Not entering, but quite a lot of strategy games in there. Nice train, Fnord!
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm surprised that they did not use more railway artillery. In particular during WW1, on the western front, they had time to adapt the infrastructure to carry it, and it would allow them to hit the opposing side really hard. But then again, if the technology is not quite there yet, it might have been too much of a gamble.
Comment has been collapsed.
27 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Slvco
8 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by lostsoul67
1,818 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by SuperT
384 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by NoYeti
16,302 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by GeoSol
47,108 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by BlazeHaze
8 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by kudomonster
157 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Swordoffury
123 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by cheeki7
869 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Zarddin
16,790 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by RDMCz
76 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Butterkatt
46 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by greddo
1,600 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Masafor
Or just a train full of strategy?
>>
In trying to find a picture of an armoured train, I found a site which I think might just be a Russian propaganda site, going by both the tone, and its very.. erm.. selective use of facts (what was said on it was not untrue, just very selective). According to it we might see more armoured trains from Russian in the future!
Comment has been collapsed.