Why people prefer gameplay at review on youtube?

because is a option and life is full of options

I Prefer to read reviews that watch them on youtube, Some of them reviewers have such annoying voices it really grinds my gears :/

Why people prefer actual content in an OP?

I don't understand the title. I'm not understanding "gameplay at review" so I don't understand the question.

I like gameplays and I like reviews on YT. They are usually 2 different things.

Assuming your "at" means "over" and YT is after gameplay and not review: People are too lazy to read.

I think reviews impose or have a huge impact on many of its viewers, for example someone hated a game but maybe you would loved it, you see its review and say: "nope" and dont even give it a try.

While watching gameplay you get an idea of how the game might be without being told that the game is good or is bad.

Reviews could be biased since it's based on what the gamer/reviewer feels about the game. Majority of reviewers are biased when they review certain games such as BF vs CoD or MoW vs CoH. They would say what they didn't like about it or liked about it compared to other games. Some would go like "I recommend not to buy this game. Instead, use your money on ___" and then it's like a seed of doubt planted in you.

Gameplay is just gameplay. Gameplay are rarely biased since you just see the game being played and how it works, allowing you to make a decision for yourself.

I think, because in gameplay you can actually see how the game looks, how it works and you can judge by yourself if you want this game. In review you "can't see the game" you just read a someone else's opinion and they say what THEY like or dislike about the game. When i want to know more about game, first i'm watching gameplay, and when still I'm not sure then I read reviews.