If they put exactly same giveaway conditions then indeed it doesn't make any sense, but that's up to giveaway creator and his/her preferences. They don't receive any benefits from creating giveaways like this, apart from forcing people interested in all copies to pay price multiplied by number of copies they want to join for.
This might be the only valid reason for doing it like this, but I doubt that anybody actually creates those giveaways for this reason - they simply don't know or don't want to know.
Comment has been collapsed.
With single copy giveaways, you can easily skim down your giveaway list and see who's marked it and who hasn't. With multiple copy giveaways, it waits until every single winner has marked it before there's any indicator that any of them got it. I like to follow up and make sure the game gets activated, so multi-copy giveaways actually make things a little more of a hassle for me in the end.
Comment has been collapsed.
1 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by pb1
6 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by Bomfist
13 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by Outmind
30 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by Chris76de
2 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by sallachim
17,448 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by Masafor
10 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by NB264
22 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by pb1
54 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by BauerBoy24
558 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by Ignition365
19 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by Sh4dowKill
184 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by pizzahut
2,953 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Sebastien
1,176 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Tucs
I see many public giveaways for the same games made by the same person. They are all the same level too (mostly level 0 or 1). They all start and end at the same time. Why do people do this rather than use the "number of copies" function? Is there an advantage to doing them this way or is it that these people don't understand how the function works?
Comment has been collapsed.