If they put exactly same giveaway conditions then indeed it doesn't make any sense, but that's up to giveaway creator and his/her preferences. They don't receive any benefits from creating giveaways like this, apart from forcing people interested in all copies to pay price multiplied by number of copies they want to join for.
This might be the only valid reason for doing it like this, but I doubt that anybody actually creates those giveaways for this reason - they simply don't know or don't want to know.
Comment has been collapsed.
With single copy giveaways, you can easily skim down your giveaway list and see who's marked it and who hasn't. With multiple copy giveaways, it waits until every single winner has marked it before there's any indicator that any of them got it. I like to follow up and make sure the game gets activated, so multi-copy giveaways actually make things a little more of a hassle for me in the end.
Comment has been collapsed.
3,506 Comments - Last post 14 seconds ago by AdJ
78 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Bin246
18 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Celtic69
17,520 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Kenruyoh
15 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by colddim
25 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Dandey
505 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by osztihun
9,117 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by schmetti
3,044 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by Ellendyl
100 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by zpangwin
49 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by AnthonyYo
2,156 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Meokk
41 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Bobogoobo
1,331 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Eremeir
I see many public giveaways for the same games made by the same person. They are all the same level too (mostly level 0 or 1). They all start and end at the same time. Why do people do this rather than use the "number of copies" function? Is there an advantage to doing them this way or is it that these people don't understand how the function works?
Comment has been collapsed.