Not entering, but quite a lot of strategy games in there. Nice train, Fnord!
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm surprised that they did not use more railway artillery. In particular during WW1, on the western front, they had time to adapt the infrastructure to carry it, and it would allow them to hit the opposing side really hard. But then again, if the technology is not quite there yet, it might have been too much of a gamble.
Comment has been collapsed.
7 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by moronic
11 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by zolof
24 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Mechanicc
14 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by bat0
47 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by StormSonic
1,258 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Sundance85
36 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by s4cr1f1c3
137 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by ChimChakMan
14 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by ChimChakMan
929 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by CultofPersonalitea
15 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by CultofPersonalitea
1,784 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Mhol1071
51 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by PoeticKatana
511 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by pampuch721
Or just a train full of strategy?
>>
In trying to find a picture of an armoured train, I found a site which I think might just be a Russian propaganda site, going by both the tone, and its very.. erm.. selective use of facts (what was said on it was not untrue, just very selective). According to it we might see more armoured trains from Russian in the future!
Comment has been collapsed.