Not entering, but quite a lot of strategy games in there. Nice train, Fnord!
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm surprised that they did not use more railway artillery. In particular during WW1, on the western front, they had time to adapt the infrastructure to carry it, and it would allow them to hit the opposing side really hard. But then again, if the technology is not quite there yet, it might have been too much of a gamble.
Comment has been collapsed.
47,256 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by JMM72
24 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by Drughi14
14 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by FluffyKittenChan
5 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Sh4dowKill
2,250 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Hikkomi
30 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by MeguminShiro
9 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by Akylen
97 Comments - Last post 52 seconds ago by GeekDoesStuff
0 Comments - Created 5 minutes ago by Lironezzz
40 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by Masafor
8 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Masafor
946 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by JMM72
103 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by VinroyIsViral
10,923 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by JMM72
Or just a train full of strategy?
>>
In trying to find a picture of an armoured train, I found a site which I think might just be a Russian propaganda site, going by both the tone, and its very.. erm.. selective use of facts (what was said on it was not untrue, just very selective). According to it we might see more armoured trains from Russian in the future!
Comment has been collapsed.