entry.

I'm suggesting two methods of entering giveaways, CP is purely optional to the giveaway creator

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The way I understand this is:

Public giveaways don't change at all.

When you complete a giveaway, you get points to the value of the game, same as now.

If you want to enter an exclusive giveaway, instead of having to have a certain threshold, you have to use your points. Which means you have to build them up again. Someone creates a contrib only GA and decides its worth 100 points. If you haven't got 100 points, you can't enter. If you do, you enter, but lose those points, so you have to GA more the get them back.

If that's how it is intended, I can get behind it. Combine it with the current checks and balances, add a few tweaks, and you'd have more of an incentive to give than what's currently in place.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That is exactly what I am proposing - thank you for helping my current scatterbrain =)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I could understand SG going that route, it would certainly get me to give away a bit more.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Its like playblink and i don't like that site too much. Also galagiveaways or something

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In the end there's not really any difference. If this is being suggested to alleviate point farming, it would not work in that capacity. Both methods require giving away games to earn points to enter exclusive giveaways, so the people who are "farming" points to enter them would continue to do so. If the end result doesn't change the way people do things, there's really no point in making the change in the first place.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thats basically what I think about this idea.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The difference is the people farming CV currently don't have to continue doing so once they hit a magic number. This system would ensure you continue to give to get because your points get deducted upon entering said giveaway and do not stay constant (for the most part) like the current CV dollar amount system.

Bundle games can have point value decreasd so they cannot be used to earn points in an abused manner - if somebody wants to spend $60 on Crazy Machine keys to get 60 Contributor Points to enter Bioshock Infinite they may was well have bought it outright. People are going to want to spend these points wisely or stick to the public giveaway system.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The people giving away games out of generosity or just for the sake of giving will continue to do so regardless of the points system.

The people giving away games to get themselves to a point where they have enough CV to get them into some exclusive giveaways will be much less likely to do so if they know that they will have to continue to give games away to keep that advantage. Basically it would lower the incentive to give games away, causing less people to make giveaways. And less giveaways = bad.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Doesn't work well for bundles which are bundled retroactively

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well that's kind of like doing the GameMiner or GalaGiveaways system and I prefer SteamGifts over those other sites. Therefore, bad idea.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's purely optional like putting a CV requirement currently is, public giveaways with the regular point system don't change.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd agree, but no setting up ' contributor points to enter giveaways.

For me it could be the real price of the game, so, for an example, red orchestra (currently $9.99) would cost 10'CP' to enter (if set to contributor giveaway)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This way you'd REALLY think before entering a giveaway for a game you're not sure if you'd want. I like it. Plus, farmers gonna farm anyway, so if they need 60p to enter Bioshock Inifinte, we minions would probably get 3 Bioshock / ACII / whatever's worth 20p giveaways. And I like that as well.

Not such a huge fan of being able to choose how many CP the entry would cost, though. It should be the same as the $ value imho, or maybe 10% less than the actual price of the game, to discourage "Well, fuck, I could buy the game and that's the end of it" kind of thinking.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's what I said above :D

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Noticed it xD it just took me fucking forever to make a coherent sentence out of it, and when I sent it, yours appeared before xP

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not convinced. I'd prefer to see them converted into gold bullion.

There's nothing safer than gold right now.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

people would abuse the system even more if it'll be that way...

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It would take one awesome giveaway with high CP requirement to bring about a shitload of other, minor GAs just to get the CP needed. Yep.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

♥♥♥♥ yes, I would.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you lose the giveaway, I think you should get ~-90-95% of the CP back if you lose, so all that you given away isn't completely useless in that regard, but you still lose some so you have to think about it first.

Other then that, I agree with it.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

INDIEGALAGIVEAWAYS!!! keep^it out of HERE

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No. Just no.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Also, your contributor points balance should be halved every 3 days, just to keep people from hoarding contributor points.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

o.0

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You disapprove?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

heh, not in a position to approve or disapprove :P dun have too much CV to care..

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Stupid, all stupid!

That would just give more of a reason for exploiters to buy games like crazy machines, give them away with no limitations and profit from a couple of coins in the long run by winning 50€ games, no thanks. Said games should be added to the bundle list for good reasons.

I would support if this CP was something monthly and a special type of giveaway was added to the list, at each new month, the CV would reset to it's original full value, and if you ended up making giveaways in the mddle of the month, obviously you would get CV in return to get instantly used within the same month.

Also CV giveaways should be based on full price of each game at the moment on steam, like giving away skyrim for 40 points/CV. CV would act as a special "currency" in this website, not entirelly necessary to win things but it would help. And to make things even more legit, CV giveaways should be up to half the CV value in your profile (eg: if you have 300€ CV, you can make CV giveaways per month up to a value of 150€).

tl;dr

Make a 4th option for contributor value only giveaways, said giveaways would work with monthly limitations and a new currency (1/2 of your CV can be used to make giveaways each month, full CV is used to enter said giveaways [reset each month, eg: 40€ skyrim would deduct 40€ from your total CV at the time]). And most importantly, remove the current CV option from all giveaways, except these new ones. Basically: Public, Group, Private, Contributor.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's clearly not all stupid if you were able to take the concept and tweak it. This is why I made this suggestion thread so that we can all debate on how to implement this concept for the greater good of this site. Nothing should be taken at face value.

I don't personally agree with your modification but its good food for thought nevertheless - one idea spawns another and that is how progress is made.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This doesn't in any way solve the bundle spam that occurs for contrib.

And if it is spammed fast enough, people could spend the points before it is turned into a bundle.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by H1N1337.