If they put exactly same giveaway conditions then indeed it doesn't make any sense, but that's up to giveaway creator and his/her preferences. They don't receive any benefits from creating giveaways like this, apart from forcing people interested in all copies to pay price multiplied by number of copies they want to join for.
This might be the only valid reason for doing it like this, but I doubt that anybody actually creates those giveaways for this reason - they simply don't know or don't want to know.
Comment has been collapsed.
With single copy giveaways, you can easily skim down your giveaway list and see who's marked it and who hasn't. With multiple copy giveaways, it waits until every single winner has marked it before there's any indicator that any of them got it. I like to follow up and make sure the game gets activated, so multi-copy giveaways actually make things a little more of a hassle for me in the end.
Comment has been collapsed.
328 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by medion
98 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by jojo1241
16,722 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Vee79
391 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by SeefKroy
29 Comments - Last post 14 hours ago by scap
914 Comments - Last post 17 hours ago by wigglenose
37 Comments - Last post 17 hours ago by spodamayn
1,369 Comments - Last post 53 seconds ago by Fromalan
169 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by UnknownEAK
60 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by Deleted2137
995 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Arwiee
124 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by GeekDoesStuff
23 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by PatchmaN
52 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Ashtart
I see many public giveaways for the same games made by the same person. They are all the same level too (mostly level 0 or 1). They all start and end at the same time. Why do people do this rather than use the "number of copies" function? Is there an advantage to doing them this way or is it that these people don't understand how the function works?
Comment has been collapsed.