Men of war are not like company of heroes. Men of war are more realistic; an heavy machinegun or a tank can take out infantry with very few hits, the tanks are also really fragile. It's not like company of heroes in which a group of men can take a few dozens of hits then hide.
That said men of war (the original) and men of war red tide have very good campaign for singleplayer.
Men of war assault squad 1/2 is the best to play co-op or multiplayer in my opinion.
Those are the men of war that i played.
Comment has been collapsed.
376 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by ginjoestar7
39 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by terrascura
466 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by KjaerBeto
16,238 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by WaxWorm
12 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Droj
46 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by sensualshakti
19 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by TinTG
69 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by lycankai
425 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by IGotWhatYouNeed
759 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by Bum8ara5h
10 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Thexder
163 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by Taurtirith
342 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MayoSlice
2,695 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by s4k1s
I'm going to give Sega the middle finger because of the dick move with Ardennes pricing. I'll buy some Men of War instead.
How does it compare, gameplay wise, with Company of Heroes (the first one, didn't played CoH2 yet). Which, of the MoW saga, are the best for single player? Which can I pass if I'm not into multiplayer?
Thanks a lot.
Edit: stupid editor... :p
Comment has been collapsed.