Do you have a potatoe machine?
Nope. My SG username is just words to match the image. It isn't even the words that prompted the creation of the image many, many years ago.
But if my avatar was a picture of Clem from The Walking Dead: Season One, then the text to accompany it might be "My Darling Clementine". And that was the case for my Steam profile for about six months after I completed the game. Then I recycled this old image.
Comment has been collapsed.
Awkward was being asked about my user name, explaining it was "[i]ust a profile name to match my avatar," and then being told it still supposedly a reference to my own "broken heart".
I'm sure you've met someone whose username matches their avatar rather than the other way around. You just haven't been aware of it.
I'm not sure if I should tell you my user name often has absolutely nothing to do with my avatar. My first name here was regifterer, but that probably caused more curiosity than chuckles, so I changed it to giftasaurus on an impulse, but giftasaurus is stupid and boring. So here we are.
P.S. To be clear, this is what happened: 15 years ago or thereabout I created this image in Photoshop. It was the visual manifestation of an idea, of a phrase. Half as many years to the present later, I didn't want to use that specific phrase and so I crafted a different phrase that still references the symbolic heart. "Her Broken Heart" is that second phrase.
Comment has been collapsed.
I am able to choose my username. I made an initial choice, and then a second, that referenced the nature of the activity on this site. I then made a third choice that referenced a prior, secondary interpretation of my image. It is not a connection with an object (the image) but with a concept (what the image represents).
A broken heart is a figurative concept. A heart bountiful with both love and hate is another figurative concept. The latter is the original concept that led to the creation of the image.
Your interpretation of a "corrupted heart" is another interpretation, one to which I personally warrant little consideration as I already have my interpretations and do not need another, especially when your interpretation is expressed in a fashion seemingly meant to undermine my own. Perhaps you think that is a harsh characterization but from my perspective I'm tasked with posting yet again to somehow defend and clarify my choice of username even though I thought I had been quite clear in earlier posts.
If what I say makes no sense to you it is because you are choosing to assert your own expectations regarding usernames above my stated explanation, which is lucid and rational, regardless of whether other users would consider crafting their username via the same methodology.
If you feel attacked that's not my intention. I just don't see what difficulty you have in understanding my explanation or my motivation regarding my username. Perhaps you could enlighten me.
Comment has been collapsed.
I am not offended or attacked with your technique of picking your username. I'm generally trying to understand why connecting the avatar with "HerBrokenHeart" in particular? Why not "HisBrokenHeart" or even "Yin Yan" since the avatar does have some little reference to the good in bad and bad in good? And why not choose a username that discribes you, and not something you made?
My username for example might sound odd or ilogical because my real name is Amine. However, it does reference me. My last name is Azarou(its corresponding in my mother language is pronounced differently) and it means tiny rocks in my mother language, tiny rocks that are used to build and construct. Moreover, I'm bold, I was known since I was child with my physical strength, I could endure physical pain and I'm stuborn, therefore you can call me a rock because I'm hard to move unless it's by my own well.
I might consider that you don't take usernames seriously? Perhaps that's the main reason you don't actually stay on a single one?
Comment has been collapsed.
I didn't feel you were offended or attacked by how I came about my username, because if someone was that would be kind of weird and mostly their problem. I was trying to ensure that you did not feel like I was attacking you with my posts.
Why "HisBrokenHeart"? Because I am male? Why does a username have to be a direct (or indirect) reference to oneself? How is HisBrokenHeart any more valid than HerBrokenHeart when it is not a reference to a specific person?
You seem to take the position that a username is tied to its user in a way that meaningfully explains something about them, like how your name means little rocks and how you consider yourself to be a rock, but not everyone's username reveals something they think about themselves. If you said what you did about your name and said that you had faced difficult obstacles in your life, would it be wrong for your name to be RockyRoad with a picture of the ice cream instead of a picture of say a rocky road?
And what counts as taking a username "seriously"? If I didn't take it seriously--if I were indifferent, presumably--then I wouldn't feel a need to change it.
What of people who choose a username after their favorite band but years later no longer listen to that band's music?
Or name themselves in part after a literary character for a book whose charm they outgrew?
What of young men who use pictures of attractive women they do not know as their avatar?
I still feel like the gulf here is your expectation of what a username should be, and I assure you that I am not the exception to a rule--though I may be uncommon--but that your expectations are limiting and inflexible.
It is precisely because I have more interest in my own username than most probably have in theirs that I have sometimes changed it on services where changing it is possible.
My earliest online experience was on IRC, where nicknames can be changed at any time. I mostly used the same nicknames because consistency matters a bit, but I did have more than one.
I was on AOL for quite a while (even after getting broadband cable from another ISP) because of a unique community and activity that did not and still does not exist elsewhere on the 'net. When AOL gave users the ability to use up to 7 sub-accounts, I began to often go onto a sub-account to create a new name, and then go back to my community. Sometimes I'd pretend I wasn't me for fun, but mostly it was about being clever in choosing a new name, getting into mischief with it, exploiting AOL's name system, or some other such thing. Several of us did it and very few people that were part of my community for a long period of time were known by a single username the whole time. Though the vast majority were pretty consistent and stable in their choice, and almost always have a defining username and thus a handle. In that way I am the very rare exception as by the end I had no defining handle. But it was pretty much standard in our community for everyone to know each other's first name so that became my only "identity" as time passed whereas for most others, it was a handle as well as a first name (sometimes with the former disambiguating the latter from another with the same name). My name is uncommon enough that it doesn't require disambiguation. So there's that. Anyway, it doesn't help that for whatever reason a person may "lose" their AOL account and thus have their original and preferred account name unavailable to them. Because during my AOL run I had several different accounts I could not have used the same name the entire time anyway.
On Steam there have been periods where I changed my profile name a bunch. When I was a mod on a L4D2 server and I had the ability to change my own name on the server--as well as that of others users--I had a lot of fun playing around with it, sometimes to the amusement (or annoyance) of others. It was part of how I admin'd and it made me distinct from the other admins. But I was just trying to have fun as we all played the same campaigns for the hundredth time.
As I too can be confused by frequent profile name changes that some people make, after deciding that I felt like playing around with my profile name a bunch after being "My Darling Clementine" for half a year after I finished TWD:S1, I first chose to go back to the most "handle" of my handles, and the one that best represents my avatar now as well as changing my avatar to this current image. And then I did nothing for a period of time to "stabilize". Then I fooled around with my profile name, knowing that anyone who is actually looking for me on their list can find my very distinctive avatar.
But I do have several "handles". Names I chose that were prominent and long-lived enough within certain communities in which I participated frequently over a long period of time to qualify as a handle. There have been more than a handful of them over the many years but I still know what name I used where for any place that was memorable, if I had a 'handle' there. Some of these handles were used in several places--others just once.
But usernames on random sites? I long ago broke the habit of signing up everywhere with the same username. Why? Because it just identifies you as the same person everywhere if your username is sufficiently unique enough (and if it isn't unique enough you have to vary it or use an alternate if it is taken). Using the same username everywhere makes it easier for online assholes to harass or target you (not that this has ever been a problem for me), for you to be traced back to activity from years earlier (not that I am worried about the feds coming for me), and easier to phish/exploit/hack your accounts when you use the same username/email/password combinations everywhere (not much of a concern when you only know 1% of your passwords, use MFA whenever it is available, and avoid the security backdoors that are application passwords).
So, like with AOL giving me the ability to change my name, I embraced being creative in my usernames when registering accounts online after I began to use a password (account) manager, instead of sticking to a handle by rote. Usually I try to quickly think up a username related to the site, but I have no special attachment to it most of the time (except perhaps a little bit if I really think it was a wonderful example of gee whiz look how clever this username is). If I become more invested in the community I may wish that I had a username that better reflects whom I want to present myself as, but 95% of the accounts you register for online don't even have a real community associated with them anyway (or you never get involved with it), so it's often a moot point.
If you don't want to call me HerBrokenHeart because you don't think it is sufficiently attached to me, that is fine. It wasn't my choice. fireworks was taken. So I chose HerBrokenHeart. But fireworks is a handle of mine, and my current Steam profile name. Quite generic, though.
Maybe I should go back to "For Sale: One Used Sex Machine" on Steam, as I was in fall/winter 2014. If nothing else, it engendered offers to what the sex machine was and how much it cost (it was the Queen of England's, and the price is a million dollars).
Comment has been collapsed.
I understand now why you used your misleading and unique username. I understand you try to be "annonymous", not that it's a bad thing, I do that in real life actually, there are plenty of people who asked me about information regarding my life(where I live or where I was born for example) and I usually lie just because those who asked did not earn my trust to tell them the truth.
I said why exactly "Her..." and not "His..." because I believe you do have something involved in this, I mean it can't be random, not just because you're a male. Perhaps you think of a loved one? Or maybe you think females have higher probability to get their hearts broken? Or maybe you think a female's broken heart reflects the situation better than a male's? There are a lot of possibilities here that I can't really count, some are distinct and some differ from others with the slightiest part.
I don't treat people as objects with tags or identities. I'd rather treat them as a person, a human being, but we're bound to identities, you can't simply trust someone that you know nothing about, your trust to him tends to zero, but when you at least have his identity which is by definition just another factor among several regardless of the fact that legally an indentity means nearly everything about a person, you can elevate that trust, no matter what's the figure you added, it remains a change and became better. Take this as your "way of hiding", you don't want people to know because you perhaps don't trust them thus you keep changing your username and avoid having a handle. People, at least some of them tend to not trust people with no identities the same way you don' trust people with identities.
And now since you actually explained this better than expected, I find both your username and avatar actually do reflect you as a person, regardless of the fact that you don't want a handle for yourself. The moment I first saw your username and avatar, your idea of remaining without a handle does apply, but now since I know why you do it, I can build an initial opinion on you. I can consider you a real person, a person who seeks annonymity and doesn't want anyone to know him, probably over-cautious, or maybe just satisfied with you have. I could even say you just don't like redundancy.
Comment has been collapsed.
You say it can't be random, but it can. Or it can be a reason I'm not conscious of. Doesn't matter. For all intents and purposes Her instead of Him reflects an arbitrary preference that is not necessarily an insight into my experiences or feelings.
A handle is an identity only in the most basic sense. You're trying to psychoanalyze my preferences regarding profile and user names by pinning it to trust and my own personal desires or insecurities and ignoring for instance that I said one of my first environments (and in fact my first true community) was one where our first names were our effective identities since they were known and static. Usernames can and did vary and thus were relegated to a secondary status. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough about the fact that we knew each other's names and thus absolutely this was more useful information than knowing all of a person's usernames. Additionally, while it's hard to recall, I'm pretty sure that for the most part after someone was known a little better, you wouldn't say, "where's username?" or "username, how was the party?" you'd say, "where's Lindsay?" or "Lindsay, how was the party?" In that way, in our community, our "handles" were a hell of a lot more revealing than a typical handle, since they weren't a creation of our own, but our given names. It wasn't how we wanted to be addressed or identified online, it was how were were addressed and identified already (with a few exceptions--obviously someone called "Jenny" her whole life by family and friends may choose to be called, "Jennifer" when introducing herself to others in a distinctly separate environment from her home and school/work life).
Anyway, I didn't change usernames to be anonymous within our small community. I changed usernames because I could. It wasn't about hiding. It wasn't about trust. I have kept in contact with people from that group and there is a private Facebook group for members of that community. People introduce themselves within the group obviously with an account that presents a real name and then rattle off their best-known usernames. Usually the thing I don't know is the person's last name. And while I don't really participate in the group (I don't Facebook), when someone inquired about another person whose fate I knew, I answered that person directly in a DM and later in the group they said that I said XYZ about that person. They referenced me by my first name and I'm certain most people knew exactly whom she meant.
My part about using different usernames relates to the fact that most places there is no "community", or there is no interest in participating. Why do I need to use the same username everywhere? Does it matter what username I used when I signed up for Nuuvem in order to exploit regional pricing discrepancies? Does it matter what username I had for my No-IP.com account? Does it matter what username I chose for Loadout? Perhaps I wanted a username that better fit with the theme of that particular game.
I never said I don't want a handle. I have handles. Several of them. In any community in which I participate for any great length of time, I always have a handle. I was deus ex machina for a long time on Steam and thus some of my L4D2 friends still call me deus (and mispronounce it as "deuce"). A very few people know my real name and use it. My more recent friends call me fireworks. So that's my handle presently. It's been my handle for a few years. I have a handle. That it isn't my username here on SG doesn't make it any less my handle.
P.S. My username isn't misleading. If you assume that a person's username is about them, that's on you.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, for me your username does seem misleading. Because it simply has a lot of explanations I can pick from, the more there are the higher chance I wouldn't understand why you have it the first place. Anyhow, now I understand your thought about usernames, it's your right to pick the way you want. I shall call you Buddy.
Comment has been collapsed.
It might be misleading it if were "MyBrokenHeart", but since it not definitively a direct reference to myself given the choice of pronoun, it is appropriate to assume that the her is some other, not me, and that happens to be the case. Thus not misleading.
Buddy is my cousin's IRL nickname, not mine.
Comment has been collapsed.
Do you have a netbook and not notebook/laptop?
Bay Trail is a CPU built for tablets,not sure you will get any modern game to work on that.You second battle will be the ram.
Also define modern games?Do you mean like Far Cry,Just Cause...or more like Euro Truck and Cities Skylines?Or you just mean Modern as in newer games?
I did google it and by god they do call it a notebook/laptop while i could consider it a Netbook,meaning for the most part its good for using the net and so forth but not much more.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's a mix bag, but you are right. It's a netbook. When my PC died, I though that I couldn't play anything on this thing. The fact that has windows 10 screw me with older games too. So, Ziggurat and rocket league, that are relatively new works on low graphics, but Worm games and others are unplayable.
Besides the ram and CPU, my first struggle is with the lack of storage. It has 32 gb of flash memory, so I can't even update windows. I'm using a pendrive as a second unit, and I'm playing mostly from there.
Comment has been collapsed.
I never did check the storage even if it could play newer stuff decent that would be another hurdle.I tried to think of some games but you said you are an older gamer so you played a lot older games.
Bully would be a good one but since you said Windows 10 i am not sure how that would play on it.Though i think that would run on it giving it was from the ps2/xbox days.
Civ V may play on that since its not heavy graphics,Sims 3 should work on it.Other then that i can think of a lot great indie games that would work on that or should.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's better than mine. My laptop is still single core XD
Comment has been collapsed.
Ouch. Reminds me of when I tried to make a small server out of a laptop with a P4 Celeron and 256 MB RAM. It was so bad that even legacy Linux kernel ran like shit. And I didn't want to use WinXP as a 24/7 online machine… so I essentially just use it as a paperweight now. (Literally.)
Comment has been collapsed.
worst then my old pc , probably you can run indi games on it
Comment has been collapsed.
Give us the specs on the machine to get the best recommendations. Potato has a wide range of quality for a lot of people.
Comment has been collapsed.
Aaaa... this one: http://store.steampowered.com/app/15560/
I remember playing it in my potato netbook, it even runs fine in my phone.
Comment has been collapsed.
The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
NOT The Binding of Isaac 1
Comment has been collapsed.
stick to rebirth/afterbirth, The original was great but Rebirth just makes that game seem unplayable. GL on afterbirth. Got rebirth on ps4 and got the platnum god in like 200-300 hours but got tired of waiting for afterbirth so I broke down and bought on pc during a nice sale. Now to do it all over again, really looking forward to the lost runs /o
Comment has been collapsed.
Yep, I second this one, nice relaxing game and it's quite pretty.
Harvest Moon clone, but worth a play.
Comment has been collapsed.
There are plenty of new games which have low requirements. Most point & clicks and pixel art or retro games, for example. Also, check other telltale stuff (Wolf Among Us, etc). To give some examples which come to mind: Stardew Valley, Pony Island, Paper's Please, Undertale, Valiant Hearts, but there are many others.
Comment has been collapsed.
One is a pixel-graphics emotion-centric RPG, the second is so far the closest attempt to remake the original XCOM in a format that is not a commercial/console-market edition. (Not saying XCOM 2012 is bad, it's just not nearly as even an attempt to be a remake, more like a slightl homage that tries to act like as if it had some of the old elements.)
Comment has been collapsed.
Start saving now. By the time it comes out you'll be able to afford to build five good computers.
Comment has been collapsed.
When I put Linux on my old PC, it became faster and I could run more games than I could run before. You can try it = )
Hotline Miami, Hammerwatch and Torchlight 2 are examples of games that I had on my library but could not run until I put Ubuntu on it.
You can play these games too.
Comment has been collapsed.
Factorio
Stardew Valley
Enter the Gungeon
Don't Starve
Undertale
LISA
Lethal League
South Park The Stick of Truth
Audiosurf 2
Guacamelee
Not a Hero
Hotline Miami 1&2
Hyper Light Drifter
Transistor
And soooo many more awesome light games out there! =)
Comment has been collapsed.
vertical drop heroes hd. i like that game cost 0.38€ on g2a lol
http://store.steampowered.com/app/311480/
Comment has been collapsed.
85 Comments - Last post 25 seconds ago by WaxWorm
16,299 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Carenard
56 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by Carenard
1,811 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by ngoclong19
72 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by Reidor
545 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by UltraMaster
41 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by ViToos
54 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Akuburanir
119 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by Norbee001
56 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by SilentGuy
14 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by PonBaron
73 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Thedarksid3r
9 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by PonBaron
21 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by PonBaron
It's funny, but here in Argentina is more common to call a lower end machine: BATATA (sweet potato)
For various reasons, now I'm gaming on my small notebook. With the HDMI cable connected to the TV and a controller it's not so bad. It's good for couch co-op with a friend too.
But has very low specs, and I need recommendations for modern games (post 2012) that runs on low end machines.
So far I've played (mostly indie and retro style games):
SHOVEL KNIGHT
DESKTOP DUNGEONS
ZIGGURAT
ROCKET LEAGUE
BROFORCE
FREEDOM PLANET
STEAMWORLD DIG
DOWNWELL
OUTLAND
RETRO CITY RAMPAGE DX
RISK OF RAIN
SUNLESS SEA
PIX the CAT
ROGUE LEGACY
THE WALKING DEAD - A Telltale Series
TOWERFALL ASCENSION
Added:
SPELUNKY
ONE PIECE PIRATE WARRIORS 3 (I can't believe it. Works great)
SERIOUS SAM 3 (minimum)
THE WOLF AMONG US
STARDEW VALLEY
NIDHOGG
A BOY AND HIS BLOB
POKER NIGHT 2
BASTION
Any others that I can try?
Thanks for reading!
SPECS
Toshiba Satellite CL15-B1204X 11.6-Inch Laptop
-Intel Celeron N2840 “Bay Trail” Dual-Core 2.16-2.58GHz 1MB Cache (~1,100 PassMark benchmark points)
-Intel HD Integrated Graphics
-RAM 2GB
ENDED
Small thank you all Gib HERE
ENDED
Comment has been collapsed.