Do you click a banana?

That's probably true, then he spends around $1k daily on that buying different shit 3 cent bananas to keep the market going and the game looks alive and people look interested in the items and valve doesn't take it down cause they think it's good.

Wish we could go back to the early 2000's when not everything was about profit or even if it was, it meant delivering quality.

Not gonna answer this myself since I see this "game" as fraud and exploitation of weak minds.

Here, this is what ChatGPT tells (I was expecting more though):

If the entire concept of the game revolves around dropping items that can be sold on the Steam Market, and there is essentially no gameplay beyond minimal interaction (like clicking on a banana), this raises several points to consider:

    Developer's Intent and Design: If the developer has intentionally designed the game to be a minimal-interaction experience focused on item drops for market sales, then players are not necessarily engaging in fraudulent behavior. They are using the game as intended.

    Steam's Policies: Steam has policies against what it considers exploitative or abusive behavior on its platform. If Steam perceives that the primary purpose of the game is to exploit the market system, they might take action against the game or its developers. Steam could remove the game from their platform, restrict its market features, or ban accounts associated with perceived exploitation.

    Market Impact: Games designed primarily to generate marketable items can impact the Steam Market's economy, potentially leading to inflation or devaluation of items. This can harm other developers and games that rely on a balanced and fair market system.

    Community Perception: Such games might receive negative feedback from the community, which can impact the reputation of both the game and its developers. Players might feel that the game does not offer genuine value or entertainment, leading to negative reviews and reduced trust in the developer.

    Ethical Considerations: While not necessarily fraudulent, creating a game solely for the purpose of generating marketable items can be seen as ethically questionable. It may be viewed as taking advantage of the Steam Market system and exploiting players who might not realize the true nature of the game.

In conclusion, while a game designed primarily for item drops to sell on the Steam Market may not strictly be fraud, it does raise several ethical and policy-related concerns. Both developers and players should be aware of the potential repercussions from Steam and the broader gaming community.

impossible! 1000 accounts on PCs? financially doesn't make sense and i don't believe the playerbase are type of people that can code lol

not surprising after seeing all those companies that put time (i don't know if I would say effort or even that much money honestly) into NFTs because they just wanted a quick buck.

Banana gave new life to the NFT craze. This is first NFT game on steam that went viral. The influx of these types of games over the next couple weeks is more than likely going to be massive.

TBH I wouldn't even call Banana a clicker game as you don't really need to click, it's an NFT dropper/collector. It's a very simplied NFT dropper/collector too. The EGS has a ton of NFT games if you want to compare them.

It's not, as someone who is running it right now and also mining (xmr), it's definitely not.

missed that one thanks but now it just is getting silly

Thanks!