Just read this article and I'm honestly disappointed/shocked by Steam's no content control. But to each their own.
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2019-03-04-valve-under-fire-as-sexually-explicit-game-glorifying-rape-is-listed-on-steam

Thoughts?

5 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Allow these games on Steam?

View Results
Hell yeah FREE SPEECH
Not sure tbh, what about those killing shooting hentai games!?
NO! RAPE IS WRONG!

I only like game where I murder people, rape is bad, murder is good

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, that is quite the hot take.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sometimes, the truth is very simple.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Murder can be justified on multiple levels. How do you justify rape?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Might be different wording, but here murder is defined as planned, intended and not justified by any means, while there are also homicide, accidents and killing in self-defence for other cases.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Murdering Hitler would have been fine. Raping him would have been alright as well, I guess.^^

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The next question is if it would have changed anything.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That is a good question indeed. Probably not.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No way to know for sure but even if possible it would be a terrible idea. Just imagine that all the people that died in WW2 wouldn't have died but would've had kids instead (not to say it's good they died or anything btw). That's an insane amount of extra human beings on this planet. Technologically we probably would go back in time a few years since certain discoveries weren't made when they were. The cold war might not happen or might escalate resulting in nuclear destruction. And on and on xD Kind of interesting to think about!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Depends on the time as well. If he would have been killed at the end of the 20ies, it should have been too late, because he had already infected many with his ideology. On the other hand, if he would have been killed way earlier, there might have been another ideology with other minorities as victims and also leading to a world war, because the breeding ground (economic crisis, political quarrels due to world war I's consequences) would have existed anyway.

And if that era hadn't happen at all, we couldn't have learned from it.

Btw. if you haven't read/watch The Man in the High Castle yet, I can highly recommend it.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Now one wonders if killing the people responsible for treaty of Versailles would have been more effective use of time travelling...

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Also interesting but then what? Germany would've been free to do whatever they wanted and Hitler would still have been born with the same ideology or maybe a little less extreme. If I get a time machine someday I'll let you know :P

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Germany might have prospered and had no reason to enter war...

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Also a possibility! The right choice at one time might not be the right one a 100 years later. Then again they wouldve still been punished for WW1 (probably). I guess we can be glad we cant change the past :)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Finally someone who gets it. Wow, I'm really a bit impressed now. It's not about Hitler, it's about that treaty of Versailles.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, kill the idiot who's about to shoot Archduke Franz Ferdinand and started the whole mess to begin with.
No assassination --> No WW1 --> No Treaty of Versailles --> No WW2

Of course, that would probably open a whole new can of worms and completely change the world as we know it, but that should definitively prevent WW2.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think there was too many other reasons... Napoleon might have worked...

Then again if I ever get time machine and have to kill a single person to stop atrocities it would be Paul...

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

True, and don't forget that Hitler made a lot of bad decisions and had a bad temper (I think). If a military expert would have taken his place WW2 could've been even worse. And indeed, we've learned a lot from it and if we wouldn't remember it we would make the same mistakes over and over.

I've seen TMITHC, great show!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Except killing Hitler would probably not have prevented a war. There were plenty of other factions and men in Germany who were itching for a fight to get revenge for the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler was just the most successful.

WW2 isn't as simple as "Bad Man invaded Poland, War Declared". There are a lot of underlying factors that made such a conflict inevitable. If you want to avoid WW2, you have to solve Germany's economic crisis, revise several aspects of the Treaty of Versailles so that its not as harsh, and either bring back the Kaiser or reform the Weimar Republic's constitution so that its actually effective and can't be easily turned into a dictatorship by the chancellor.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Also true xD That's why I also responded somewhere that there is no way to know what happens when you change one thing. It was just a big mess that has gotten us to where we are now but it's interesting to think about alternate timelines!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That sounds like he isn't dead...Do you know something?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It would have been fine at the time. To my knowledge he is just as dead as Elvis. ;)

Or he hides on the dark side of the moon. I heard some things...

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well some of my countrymen said he hid himself here after he was defeated in World War 2 and died here.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ah, so that's what the Chinese are actually looking for! All makes sense now! :P

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If your first thought is of murdering Hitler and not of simply convincing him not to head down the path he did, then with regards to contemporary political matters, you probably care much more about virtue signalling and petty vengeance than working towards a true, beneficial difference.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You are aware that Hitler was alive for nearly 20 years before being exposed to racist rhetoric in Vienna, right?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You're not wrong, but please don't forget the most important part in Hitler's biography. Being a soldier in WW1.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you want to understand why Hitler happened, just read a bit about the grande guerre, the great war, otherwise known as World War One.
He and people like him were products of that fucking war.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Being horny?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not saying I condone it but if a scenario arose where every member of either gender became abstinent to sex it would be be the only way to ensure the survival of the species. People also forget we are basically animals, smart ones but still animals. In essence our goal in life is to pass on our genes. In a world before civilisation where we dont care about others feelings, (which is a hard sell with humanity since we are primates and tribal by nature) rape wouldn't be seen as a bad thing. Just a way of passing on your genes. Its the world we live in now with laws and values which tell us that its wrong.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

passing on your genes can happen with sex without rape, rape mean your genes are bad that you cant find someone to say yes for you even in animal world the most impressive males win not the loser.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

rape mean your genes are bad that you cant find someone to say yes

Well that's not entirely true. Probably just means you've got a shit personality (speaking from experience - not that I've raped anyone mind you)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

a shit personality is a part from your genes and mind.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm gonna strongly disagree on this one. Personality is created through environment, conditioning and education. Has very little, if anything, to do with genes

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

who you think make the environment and education ? are they happen by nature or group of people with good or bad minds ? and we can all have the same education or environment but our actions or success in life is not the same.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's easy to be a good person when you are surrounded with good people and having a life without much trouble.
Unless you have rich and caring parents or live in one of the most developed, rich countries; getting a good education and living in a decent environment will be considered as a privilege, not a right.
When I read biographies of serial killers like Pedro Rodrigues Filho, I wonder if it'd be possible for any human to be a good person if they had the same life...

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

https://www.babygaga.com/13-kids-with-the-worst-childhoods-turned-serial-killer/
Cherry picked lists which focus on the exceptions to the rule don't mean much. I wasn't trying to say same factors would turn anyone into a serial killer, but I believe bad childhood and terrible living environment can break most people. As I said it is easy to be a good person when the life treats you kind.
Btw your linked video is such a rare case, you see it on the news.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

watch forensic files they are not really rare alot of killers people has good environment and there is no guarantee the ones you talked about will be good in good environment. It’s true that almost all serial killers suffered childhood trauma. But here’s the problem: if 100 kids grow up in an abusive foster home, and one turns out to be a serial killer – what about the other 99? They grew up to be, well, maybe not all well-adjusted citizens, but certainly not serial killers. What is the missing X factor?
My sense is responsibility falls on the offender here. Serial killers choose to act on their compulsions.Other researchers theorise that damage to the frontal lobe, the hypothalamus and the limbic system can cause extreme aggression, loss of control, and poor judgment.
Henry Lee Lucas, a serial killer convicted of 11 murders, was found to have extreme brain damage in these regions, for example.
The brain study at the University of Wisconsin, Madison also noticed a drop in connectivity between the amygdala and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC).
These regions process negative stimuli into negative emotions and responses.
When connectivity is low, people have lower levels of empathy and aren’t easily ashamed by their actions.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 year ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say but I don't think you understand what genes are

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, no. :P

Who decides who is the most impressive male, a female or other male? A lot of species just fight it out between the males, the winner takes the female. No consent involved.

If that was true, I could walk up to a couple, beat up the boy, fuck the girl, and it wouldn't be rape. I don't think I even have to explain why that wouldn't fly.

Of course there are also species who do it differently where the male has to 'charm' the female. But if you're gonna talk about rape, you really don't want to look at the rest of the animal kingdom (except when trying to figure out where the urge comes from maybe).

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Rape has nothing to do with sex or reproduction, it's just about violence and humiliation.
Considering our species has to care for their young for quite some time, creating a consensual long-term partnership makes much more sense than just 'spreading genes' randomly.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, that's what they tell you to believe. That's how the stigma works. Rape has nothing to do with sex, my ass. How dumb can you be?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ok, I'll bite: Who are 'they'?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you mean we all murder only cause of accident? we are just hunters wich tried to hunt bambi's mom but sadly a person came between the deer and us?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How do you "justify" murder and why can't you do the same for rape?
I guess the justification for murder will be based on revenge, greed and vengeful feelings and why can't you do the same for rape? (well add lust to the list)
-to clear the possible misunderstandings: I'm talking about a human being killing another one, I don't mean killing animals for food.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's just a game. you don't have to justify anything

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Are you fucking retarded somehow? Murder can never be justified. But I guess that is the problem with people like you, who ..(I'm not gonna say anything here or use any labels or whatever, because it would only be a distraction. Those who know what I mean will understand), and ultimately all end up at the same place, the belief that the end justifies the means.

It's as if you're lacking the intellectual capacity to even understand what that means, to realize the implications of such a notion.
Because if the end justifies everything, you think that you can draw a line just where you like? Like rape, for example? Really? Can someone really be that dumb? There is at least one well-known example for this scenario, but I'm not going to get into details here. It's pretty easy to understand, and again, actually quite common.
I know, rape is the sacred crime. That is what your gods tell you. That's why the stigma exists. And people get stoned to death for it. The victims of a rape, actually, isn't that funny? And you are unable to look past that conviction, because you are afraid to commit the ultimate sin: blasphemy.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You don't need to justify whatever you do in a video game because you're not supposed to do it in real life anyway, otherwise every single game should be banned because we're always killing someone one way or another and it's never okay in real life even if it's a bad guy or an evil dog

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Unfair double standards here; why do people accept games about murder, but not rape? Hell I've read about people that did go violent (berserk crazy) after playing games w/ murder -- that is my reasoning. If one is allowed then so should the other.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's not quite that simple. Murder in itself is of course bad, but it's all about context, realism, and how it makes us feel. For instance, if a game is made in 3D realistic graphics, as opposed to let's say 2D pixel-graphics or something arcadey, it will make us relate and feel much stronger emotions (like empathy) towards the characters. We also know the NPCs are just code and don't actually feel anything, so how it makes us feel is all that matters.

In most realistic games where you're killing people it feels justified because they're the "bad guys" or the killing in itself isn't very graphic and there's not much focus/attention around their death. I can't remember any realistic game I've played where the goal is to go around and kill innocent people. That would most likely make us feel bad and therefore not enjoy the game, unless for example the game is presented in a humorous manner.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Cherry picking one game where you kill innocent people doesn't prove anything. I never said there are no games out there where you kill innocent people.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They're not innocent, they were polluting the earth with the plane they were gonna board!
Fair point though.

I do find 'innocent' quite subjective. For me, half the 'people' I've killed in games I could classify as innocent, depending on what definition I would use. Is a police officer innocent in a game where you're robbing a bank?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes, innocence can some times be subjective, but that's beside the point. If you disagree with what I've said, I'd like to know what you disagree with. By "innocent" in this regard, I was referring to characters that aren't committing a crime or causing harm onto others and that killing them is unprovoked and completely unnecessary.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Exactly.

No more questions, your honor.

ITT: Dumb people defending a ridiculous double standard.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A cherry picked video showing gameplay of murdering innocent people is all you need? Definitely no bias there.
Insulting others for not sharing your exact opinion is just arrogant. I will only speak for myself, but I was explaining why context and realism make a difference. Why don't you respond to what I've said, instead of misinterpreting my points as defending a double standard?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How is that cherry-picking? That was one successful, mainstream Triple-A title published by the big ones in the industry. The controversy ensued, a lot of complaints were heard, but ultimately the game was published, and that was the right thing to do.
You cannot defend this double standard. This is not about you, or what you like, or what you find abhorrent. It's not about me either.
Got that already in your empty head?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In No Russian what you were doing was at least portrayed as abhorrent. It was still controversial, and not allowed in all countries, but this seems to be the "general" standard, you can portray bad things in games (even rape), but it needs to be portrayed as something that is really bad. The No Russian scene is not the gun/violence counterpart to wanking material, it's designed to make you feel bad about what you're doing. The rape wanking material counterpart when it comes to guns & violence would be something like "Active shooter".

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This is such bullshit. Look at you, knowing all the reasons and motivations why people play games at all. Think you can speak for others?
Hey, really good for you Mr Smartass, that you have the holy blessing of being able to look into the head of other human beings.
You can portray whatever you want, and whatever is real. That's how we deal with reality. Time to grow up.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wow, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning, and also did not really read my post, but chose to react anyway.

You can of course portray anything in media. If that thing is going to be considered "alright" is an entirely different matter. I was not talking about why people consume the media in my post as much as I was talking about how things are portrayed. I can't say for certain that you're not getting sexually aroused by playing the "No Russian" level in CoD. But I can say with some certainty that the developers never intended you to feel sexually aroused by playing it, but wanted you to feel uncomfortable, and like your actions were bad. And I can make an educated guess that most people who played that level did not feel like great heroes, but rather closer to villain. And I can also make an educated guess that if the developers had portrayed you as being a heroic person for gunning down the civilians in "No Russian", the level would have ended up causing far more controversy. And that was my point. You can portray horrible things in media and get away with it, but if you portray these horrible things as something good, you'll usually end up getting a lot of bad press. Bad press that most companies don't want

Also, are you seriously saying that you can't say why people consume certain types of media? We can't say that people consume porn because they find it a bit arousing, that people don't play DOOM because it makes them feel like a badass and so on? Sure, there might be individuals who consume any given piece of media for different reasons, but in general? Because if that's what you say, then congratulations, you've just invalidated a lot of work done by a lot of different people. I guess companies no longer need to put any work in making sure that their media creates the intended reaction from its audience, I guess anyone who's done research in the field of media is just plain wrong. But I'm just going assume that you're not going to take the argument that far.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You have a point there. The way something looks very much alters the whole experience. It's one thing to see questionable scenes and actions occur to figures that can not be mistaken for real people. But 3D computer graphics have gone a long way and look so realistic that it can be hard to tell the difference.
When something looks and feels real, that's about where I draw my personal line.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you mean killing people in gta makes no fun? or killing the police men and starting a big fight against them with huge weapons would make us feel bad?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I didn't imply that, at all. I find that fun as well. This is what I said:
"In most realistic games where you're killing people it feels justified because they're the "bad guys" or the killing in itself isn't very graphic and there's not much focus/attention around their death".
The highlighted part being the case for GTA V. They're "disposable," just like background actors in action movies who die in masses without anyone giving a shit. The more time you spend on a character, the closer connection you feel to them, ergo the more you care about their death.

I also said this:
"I can't remember any realistic game I've played where the goal is to go around and kill innocent people."
The goal in GTA V isn't to go around and kill innocent people. That's just something that many people find funny because of the arcadey feel of the game. The more realistic it feels, the more bothered we become when we do immoral things in video games.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

what do you mean by "killing in itself isn't very graphic"? cause people getting killed in gta i would say is graphic... do you mean cutscenes for every kill?
"not much focus/attention around their death" i guess you are right in most situations. i also agree with you that you often get not much informations about the victims. the game is intended to let you feel good as you already said. but you said also its all about how we feel and the context and if we kill innocenced people while we have fun. is it nice?

you said also, they are just code and have no feelings so its just about how we feel. is a rape victim in a video game more then code? has he/she more feelings?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i would argue that rape is worse than murder, there is a different tragedy to someone having to live with the reality of their violation.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Murder is worse, it is not even comparable in my opinion. You still have a life to live after rape, the worst case you'd commit suicide and it'll turn into an indirect murder. You lose your life, it's over. There's nothing left to improve or fix when you are dead, no chance of anything better happening, it is the end for you.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

the way i see it, both are acts that take away the agency of the victim, this is the important point to be, but murder's pain is usually measured on the surroundings of the victim, they will be the ones that are aught to seek justice and what not, while rape is solely dependent on the victim, it is required from them to act and act fast, due to the nature of those crimes, pstd, trauma or whatever, if not justice will never be brought, and statistically justice is never found, there is no recovery from rape, you can learn to live with it. some people might recover, but some wont, and while there might be automatic compassion for a murdered victim, there might not be for a rape victim, mainly because they usually dont bear scars.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

it is just a game IMO. It won't make you rapist. The same GTA won't make you car thief, murderer, drug dealer, robber etc. That's just bullshit some people say to make us look bad. We gamers should know more that it ain't working that way.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

So you can judge them?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

<3

edit: you also forgot blacklisted :P

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Then blacklist me first.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

lol

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You're already on mine!

Ah shit, wrong colour :P

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeey there's the ad-hominum!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And here I was, thinking non-facts were facts!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You assume too much.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You sir made me proud of humanity.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I added them too. It is good to know that there are still people who know that rape and defending rapist is bad.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I haven't seen a single person in this thread defend rape and/or rapists though, apart from some obvious trolls.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This isn't Twitter

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sure, because there has never been a single instance throughout human history of someone changing their stance on an issue once their opinion is formed. And even if they do say they've changed their mind, they're clearly lying and still deserve to have their entire reputation and livelihood utterly destroyed beyond repair because reasons. Big fucking /s.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hmmm yeah let's start throwing mud and go full ad-hominum on each other. Surely that's gonna be a fantastic discussion.

But what would you have voted than?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You're free to disagree but don't you think saying they "deserve to be attacked" is a bit much? No one is advocating for rape in real life by supporting such games on Steam just like how people aren't advocating for murder when they support pretty much 75% of games these days that feature that on Steam.

If anything I find you advocating for violence (or Harassment depending on how you take the world "attack") far worse than anything that could happen in a game.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"If anything I find you advocating for violence (or Harassment depending on how you take the world "attack")"

Read between the brackets. Saying they "Deserve to be attacked" could be taken multiple ways the most common would be violence.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hmm, he never mentioned the word attack though. All I see is name, shame and judge.

Edit: actually nevermind, he did use it. I was looking too far up. My mistake. :P

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"The same thing I voted now. And yeah, advocates of this deserve to be attacked."

Is the comment I replied to, He clearly says "deserved to be attacked"... Attacked, i.e The past tense and past participle of attack.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And that is? Without stating which, the 'this' could refer to anything. For someone wishing to see who voted for what, you're awfully vague in your own statements,

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

We all agree on that (I hope) but as far as I can tell, the subject is a game about rape on Steam, not rape itself.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Murder is wrong too. A lot of stuff is wrong and illegal. Yet, depictions of it can be observed in all forms of media. Why video games should be something special? This isn't the argument about if it's morally ok to sell such a game (because, duh, everybody gets it), this is the argument about Steam and its policies, and no, the game doesn't break any.
As wrong as it is, I'm trying to be objective here, sorry.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I can see how a topic like rape could put some people on edge, but who the hell takes websites like Eurogamer seriously these days?

Honestly, I am much more concerned about all the viruses, cryptominers and barely wokring asset flips that Valve still welcomes with open arms rather than about games featuring a controversial topic.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Your PC has been infected just by reading this comment. Your personal files are now encrypted. Send me 1000 cinnamon buns to my home or else I won't give you the password to break the encryption. And no, the password is not "123456"!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

654321

???

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Oh no... oh no! Now I will have to rob a bakery... several of them, probably. Look what you've made me do, you shady hacker!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's possible, of course, that this particular listing may have simply slipped through the net

100% sure Valve doesn't have that content policy.

edit: "that" refers to your title

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hopefully you were right => edited the title

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

:D

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm very concerned about rape. But arguing that a game about rape leads to rape - and a visual novel at that - is just as flimsy and spurious as arguing that a game about killing people leads to murder.

I played a game called Beautiful Escape: Dungeoneer - where you play a serial killer who goes out to pick up victims to drug and leave naked in your dungeon full of traps, intending to mentally and physically break them. You strive for the "Beautiful Escape", where the victim leaves alive but so physically and mentally scarred that they're on the verge of breakdown. Failing that, you at least make sure they never leave. The subject matter is awful, and the game is disturbing, but it's actually a rather good game, and one I recommend people play.

But how do you protect this worthwhile game from a game filter? How do you decide that a game about torturing and murdering people in your dungeon as a serial killer is okay, but a visual novel about raping women during a zombie apocalypse isn't? Where do you draw the line?

Don't get me wrong, the rape game in question sounds awful, but I still don't think we should remove it. As Niel Gaiman aptly put it, "The Law is a huge blunt weapon that does not and will not make distinctions between what you find acceptable and what you don't."

And we're not even talking about what's legal here, we're talking about Steam. The same Steam that until recently allowed nudity and sex in games like The Witcher series, but banned Kindred Spirits on the Roof, an Overwhelmingly Positive visual novel about lesbian relationships that just so happens to have a bit of nudity. Any automated filter script Steam employs is going to be flawed. There are too many games for actual people to sort through and manually allow or deny, and even those people themselves could be biased and make bad calls. There's really no way to allow some adult games without allowing all adult games - even the awful, reprehensible ones that no one should buy.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's a woman thing anyway, right? And these women always exaggerate everything, right?

You're probably going to want to be more clear on if you're being sarcastic or sincere with that comment, given how often we've had nearly identical statements presented on SG with sincerity.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I would say "good old Poe", but in the end we all have to remember, this days not only we have people religiously believe "all planets are round, but Earth is gifted and flat", but also "I should be able to rape anyone I want and my victims should be grateful my genitals touched them".

In your defense, I could smell sarcasm in that line from the context of whole comment.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

free speech is everything, apparently. I'm sure it varies a lot depending on the audience and I guess SGers are mostly unconcerned by rape.

I think many people are "mostly unconcerned" because playing a game about rape and actually raping someone are two different things ;)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, I sure as hell am somewhat concerned with the posibility of someone raping me some day. I still don't mind videogames regarding the topic, though. I personally wouldn't play such a game, but I'm not offended by its existence either. Because playing a game about rape and actually raping someone are two different things.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wow, this guy really must have regretted what he wrote. Deleted everything O.o

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 3 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You should be more concerned about progressing in your alchemy studies, you haven't managed to replicate the philosopher's stone yet.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Here are my thoughts:

This game sounds and looks awful, but I still don't think we should remove it. Arguing that a game about rape - and a visual novel at that - leads to actual rape is just as flimsy and spurious as arguing that a game about shooting people leads to actual murder. I like to link to Niel Gaimen here, who writes that "If you accept -- and I do -- that freedom of speech is important, then you are going to have to defend the indefensible."

I played a game called Beautiful Escape: Dungeoneer - where you play a serial killer who goes out to pick up victims to drug and leave naked in your dungeon full of traps, intending to mentally and physically break them. You strive for the "Beautiful Escape", where the victim leaves alive but so physically and mentally scarred that they're on the verge of breakdown. Failing that, you at least make sure they never leave. The subject matter is awful, and the game is disturbing, but it's actually a rather good game, and one I recommend people play.

But how do you protect this worthwhile game from a game filter? How do you decide that a game about torturing and murdering people in your dungeon as a serial killer is okay, but a visual novel about raping women during a zombie apocalypse isn't? Where do you draw the line?

We're talking about Steam here, the same Steam that until recently allowed nudity and sex in games like The Witcher series, but banned Kindred Spirits on the Roof - an Overwhelmingly Positive visual novel about lesbian relationships that just so happens to have a bit of nudity.

Any automated filter script Steam employs is going to be flawed. There are too many games for actual people to sort through and manually allow or deny, and even those people themselves could be biased and make bad calls. There's really no way to allow some adult games without allowing all adult games - even the awful, reprehensible ones that no one should buy. I'd rather Steam allow all games, and the consumers speak with their dollars.

So you want to boycott this terrible game, I'm right there with you. But wanting to ban it from Steam? That I can't get behind.

Also, your poll is rather loaded. Must we either pick that "free speech is good" or that "rape is wrong"? Why not both? I am certainly pro free speech and anti-rape. But, just like the spurious "first person shooters lead to murder argument", I don't believe that games about rape lead to actual rape.

I mean, surely you would agree with me that murder is wrong? But following your argument, we should then set up a content filter to block out all the games about murder. Goodbye Assassin's Creed, Bioshock, Mass Effect, Dragon Age, Hitman, Far Cry, etc.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Even if you make it a bit less 'bland' as murder, but take something like torture. Can scrape quite a few games off Steam for that alone. BioShock, Hitman from that list definitely fall under that category, probably most of them, but can´t recall for all of them at the top of my head. Just like pretty much any game where you have to 'interrogate' someone. Classics like Manhunt and The Punisher are purely that.

Bit of a double morale in my opinion if you're in favour of allowing that to be on Steam, but something about rape is bad hmmkay and should be kept off it.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

First recent game regarding torture coming up for me is GTA V. But the "Hot Coffee Mod" in GTA SA was the bigger scandal.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I could spend an hour writing my own post, but it would come off as plagiarism of you, @Timobkg. Stupid, poor taste, possibly troll game, but should it banned? No. Ditto, Amen, God save the Queen, etc.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 10 months ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Rape is good.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Lol people like me are the problem. Let's kill em all...or at least rape them?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nah not really. I don't think these games are fine, but I don't actually want to remove them, cause I don't really care. I am here for the lulz, and this thread delivers.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Controlling content is a very slippery slope that will end up destroying our artistic freedoms. You may agree with banning certain things now and that may sound acceptable to you at first, but then other people will want to ban things that you may feel are acceptable. If we try to live in a society where you cannot offend anyone, we will end up like the movie Equilibrium.

It may start with banning the use of rape in a certain way in games, but then other people will complain about including rape in any way is bad because they have experienced it in the past, so they want all forms of rape in games banned. Then you may have a serious game that is made by a female to show how horrible rape is and how it affects people lives, but she can't get her game on Steam because Steam has a blanket policy than bans rape.

Then people will attack suicide and say that we shouldn't allow it in games because some comedic game went viral with Youtubers where the objective is to kill yourself and the suicide rate is going up. Then serious games like The Cat Lady will not be allowed on Steam even though it is a serious game and talks about suicide in a serious way.

Then there are the people that want to ban violent games because there are too many school shootings. It starts with banning games like Hatred because that seems reasonable to some, but then quickly turns into banning games like GTA or anything else where you are allowed to kill people and this causes a massive problem because all kinds of contents starts to get banned.

Then they ban torture. Then they ban drug content. Then they start banning games where you commit crimes like robbing banks or stealing cars. It may sound crazy now, but if you allow the process to start, it will happen. I am also not just talking about video games, this applies to everything, including movies. Do you think all torture or rape scenes should be banned from movies as well?

Steam should simply require devs or publishers to display content warnings for certain types of controversial content and then let the consumer decide what they want to experience. I don't need someone filtering content for me, I can make my own choices. Just like the porn games that are now allowed on Steam, if you don't like them, simply don't play them. The only thing Steam should actively block is real child porn because it is illegal.

If you haven't, you may want to check out some movies and books like 1984, Fahrenheit 451, Equilibrium, or others that are similar. More and more rights and freedoms are being taken away and our modern society is quickly turning into a dystopian nanny state where nobody is allowed to think for themselves or make their own decisions.

Edit: I would recommend the 1984 movie, I found the book to be kind of boring and dragged out. The Fahrenheit 451 book is much better than the movie and it's fairly short.

Edit 2: Steam has explained their reason for not allowing the game on their platform and I want to say that I don't have a problem with their decision. They are a private company and can choose not to sell any game they want for any reason and that is fine. I am against making a blanket policy that bans a certain type of content.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Exactly this. Try getting out of your own point of view and look at it from a distance.

It's like how (generalisations incoming) Western people despise dogs being slaughtered for food. Ok, let's ban that. Well, then we ban eating beef too, Hindu's don't like that. Then pork is haram and not kosher, only need to find some people against eating chickens and goat and sheep and we're set for everyone being a mandatory vegetarian.

Projecting your own norms on a complete general population doesn't quite work well, I thought 'we' (yeah I know there's no such thing) as gamers of all people should know that, given how often games have gotten slack.

Edit: removed my comments below as without the other comments there's not much point to them.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

most people will never be in a situation where they can murder someone

What? What kind of logic is that? There are murders every single day in every single country of the world. Normal people have almost an unlimited amount of situations to murder people. You can push someone in front of a train or truck, off a ledge, stab, shoot, strangle, poison, hit with a heavy rock or hammer.

Edit: I was just trying to find out what percent of murders are done by spouses to rule out gang killing and criminals. There was a study done by the FBI in 1995 that says that out of all the females murdered in the US in 1995 (3752), 26 percent were killed by their husband or boyfriend. These are everyday normal people and are killing eachother on a regular basis, so there are clearly plenty of situations available for murdering someone.

I found a more recent article that talks about a study that looked at all females murdered from 2003-2014 and the number murdered by current or previous husbands or boyfriends was 55%. It shows that a large percent of murders are committed by normal people and it is not rare.

Also, if you are in a situation to rape someone, how is that not also a situation where you could murder that same person? If you can rape someone, you could just as easily strangle them.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What about torture, slaughtering random innocent people in the streets, robbing banks, suicide, selling drugs? There are plenty of games that include these type of things. Do people think these things are normal and that is why we accept them in our games and movies?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

We happily murder digital people because we're always on the "right" side in those games. (e.g., to defend the Earth against Aliens, to prevent genocides from extremist regimes, to save the princess from her captor, to take revenge on the murderers of your family, etc.).

Ridding the world of a bad actor shouldn't be seen as doing something morally wrong. However, raping an innocent woman bystander; stalking and chasing after her no less, how is that equivalent?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But are we on the 'right' side there, or just on 'our' side?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"Our" side is always "right" for almost every human

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Unfortunately I have to agree with the last part of your sentence, although I definitely don't agree with the first part in itself.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's kind sad that which viewpoint is "Our" is very limited in gaming currently...

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Good point although I remember one of the Call of Duty was more than a bit controversial because you are undercover in a terrorist group and a mission literally has you happily slaughtering innocent people in an airport to protect your cover.

It did raise issues with a lot of people though, which Rape Day doesn't seem to be doing much.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It did raise issues with a lot of people though, which Rape Day doesn't seem to be doing much.

I think it's fair to say that's because Call of Duty games have a much larger audience (and many more younger players) than some random indie game.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's why this mission was so unique, because the morality of killing those people was ambiguous. In almost every other game, there's never any ambiguity, you see a bad guy, you kill him because he's "bad" and your character is "good".

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Another good point. It raised the issue. Didn't just use it for entertainment, or worse, for selling games to psychopaths.

Games where you play an outright "bad" guy usually are played for comical effect, and there are games using violence but raising issue like Spec Ops: The Line

I read today about a new game on Steam called "The Executioner". I don't know if it's good or bad or if it's graphic but unlike "Rape Day", it asks you to take a certain position on the violence of the game.
I think that's my main concern about Rape Day. It's just treating rape as a fun hobby.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Exactly. There are games (and books and movies) about serious topics, be it rape or murder, but for different target audiences.

The "Rape Day" is a pornographic game with rape and zombie fetishes. And it's just one such game of many.

The Executioner seems to be exploring the subject of a difficult "career" in a mature way, like Spec Ops did. (e.g., "moral decision-making", "unsettling atmosphere", "world filled with moral ambiguity"). This game will make the player uncomfortable with their own decision, make them think, make them regret, but it will probably not provide a violent scene without a good reason.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why remove half you comments? Were one of the few with nuance.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because freedom of speech being the main issue here, I don't feel like making myself a target for the trolls around the board.

I do regret having to leave a good debate with civil posters who disagree with me but there are too many people around here not taking their medications.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Too bad. Well, I like having debates with people I disagree with in a civil manner. Earned yourself a spot on my wl for that for what it's worth. Which is not much to be honest as I don't often do (wl) giveaways. :P

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I know but now I've gone and triggered someone and even deleting my post make him even angrier.
Oh boy. Why do I keep trying to debate online?
And the best part is I'm sure they voted "hell yeah free speech" as long as it's agreeing with what they think, they're all for free speech.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's fun? :P As long as people don't take it too personally that is.

as long as it's agreeing with what they think, they're all for free speech

It always is...

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Eh, while I definitely have very strong feelings about topics such as rape, I also have very strong feelings about topics like suicide, murder, drug use, etc, and I don't believe any of those should be banned from video games.

So, while I certainly feel strongly about certain subjects, I like the idea of censorship even less. If anything, as more and more topics creep into video games, I'd expect better age checks and warnings before purchasing. Additionally, Steam provides a venue for expressing (maturely) any valid concerns about particular games and their topics, either via the game's forums or via the community forums (edit: and if you feel strongly enough, you can report the game directly).

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If anything, as more and more topics creep into video games, I'd expect better age checks and warnings before purchasing.

Exactly. There should be some kind of filter/protection system, regardless of the main topic here.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You mean you weren't born January 1st?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Haha! Close but no.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A couple points that have been ignored and most likely will continue to be but I feel compelled to mention anyway any time a topic like this comes up:

  • Whether a distributor of goods decides to sell a given product or not has nothing to do with "free speech", which is entirely about the power of law/government to regulate speech. If it is a suppression of free speech for a retailer to not sell a product, then that is something literally every retailer on the planet is guilty of, since nobody sells literally everything.
  • Something has not been "banned" if a distributor of goods does not sell it. If Wal-Mart doesn't sell something, it hasn't been banned. If the law/government says Wal-Mart cannot sell it, it has (probably) been banned.
  • Criticizing something or broadcasting one's dislike of it is, itself, free speech.

Bearing that in mind, carry on. Or ignoring it completely. Whatever. My compulsion to point these things out is satisfied.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Whether a distributor of goods decides to sell a given product or not has nothing to do with "free speech", which is entirely about the power of law/government to regulate speech.
Something has not been "banned" if a distributor of goods does not sell it. If Wal-Mart doesn't sell something, it hasn't been banned. If the law/government says Wal-Mart cannot sell it, it has (probably) been banned.

Thank you. Let's not act as if Steam was the only place people can buy games. "Publishers" like this one can easily set up their own online store for anyone who like to play games about raping lingerie-clad little girls or whatever. Now I need a shower just for writing that.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You're right of course.
There is a difference between censorship and free speech, which is why Hollywood exercised a self imposed code for so many years as being far preferable to government regulation stepping in. Steam could also practice a little judgement in this regard without threatening anyone's right to free speech.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't believe the bullshit line that only governments can censor. Private corporations and individuals are doing it already.

And free speech should be absolute. If people don't like content they are free not to pay for it or listen to it. But on other hand private companies after certain threshold should be force to host it in current online world.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And then be sued? Valve literally said in their announcement about the game that whilst they don't wish to block any content, this game was likely to result in at least one lawsuit, so they refused to host it.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thanks especially for the first item.
I agree to your "banned" item as well, but representatives of Valve used the term itself in the past, so everyone adopted it. There's also a technical difference being Valve's "removed" and "banned" from store (latter ones don't show up in game lists anymore, achievements aren't shown anymore, trading cards become unmarketable).

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Good point. If Valve has its own internal "banned" term, then you could legitimately use it if the game were subject to that. I was not aware they had a specific category for that vs. just removing a game. Thank you!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Good points. I also find it really annoying when people scream free speech when content distributors choose to not allow certain things on their platform. That's not to say the creators of that content can't put it out somewhere else, it's just that those distributors don't like the image it conveys to potential users. It's why they don't put hardcore pornography on Netflix. Especially when it's a platform children may use, a lot of countries actually have legal restrictions on the content that can appear. So crying 'free speech' is a bit stupid.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I believe that after a platform reaches certain market penetration it should lose it's right to choose content on it. It should allow any and all content.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well one day when you become supreme dictator of earth, I'm sure you'll be allowed to make that rule.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Free speech online is a bit of a tricky one that doesn't really compare that well to the offline world.

In the offline world, any private party can deny you free speech, but there's also plenty of non-private places where you can say whatever you want or sell whatever you want (as long as you don't break any laws with it of course) that no one else wants to give you a platform to.

In the online world however, you are gonna have to deal with private parties one way or the other, as there is no non-private spaces and there is no way to create a place that is completely unreliant on non-private parties.

So yes, you can argue, noone has to 'host' your free speech online, just like noone has to in the offline world, but there also isn't really an alternative to it online.
Although I don't really have a formed opinion on the whole 'free speech online' thing, I think it is something to consider, and I can see where Ekaros is coming from.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But there are alternatives. There's nothing to stop you making your own 'rapegame' website and selling all the rape games you can find. You could have it up and running in half a day. Yes, no one will visit it until you've marketed it, but to say there's no alternatives as a justification for why any big company 'must' allow something is just wrong. If it's something people want they'll find it.

And hey, I'm sure the Epic store would welcome such a quality game. :-D

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Lol @ Epic store bash.

And where are you gonna host it, your own datacenter? Where are you gonna get the connection from? Payment provider? You can't set that all up yourself without involving a single other party.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hey you can host a website off your own computer if you really want? Take direct deposits into your account, or with a money transfer? I get what you're saying, but there's tons of outright illegal stuff on the internet that somehow survives, so I think a game that might not be illegal everywhere would be able to find someone to host them. And they've got lots of free marketing out of this.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes it might be possible, although I think it is close to impossible if it is. Most illegal stuff can operate by the hoster (for example) not actually knowing what is hosted, or the fact there is something hosted at all.

Payment would have to be bitcoin I guess to be completely independent (a bank is also a party).

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah I think most people won't criticise a hosting provider or bank for dealing with something a bit seedy. Especially as they aren't the ones actively selling it.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hey if I'm gonna make a site rapedayisokay.whatever (please, no one actually do that) and I provide a payment option from a payment provider or through a direct payment to a bank account 12345 from bank ABC. Then if some journalist is gonna make an article about it and calls out the bank for doing business with me, it's not a far stretch to imagine they would stop doing business with me. Somewhat similar to the 'adpocalypse' on youtube.

But it's more a spill of thoughts at this point than debating. :D

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But any non-private places will be subject to local laws and decency regulations.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Local laws always apply, whether it's off- or online. But I can go stand on a sidewalk and say whatever I want, as long as I don't break those laws, but there is no 'sidewalk' online.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Should we accept games with other crimes as well and ban them? Or should we play them all freely? Let's define it first for ourselves

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This "game" is made with poser and renpy. I don't think it will have good quality.
Maybe the name is just a shitty way to shock people and advertise the game.

If someone want this kind of kink, fap-nation has a lot of them, free.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Comparing a game specifically about raping women with games that contain violence with less particular targets isn't fair or appropriate. Are men being raped in this game? Doesn't appear so, even though that would be equally likely in the game's proposed scenario. And that is precisely why the game is exploitative and promotes misogyny.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What if the women raped, actually identify themselves as men?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1 Why is it only women who get raped, are men not a choice as well? For all fairness both genders should be included victims and perpetrators.

Although I would still say a game shouldn't glorify rape for fun, people are easily influenced, take a look at social media. I'm fine if it's possible in a game, that's your choice as a player, but there should be another central point than just that.

Side note, even JAPAN has banned rape games, and you know how kinky Japanese things can get.

5 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I added the game to the ignore list to never see it again.

I know that for many "it is only a game" but I helped the rape victims so for me this is not just a game.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That must be tough. =/
I hope they will get better. That's a scar for life.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What do you mean by 'I helped the rape victims' ? You have helped actual rape victims before, or by ignoring the game you just helped the rape victims?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Before.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Gotcha. It sounded to me like the latter, so I was ready with a 'Look at me I am helping meme' but I guess I'll have to wait for better opportunity. :)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

and the family from murdered People? do you ignore gta as well?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Basic logic should help you with that.

Also I don't play in GTA.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Basic logic says: you will not kill People ingame cause you also dont rape them cause somebody might Not feel good about your crime. so i'm glad you are an peacefull gamer.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

To each their own. While I wouldn't play a game that's based on the sole concept of raping, I'm not going to condemn it either.
I mean, there's already the popular Yandere Simulator with the purpose of getting rid of girls in creative ways.
Adding rape to the repertoire doesn't seem that ground-breaking.

Taken by itself, rape has been present in some animes and most hentais, as well as a few games. Even though from the later I only know the visual novel "Gloria" (aka GLO-RI-A) from 1996 which gives you the option to rape within the first few minutes.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't like it personally, but I also don't have a problem with murder in games, so my position is inconsistent. Which is actually more interesting to me.

It would be an interesting social experiment to come up with a list of topics we feel uncomfortable with in video games, such as rape. I'm also curious why I feel bad about a game centered around rape to exist, but I don't feel bad about murder existing in gaming, when both are terrible.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Probably because people die and get raped every day, but the number of the ones that die, greatly exceeds the ones that get raped, so it is just statistics. If you live in Saudi Arabia, you probably will be ok with both:)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If I understood you correctly, what your saying is since murder is statistically higher than rape, we are more exposed to it and have become desensitized.

That just makes me sad

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There are way more rapes than homicides worldwide. And that's just the reported cases.

I don't think games necessarily desensitize us to death. Unless there's something very wrong to start with, a gamer who sees someone actually killed in front of them will react like any other person would.

When you kill someone in a game, it's a bunch of pixel. Nobody dies. There are all kinds of people playing violent games for various reasons but most, I think, won't play for the sole purpose of killing. It's part of the deal, in a survival situation or to save the day, accomplish a mission, whatever. Unless of course, there's something really wrong with them like I said before.

Playing a game where the sole object of the game is raping women (I'm assuming, for some reason that the player cannot choose to rape men in the game, and I doubt I am wrong), feels sick in a deeper way. It's living out a fantasy of hurting women. And people ask what's wrong with that if nobody gets hurt... nobody gets hurt yet.

Makes me sad too. And the reaction of some people make me even sadder.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What about in the context of hatred. It's a game where the only purpose is to kill others. iirc, this game received similar pushback that Rape Day did. Are you saying the only reason we respond to these type of games negatively is because it sheds light on deeper underlying issues that the ones who are playing them has, i.e. hatred towards women/mankind?

I'm curious on what the initial feedback to GTA when it was first released in the 90's. I'm a little too young to be a part of that conversation. I wonder if the ole' timers felt the same way towards those type games back then as we feel towards rape day/hatred now. I wonder if that was the reason the theory was put forth that violent video games caused violence in children. D:

We are becoming our parents!! D:

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

we're so lucky to have you here around, Fyanta.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This is interesting stuff man! I want to know how the brain works!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Seconded.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What about in the context of hatred. It's a game where the only purpose is to kill others

Good point. It's the same thing, imo.

Are you saying the only reason we respond to these type of games negatively is because it sheds light on deeper underlying issues that the ones who are playing them has, i.e. hatred towards women/mankind?

That's certainly a perspective worth exploring. It's not a blanket deal where every game/movie that's violent is necessarily troubling or worth outrage (although I guess that says a lot about us as a society that we got used to our daily dose of violence) but retreating behind "freedom of speech" to avoid having to look at what we're letting happen as a society is a cop-out.
Should the game be banned? I don't know. But the discussion should exist. And Steam should welcome it, not ignore it.

I'm curious on what the initial feedback to GTA when it was first released in the 90's.

The blowback was massive. Ironically the media fed on the controversy like they are now feeding on Hollywood sex scandals: shamelessly and hypocritically. As if they were not part of the problem.

We are becoming our parents!! D:

That's not a reassuring statement lol but the way things are progressing, our kids will debate the controversy of snuff movies being made available on steam or Netflix :P

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

edit: sorry that reply was meant for the other poster

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I know a famous theRAPIST.

But this is true, violence is often seen as a tool, to regulate the life of people, something common, with time is seen as something normal. All forms of culture have represented violence, because of that, has becoming something common, rape in other hand is seeing as taboo, with much more less representation. And this comes also from historical mixing invaders with defeated and so on.

Pop culture including many kinds of historical and recorded violence against another human being and dragons: Game of Thrones (Genre: Fantasy, Drama)

View attached image.
5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think for me it's the context. I would feel very uncomfortable playing a game with fleshed out characters where my goal was to murder them in horrible ways. Like if in the story I was a loving husband and family man secretly plotting to murder my whole family in nasty ways. I would feel the same way about a game like that as I do about a game about rape. I have even avoided playing the likes of manhunt, just because the violence is so gratuitous. I don't normally know the personal history of all the NPCs I mow down in a shooter game, or connect with them in any meaningful way, so it's easy to disconnect and see them as nothing more than the digital code they are living in my computer.

Rape on the other hand, is a very personal crime and especially in the context of a visual novel, the victim will probably have some kind of personality, so the act has much more weight behind it. And it's also a crime, where there's never a situation that the receiver deserved it in some way, making it impossible to justify. Whereas, in a game like hitman, the murder is easy to justify, because the targets are usually horrible people.

Now if, God forbid, rape was ever turned into a standard game mechanic, and you just ran around raping and being raped, it would probably also reach the point of not being a big deal. But I guess we may have already reached that point with genital jousting?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You bring up a good point about the family murder game. If someone created a torture simulator, I think it would fall into that type of category as well. It might just boil down to the purpose of the game.

I would love to see the feedback of society if Rockstar introduced an ability to rape in GTA. We're already able to run around and blow people up with tanks. It's normalized. I wonder if we will ever see a day where a rape mechanic is introduced into a AAA title.

We couldn't argue that it would promote violence against women, without going back to the "violent video games causes children to be violent" argument. I can, for the first time in my life, understand where my parents we're coming from when I was playing San Andreas as a kid. Running around eating hamburgers, getting fat, participating in gang wars and killing people randomly on the street. They felt towards GTA the same way we feel towards rape day. We've come full circle.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

To be honest, GTA is still a little bit south of where I feel comfortable. I mean you can spend most of the game running around and just having fun but then they throw something like the Trevor torture scene into the mix and it makes me not so keen to play. There's plenty of other games out there. It's still all about the context of the violence for me. It's the same with movies. A war movie can seem almost heroic, but I could never sit through a movie where people are gratuitously tortured. Which is why it's annoying when video games get the blame. There's plenty of far more violent movies out there than video games which portray scenes of far more realistic violence and gore.

But yeah, I still don't think there's a context where rape could ever be justifiable, and that makes it way out of bounds with what I would feel comfortable with. I don't think the game should be on Steam, but if they can at least give me functional filters so I never have to see it, then whatever, people who think rape is a great game mechanic will just find somewhere else to go.

Unluckily for my kids, I am far more in touch with what content is in games, so they'd never get away with playing a game I hadn't first played myself and vetted. On the plus side they'll also be exposed to less bad quality games. "You can't play this game!", "Why not daddy?", "Because it's trash, play this instead"

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A war movie can seem almost heroic, but I could never sit through a movie where people are gratuitously tortured.

Forgive me if I'm getting you wrong, but isn't it actually pretty much worse if you consider it almost heroic than when you know you (or the protagonist) is supposed to be 'bad'?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sorry, what? So because we know the main character is supposed to be bad we must accept that torture gore is better to watch than a war movie? Yeah no thanks.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Point being, you will never consider a protagonist doing torture/gore (almost) heroic, because you know what they're doing is wrong. But if you consider the protagonist in a war movie (almost) heroic, you don't. But they're still killing people right?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well yes, of course I won't consider them heroic. I won't even watch that kind of movie in the first place, because it makes me sick to my stomach and I think it's nothing more than torture porn a lot of the time. That was not my point. And no, not all killing and violence is equal, just ask your government. They give medals to soldiers, they put torturers in jail, not matter how much their victims may have 'deserved it'. (Especially those slutty girls, they deserve it the most, amiright? /s )

And yeah, I'm not entirely convinced people don't treat the perpetrators of torture in these movies as heroes. Which is a bit disturbing to me, but hey.

Fyantastic was questioning the psychology of why violence is more acceptable and I was trying to explain how the emotional detachment of a thousand AI drones, and the motivations of the protagonists make it seem justifiable. Of course everyone has a line of what's acceptable in this regard, but it's a long scale in video games starting with mario jumping on the heads of goombas and ending with the likes of Hatred and manhunt. I have a line, and I don't play games that are beyond that line. Rape on the other hand, there's not really a scale. There's pretty much always a victim, and an aggressor. No amount of motivating will make it more palatable.

One of my favourite games is Spec ops the line, because of how it makes you question the violence. I felt deeply uncomfortable by the end of that, and it's purely because of how they told the story. It's a good example of how much of the violence justification comes from the story and how when they strip that away, it can leave you a bit rattled.

Anyway, I wasn't really looking for a debate, particularly not on what's heroic or not, as that was not my point. I need to stop expounding on my comments, as people always seem to pick up on side comments to start off tangent arguments. :-)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Let's not bring governments pov into this. They have the 'benefit' of deciding what is wrong and right by the laws they themselves make and as a result, well, the 'as long as it doesn't break the law' doesn't really apply to them to that extent. Corporal punishment is still a thing in some countries so no, they don't always put them in jail, it can be the jailers who are the torturers.

I think there's always a line, even with rape. Some countries have laws that require both parties to verbally give their consent, by law, that means that if a women strips of her clothes, starts moving very tempting, waits for the man (let's keep it at man vs woman for simplicities sake) to undress, starts rubbing herself in front of his hard dick, he would rape her by moving his hips 5cm forward...Of course this is a bit of an exaggerated example.
Unfortunately for many rape victims, they often find themselves at the other side of the line as the people they are reporting to/in their vicinity.

But hey, you said you didn't want a debate, so I guess I'll keep my mouth shut now about the subject. Which is getting quite offtopic anyway.

Spec Ops: The Line, meh, I actually found it a pretty shitty game to be honest. :P Probably because I learned to look through the BS stories in games (well, shooters especially) where you're always portrayed as some kind of half superhero who saves the day from some crazy Ivans, or dwell some terrorist plot from some mid-east maniacs trying to destroy the western world or.... You get the drift... They're fun, but nonsense. Spec Ops: The Line really didn't deliver much more in that regard for me especially since the game itself wasn't really all that good in my opinion. Game wise I mean, not storyline.
For me it's like drinking bottles of cola (maybe a bit of a weird analogy but don't know how else to explain), and then someone says hey this cola is healthy! While all it really has is one tea spoon less sugar than the regular one, and a bit worse taste on top of it. I'd rather drink the 'regular' cola, knowing full well it has a boat load of sugar. No offence intended to you or anyone else that likes Spec Ops: The line. :)
What I'm trying to say I guess is the dubious morality is a given for me, so a game will have to be a lot better in that regard for me to appreciate it in that regard.

Now This War of Mine, that's a different story, I actually had to quit the game as I couldn't stand not being able to keep all my guys. :P But I'm trying to play that again soon, incentivised by a thread here about playing your wins from SG, let's see if I can get further this time around. ^^

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

For me the simplest way for me to understand why I personally can handle violence in video games but not rape, is to look at myself. Could I ever imagine myself killing someone? Honestly, if the situation arose and someone attacked me or my family. I would probably take action that may result in the attackers death and I would be willing to live with the consequences if it meant I had protected them. And if my government drafted me and said I need to fight, and as a result of that I kill someone who is trying to kill me, it would be horrible, but it was self-preservation ultimately. But on the other hand, there's not one situation I would be able to justify forcing someone into having sex with me. Similarly, I don't like torture because I could never imagine a scenario, where I myself would do that to someone.

So yeah, I think it is a personal thing, but in going back to Fyan's original question, this is the kind of psychology of how we allow one seemingly terrible thing, but not another.

And yeah I will agree totally that specs ops is a 'bad game' as far as shooter mechanics go. But that game and Far Cry 2 both subverted my expectations and so they stand out in the crowd of hundreds of other shooters I've played in my life. But both are not great shooter games.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hmm, somewhat ironically maybe (well, not quite, but I given some of the reactions here some might consider it ironical), I most likely see myself capable of murdering someone (not just killing, but pre-meditated killing) if they raped my daughter.

From an 'objective' standpoint, I don't see death as an appropriate punishment for a rapist, but I do see myself very capable of not caring about that at that point.

I never finished FC2, and I already had my hands on FC3 pretty close after, so just played that instead. Did it have some mindfuck-ish ending?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah Look, as a father to new baby girl, I hope there never comes a day when I have to think about that, because honestly I can't say what I'd do at that point.

And no FC2 didn't really have a twist ending or anything, it was just that you realise the situation was all pretty pointless. And it's certainly a much more realistic depiction of a civil war than a lot of other games. You are not a hero, just another drone in a war that no one will care about.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Murder, is at the end of the day, ends up with someone dying. And for other reasons (accidents, diseases, age) death is more or less part of our daily life, and of our life in general. (What lives, one day will die.) Also if someone dies, usually a few close people grieve them, and through them, we also get to know grief - I think first on our parent's side, when telling the family how an acquaintance of theirs died, or sometimes through classmates', friends' stories. Important part is that regardless of murder, accident, sickness or natural death, we very, very rarely see death eye to eye, usually just through people close to the passed.

With rape, it's an entirely different ordeal. The victim survives (don't quote on me numbers and percentages, just general idea) sometimes with various physical wounds too, but as far as I know, almost always emotionally scarred and impacted. And as someone said here before, rape is a huge taboo in western countries. Not in the turn a blind eye way, but protection for ourselves and for the victim, too - even if that is not always good. We don't know how it is. We don't know what the victim felt / feels. We decide that they need to stand up step up against rape, or we decide that they were harmed so we should act like nothing happened even if they would want to talk about it.

Also the stigma of being a rape victim usually stirs some of the reactions, depending on culture and individual "bystander": the victim is defiled and impure, was asking for it, they are being forever pampered and pitied even if they want to move on, they are "the person who got raped" and solely treated as one. And then not to mention how it can affect their future life - being afraid to be out alone at night, nightmares, distrust towards men (even to the point of not being able to create/maintain a romantic relationship) - that alone can be a problem, not to mention if their environment starts speculating about these present or not present things, and try to give them space, ending up alienating the victim from themselves, while kind of trying to help.

All in all, it's a very confusing and hard topic because lack of our experience, the complicated nature of the act and consequences, and how we, as a person and a society expect them to behave, try to help, or what we do about it.
Also, at least game-wise killing something is the archetype of being stronger than something/getting stronger, and the simplest mechanic for most of the games in progress, getting items or protecting your life (warfare is as old as humanity). This sounds very wrong, but rape has no redeeming aspect of any kind, it's completely self-serving.

This is interesting stuff man! I want to know how the brain works!

I had a fantastic lecture last year about how taboos work and why they exist in society, I really recommend you looking into this topic, there will be more and better explanation of various aspects of it than I could tell in this already too long comment :)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

better have a good reason to include, if it is for shock value, then fuck off.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Men are trash.
I said what I said.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

People in general are trash.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And with that comment you just further proved my point.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Right back at you.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I personally would get rid of all of them...

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I was not aware that trash has a gender.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Did you just assume its identity? Shame on you!!! :)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Legally he is a man

Lauren Southern

View attached image.
5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

View attached image.
5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Edit: never mind. Pointless discussion.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You're angry? I hadn't noticed. I thought that was your default position.

And again, no I wasn't supporting the original statement. Just scrolling through the thread and finding your post disturbing.
I don't see what it has to do with my integrity or me being hateful since I do not say anything in support of the poster's claim but sure, whatever makes your hatred easier to sleep with.

Thanks for calling me a scumbag just for refusing to engage on your venom contest though. I wear insults from people like you as a badge of honor.

By the way, speaking of sexism. Read your rant again and ask yourself: would you say all this shit about a man. You are making an awful lot of assumptions about women there. Not surprisingly.

And that's why I edited my post. I was trying not to poke the angry troll. My bad.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Oh brother. Please go and find another target. Have a nice life.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think if you're getting angry about an online discussion, maybe you should get offline for a bit.

I was arguing/debating with him before, wasn't a case of wanting to 'win'.

Besides, you do realise your rant comment is in reply to basically a one liner?

Take a chill pill man.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, let's look at this way, if what all you said is true, you're not gonna accomplish anything with it, except for antagonizing the person.

But if someone just posts a one-liner, it's really hard to judge how serious someone is to begin with on the internet. So maybe it's just wasted energy to write a whole story in a reply. :)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In the interests of full disclosure, I don't know a single woman who hasn't made this statement at one time or another - though usually to another woman. It really doesn't necessarily imply all the things you have assumed in your post. It's usually just knee jerk reaction to a particularly egregious misogynistic trigger. This game certainly qualifies for that.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The fact that you've had time / took the time to write this whole "analysis" of a complete stranger kinda really says it all, doesn't it? Also yeah no, you couldn't be more wrong but nice try and thanks for playing :)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Whoa. I sure hope that this gigantic wall of text is some kind of copypasta meme.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I said "gigantic" because I certainly wouldn't have typed 600 words if I just wanted to say "you are a terrible person".

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Right, but why write that at all if it's - in your words - just extra text? Really don't get what your point here is. Just to annoy me?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nah it really didn't because you were just so far off. I'm just trying to understand why you felt it was necessary to write that rant when it had nothing to do with anything, really, so the first thing that came to mind was annoyance because I didn't really see a reason at all. Also, I'm in a great enough place mentally to not let stuff like that interfere with how I'm feeling. If anything, I was confused because it came just out of the blue.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 10 months ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Women probably are like the garbage bins, I dunno; take this simile however you like. :D

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If men are that the others are racoons?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 10 months ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Recorded assault?

View attached image.
5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

When I read stuff like this, I feel pretty ok that 90% of my SG activity nowadays comes from solving support tickets.
I hope you never have children (as long as you have that mindset)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As long as I have to read comments like "rape is good" (as seen above) as a "joke" or not, and no one saying anything about / to that person, I believe that yes, most men are trash. And if you can't see what's wrong with that, I'm sorry.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You tickle my funny bone. I greet you with this song:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QELMbWN_3Z0

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm sorry you feel that way, Elunes. I hope you get better people in your life.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Actually the people in my life are pretty alright for the most part, it's the online peeps that I just can't get on the same page with / that are aggravating me. Anyway, even though I'm not entirely sure if this was sincere or not I'm just gonna say thank you regardless.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Anger is contagious, you managed to trigger other people as well. I just had a quick look at this thread and decided to get the fuck out of here.
Glad to hear everything's well in real life, trolls and random internet strangers' opinions are not really worth your time.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You perfectly summed it up for me - I noticed the anger in this topic and decided to stay away. (with this one exception of course).

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I should've done that. Hindsight is 20/20. Oh well.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Next time you know better. ;) Don't let it drag you down now. :)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you :)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, in hindsight I too should've done that. You're definitely right, it would be a waste of time.

Sorry btw, my first thought was you being sincere but then doubts crept in because of this whole chaos here.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

not disagreeing but i can introduce you to some girls that will change your opinion or atlest even it out.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

like the dev said. "You can’t reasonably consider banning rape in fiction without banning murder and torture,”

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's the most tired argument to justify using rape for commercial gain though.
What would his response be if Steam banned all these games altogether?

Hiding behind freedom of speech and "oh there's things out there that are just as bad" is the refuge of the weaklings with no conscience.

Hey, rape is not as bad as pedophilia so it's ok.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

in the end it comes down to is your view on violence an absolute or a variable.
if its a variable in what order do the forms of violence offend.
for me: assault < murder = rape
for you: assault < murder < rape
neither of us is right or wrong.
by allowing 1 form of violence and banning another form of violence you are creating an absolute that forces others to conform to a logic that is neither right or wrong as there is no absolute on the subject because its all in the eye of the beholder.
if there is to be commercial gain from violence let all aspects be available and let the consumer choose whether or not to view, buy, play, watch, or read.
who's to say your (murder < rape) is right and my (murder = rape) is wrong.
when it comes to fiction, censorship is only imposed by those who wish to control others world views.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

when it comes to fiction, censorship is only imposed by those who wish to control others world views.

I understand your point but this is not fiction. It's not even trying to say anything. It's just baiting for women haters, sociopaths and teenage boys. Where's the view? What's it's point? If you're going to target a whole gender for victimization in a game, as the sole purpose of the game, and hide behind freedom of expression, shouldn't you at least express something?

I want to make it clear I am not arguing for censorship on this kind of games. I would just prefer Steam had the integrity not to make money off them, and to at least make sure that they are not sold to impressionable people.

who's to say your (murder < rape) is right and my (murder = rape) is wrong.

I'm not saying murder is better than rape, although I have heard many rape survivors say they would be better off dead, so I can't judge.
I'm just saying using the old "there are things just as bad that are not frowned upon so it's ok" is an easy way out of the debate.
Like saying "drugs should be legal because alcohol and cigarettes are also bad for you and they're legal". It's a cop-out. It may even be true, I don't know. Or maybe they should all be illegal, I don't know either. But the debate should happen.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

months ago i reported another game for not having sufficient warnings regarding non-con/sexual assault to Steam and not a damn thing changed so i'm not surprised that something as bluntly titled as "rape day" got through onto their store. they don't care. if it makes them money they will never care. it has to hit mainstream media like that school shooter game did with all the attached outrage for them to actually do anything about it.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Rape is not ok, murder is not ok, drugs are not ok, lying is not ok, robbery is not ok, but not all cultures are the same.

Those things will keep going happening, doesn't care you don't like them, there are many factor involved in criminology, you just can't attach a single factor to certain antisocial behavior. A single videogame (If I remember this right there are now like less than 7-10 rape video games 'knowed')

People will keep consuming drugs, lying, robbing, raping.

If videogames (at this point) where the root of all bad things going, just imagine all the wars we could had prevented "banning" violent videogames in ancient Rome I.E.

Sorry for typos or not making a valid and clear point, language barrier.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Except drugs are ok. They are just like alcohol and cigarettes, which are ok.

And lying is also ok, depending on the circumstance.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes, you can see it has multiple factors, at some cases, people CHOOSE doing drugs, CHOOSE lying, and may be multiple variants about their chooses,

Some laws have ancient religious morals involved. Is very complex and confusing the human world, isn't it?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

shrugs

It is a fetish game, like how an assload of fetish porn exists from pretended necrophilia to things that would make even the script of the 8 mm Nicholas Cage film seem mild. Heck, sometimes it feels like half of the Japanese adult film market makes nothing but pretended rape/gangrape scenes.

It can be argued if Steam should really allow its storefront to host niché fetish games, especially when they deal with the darker side of sexual fantasies that are normally considered illegal in almost all countries, but if you guys think this is the world's first serial killer/rapist simulator with some kind of actual budget, then you are more naive than I thought. Japan started doing games like that in the nineties.

As a side note, gotta lova that gaming media is fully online, yet the large outlets are now picking up a few-week-old story.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

9 out of 10 people love gang rapes.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You are the 10?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

More like 0, I don't partake in such activities so you can have the spot.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nah, I feel like special, but I would if you invite me

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's 8 now.

Her dad is starting to have second thoughts.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's sexist, what if it's his mom and her 8 cougar friends and 1 out of 8 are only in it because of peer pressure?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Assuming that you have to have a mom is homophobic.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Assuming any of them have a gender is binarymanic.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But the lack of a gender is in itstelf a gender.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

set game and match

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 5 years ago by quantr.